Cited by 105Animal testing and alternativesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEthics in Clinical Research

Whole animal experiments should be more like human randomized controlled trials

Open access
Muhlhausler, Beverly S., Bloomfield, Frank H., Gillman, Matthew W.·2013·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The Perspective section provides experts with a forum to

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001481

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For hypothesis-testing experiments, the sample size needs to be justified to ensure experiments are of an optimal size to test the research question.

    “For hypothesis-testing experiments, in which inferential statistics are used to estimate the size of the effect and to determine the weight of evidence against the null hypothesis, the sample size needs to be justified to ensure experiments are of an optimal size to test the research question [33,34] (see Item 13. Objectives).”
  • If the experiment is testing the efficacy of a treatment, the occurrence of adverse events may alter the balance between treatment benefit and risk.

    “If the experiment is testing the efficacy of a treatment, the occurrence of adverse events may alter the balance between treatment benefit and risk [34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Rothman KJ (1978) Show of confidence. N Eng J Med 299: 1362– 1363. 362205

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhlhausler, B. S., Bloomfield, F. H., & Gillman, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2013-02-12
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
e1001481
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2020743835
Cited by
105
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
animal models, randomized controlled trials, translational research, animal research ethics, experimental design
MeSH terms
Animals, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Animal Experimentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review