Cited by 959Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts

Open access
Blackburn, Tim M., Essl, Franz, Evans, Thomas, Hulme, Philip E., Jeschke, Jonathan M., Kühn, Ingolf, Kumschick, Sabrina, Marková, Zuzana +13 more·2014·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Species moved by human activities beyond the limits of their native geographic ranges into areas in which they do not naturally occur (termed aliens) can cause a broad range of significant changes to recipient ecosystems; however, their impacts vary greatly across species and the ecosystems into which they are introduced. There is therefore a critical need for a standardised method to evaluate, compare, and eventually predict the magnitudes of these different impacts. Here, we propose a straightforward system for classifying alien species according to the magnitude of their environmental impacts, based on the mechanisms of impact used to code species in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Global Invasive Species Database, which are presented here for the first time. The classification system uses five semi-quantitative scenarios describing impacts under each mechanism to assign species to different levels of impact-ranging from Minimal to Massive-with assignment corresponding to the highest level of deleterious impact associated with any of the mechanisms. The scheme also includes categories for species that are Not Evaluated, have No Alien Population, or are Data Deficient, and a method for assigning uncertainty to all the classifications. We show how this classification system is applicable at different levels of ecological complexity and different spatial and temporal scales, and embraces existing impact metrics. In fact, the scheme is analogous to the already widely adopted and accepted Red List approach to categorising extinction risk, and so could conceivably be readily integrated with existing practices and policies in many regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impacts of alien species vary greatly across species, regions, and ecosystems.

    “Impacts of alien species vary greatly across species, regions, and ecosystems (Blackburn et al., 2014)”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Blackburn et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [5]Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND (2008) The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol Ecol 17: 351– 360. 18173507
  2. [7]Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14: 702– 708. 21592274
  3. [8]Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, et al (2009) Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21721– 21725. 20007367 PMC2792159
  4. [9]Gozlan RE, St-Hilaire S, Feist SW, Martin P, Kent ML (2005) Biodiversity: disease threat to European fish. Nature 435: 1046– 46. 15973399
  5. [11]Strayer DL (2012) Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 15: 1199– 1210. 22694728
  6. [15]Chiba S (2010) Invasive non-native species' provision of refugia for endangered native species. Conserv Biol 24: 1141– 1147. 20184648
  7. [16]Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conserv Biol 25: 428– 437. 21342267
  8. [17]Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ, et al (2011) Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 474: 153– 154. 21654782
  9. [19]Simberloff D, Souza L, Nuñez MA, Barrios-Garcia MN, Bunn W (2012) The natives are restless, but not often and mostly when disturbed. Ecology 93: 598– 607. 22624214
  10. [21]Clout MN, Williams PA, editors (2009) Invasive species management: a handbook of principles and techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. [22]Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Vila M (2013) Bias and error in current knowledge of plant invasions impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 212– 218. 23153723
  12. [23]IUCN (2012) IUCN Red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. Second edition. Gland: IUCN. www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria
  13. [24]Nentwig W, Kühnel E, Bacher S (2010) A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv Biol 24: 302– 311. 19604296
  14. [33]EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH) (2011) Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests. EFSA Journal 9: 2460.
  15. [34]Leung B, Roura-Pascual N, Bacher S, Heikkilä J, Brotons L, et al (2012) TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: a framework for best practices. Ecol Lett 15: 1475– 1493. 23020170
  16. [35]Davies TD, Baum JK (2012) Extinction risk and overfishing: reconciling conservation and fisheries perspectives on the status of marine fishes. Sci Rep 2: 561. 22872806 PMC3413007
  17. [39]Didham RK, Tylianakis JM, Gemmell NJ, Rand TA, Ewers RM (2007) Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 489– 496. 17673330
  18. [41]Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 645– 651. 16859805
  19. [42]Dostál P, Müllerova J, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Klinerova T (2013) The impact of an invasive plant changes over time. Ecol Lett 16: 1277– 1284. 23953187
  20. [44]Essl F, Nehring S, Klingenstein F, Milasowszky N, Nowack C, et al (2011) Review of risk assessment systems of IAS in Europe and introducing the German-Austrian Black List Information System (GABLIS). J Nat Conserv 19: 339– 350.
  21. [46]Mace GM, Collar NJ, Gaston KJ, Hilton-Taylor C, Akçakaya HR, et al (2008) Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol 22: 1424– 1442. 18847444
  22. [47]Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, et al (2013) Impact of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 58– 66. 22889499
  23. [50]Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Carlton J (2011) A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology. Richardson DM, editor. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. pp. 409–420.
  24. [52]Charles H, Dukes JS (2007) Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services. Nentwig W, editor. Biological invasions. Ecological Studies 193. Springer. pp. 217–237.
  25. [53]Pejchar L, Mooney H (2009) Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 497– 504. 19577817
  26. [56]Nghiem LTP, Soliman T, Yeo DCJ, Tan HTW, Evans TA, et al (2013) Economic and environmental impacts of harmful non-indigenous species in Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE 8: e71255. 23951120 PMC3739798
  27. [57]Bartz R, Heink U, Kowarik I (2010) Proposed definition of environmental damage illustrated by the cases of genetically modified crops and invasive species. Conserv Biol 24: 675– 681. 20015260
  28. [58]Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasion. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 223– 228. 16701373
  29. [60]Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, et al (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 333– 339. 21601306
  30. [63]Gaither MR, Aeby G, Vignon M, Meguro Y, Rigby M, et al (2013) Invasive fish and the time-lagged spread of its parasite across the Hawaiian Archipelago. PLoS ONE 8: e56940. 23468894 PMC3584140

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackburn, T. M., Essl, F., Evans, T., Hulme, P. E., Jeschke, J. M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., Marková, Z., Mrugała, A., Nentwig, W., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Rabitsch, W., Ricciardi, A., Richardson, D. M., Sendek, A., Vilà, M., Wilson, J. R. U., Winter, M., Genovesi, P., & Bacher, S.
Affiliations
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ)
  • Environment Agency Austria (AT)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
Corresponding author
Blackburn, Tim M.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
e1001850
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W1998494818
Cited by
959
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
58.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Biodiversa+
  • National Research Foundation (85417, 86894)
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JE 288/7-1, FZT118)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-EBID-0003)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy (RVO 67985939)
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky (GB14-36079G, RVO 67,985,939, GAP504/11/1028, 67985939)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (RVO [67985939], 67985939, 14‐36079G, P504/11/1028)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig (FZT 118)
  • DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (85417, P504/11/1028)
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
invasive species, environmental impact classification, impact mechanism, impact indicators, classification uncertainty, ecosystem change, biological invasions
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Humans, Human Activities, Plants, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Soil, Species Specificity, Food Chain, Uncertainty, Biodiversity, Extinction, Biological, Introduced Species, Herbivory, Animal Distribution, Plant Dispersal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review