Cited by 232Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesCoastal and Marine Management

Classification of Non-Indigenous Species Based on Their Impacts: Considerations for Application in Marine Management

Open access
Ojaveer, Henn, Galil, Bella S., Campbell, Marnie L., Carlton, James T., Canning-Clode, João, Cook, Elizabeth J., Davidson, Alisha D., Hewitt, Chad L. +7 more·2015·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Assessment of the ecological and economic/societal impacts of the introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS) is one of the primary focus areas of bioinvasion science in terrestrial and aquatic environments, and is considered essential to management. A classification system of NIS, based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts, was recently proposed to assist management. Here, we consider the potential application of this classification scheme to the marine environment, and offer a complementary framework focussing on value sets in order to explicitly address marine management concerns. Since existing data on marine NIS impacts are scarce and successful marine removals are rare, we propose that management of marine NIS adopt a precautionary approach, which not only would emphasise preventing new incursions through pre-border and at-border controls but also should influence the categorisation of impacts. The study of marine invasion impacts requires urgent attention and significant investment, since we lack the luxury of waiting for the knowledge base to be acquired before the window of opportunity closes for feasible management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002130

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several additional confounding factors distort the actual impact patterns, such as paucity of data, taxonomic impediment, challenges for assessing and quantifying the actual impact of particular alien taxa, and weak inferential strength of evidence.

    “Furthermore, there are several additional confounding factors that distort the actual impact patterns, such as paucity of data (Ojaveer et al. 2015), taxonomic impediment (Engel et al. 2021), challenges for assessing and quantifying the actual impact of particular alien taxa (Carlton 2002; Simberloff 2011; Davidson and Hewitt 2014; Strayer et al. 2017), and weak infer”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 232

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [3]Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarosik V, et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14: 702– 708. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x 21592274 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [5]Blackburn TM, Essl F, Evans T, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, et al (2014) A unified classification of alien species based on the magnitude of their environmental impacts. PLoS Biol 12: e1001850 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001850 24802715 PMC4011680 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [11]Carlton JT (2009) Deep invasion ecology and the assembly of communities in historical time In: Rilov G, Crooks JA, editors. Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag pp. 13– 56.
  4. [14]Campbell ML, Gould B, Hewitt CL (2007) Survey evaluations to assess marine bioinvasions. Mar Poll Bull 55: 360– 378. 17391713
  5. [23]Andreakis N, Procaccini G, Maggs C, Kooistra WHCF (2007) Phylogeography of the invasive seaweed Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta) reveals cryptic diversity. Mol Ecol 16: 2285– 2299. 17561891
  6. [26]Stachowicz J, Terwin RJ, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2002) Linking climate change and biological invasions: ocean warming facilitates nonindigenous species invasions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15497– 15500. 12422019 PMC137745
  7. [27]Rahel FJ, Olden JD (2008) Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv Biol 22: 521– 533. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x 18577081 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [28]Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22: 534– 543. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x 18577082 · DOI
  9. [29]McGeoch MA, Spear D, Kleynhans EJ, Marais E (2012) Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. Ecol Appl 22: 959– 971. 22645824
  10. [34]Gurevitch J, Padilla DK (2004) Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions? Trends Ecol Evol 19: 470– 474. 16701309
  11. [35]Ojaveer H, Kotta J (2015) Ecosystem impacts of the widespread non-indigenous species in the Baltic Sea: literature survey evidences major limitations in knowledge. Hydrobiologia 750: 171– 185. 10.1007/s10750-014-2080-5 · DOI
  12. [37]Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, et al (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 58– 66. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013 22889499 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [39]Katsanevakis S, Wallentinus I, Zenetos A, Leppäkoski E, Çinar ME, et al (2014) Impacts of invasive alien marine species on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a pan-European review. Aquat Invasion 9: 391– 423.
  14. [40]Ruiz G, Fofonoff P, Steves B, Dahlstrom A (2011) Marine crustacean invasions in North America: a synthesis of historical records and documented impacts In: Galil BS, Clark PF, Carlton JT, editors. In the wrong place—alien marine crustaceans: distribution, biology and impacts. Invading nature—Springer series in invasion ecology. New York: Springer pp. 215– 250.
  15. [43]Williams SL, Smith JE (2007) A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38: 327– 359.
  16. [46]Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ, et al (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474: 153– 154. 10.1038/474153a 21654782 · DOI
  17. [47]Simberloff D, Alexander J, Allendorf F, Aronson J, Antunes P, et al (2011) Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475: 36 10.1038/475036c 21734689 · DOI
  18. [48]Alyokhin A (2011) Non-natives: put biodiversity at risk. Nature 475: 36 10.1038/475036c 21734688 · DOI
  19. [49]Lehmann EL, Romano J (2005) Testing statistical hypotheses New York: Springer.
  20. [53]Genovesi P (2005) Eradications of invasive alien species in Europe: a review. Biol Invasion 7: 127– 133.
  21. [61]Wotton DM, O’Brien C, Stuart MD, Fergus DJ (2004) Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida. Mar Pollut Bull 49: 844– 849. 15530528
  22. [64]Galil BS, Marchini A, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Minchin D, Narščius A, et al (2014) International arrivals: widespread bioinvasions in European seas. Ethol Ecol Evol 26: 152– 171. 24899770 PMC4034525
  23. [65]Davidson AD, Campbell ML, Hewitt CL (2013) The role of uncertainty and subjective influences on consequence assessment by aquatic biosecurity experts. J Environ Manag 127: 103– 113. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.043 23685271 · DOI
  24. [66]Olenin S, Minchin D, Daunys D (2007) Assessment of biopollution in aquatic ecosystems. Mar Pollut Bull 55: 379– 394. 17335857
  25. [69]Olenin S, Elliott M, Bysveen I, Culverhouse P, Daunys D, et al (2011) Recommendations on methods for the detection and control of biological pollution in marine coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 62: 2598– 2604. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.08.011 21889171 · DOI
  26. [70]Olenina I, Wasmund N, Hajdu S, Jurgensone I, Gromisz S, et al (2010) Assessing impacts of invasive phytoplankton: the Baltic Sea case. Mar Pollut Bull 60: 1691– 1700. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.046 20655073 · DOI
  27. [74]McCauley DJ, Pinsky ML, Palumbi SR, Estes JA, Joyce FH, et al (2015) Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347: 1255641 10.1126/science.1255641 25593191 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [77]Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM (2012) Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annu Rev Mar Sci 4: 143– 176. 22457972 PMC5373096

Authors
Ojaveer, H., Galil, B. S., Campbell, M. L., Carlton, J. T., Canning-Clode, J., Cook, E. J., Davidson, A. D., Hewitt, C. L., Jelmert, A., Marchini, A., McKenzie, C. H., Minchin, D., Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A., Olenin, S., & Ruiz, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Tartu (EE)
  • Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research (IL)
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • Williams College (US)
  • Scottish Association For Marine Science (GB)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
  • Klaipėda University (LT)
  • Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ojaveer, Henn
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2015-04-15
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
e1002130
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W1985993987
Cited by
232
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (266445, 2007–2013)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/75775/2011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
Keywords
introduced species, marine invasions, impact classification, marine management, precautionary approach, value sets, invasion prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Marine Biology, Introduced Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review