Cited by 118Animal testing and alternativesOptimal Experimental Design MethodsResearch Data Management Practices

The Experimental Design Assistant

Open access
Percie du Sert, Nathalie, Bamsey, Ian, Bate, Simon T., Berdoy, Manuel, Clark, Robin A., Cuthill, Innes, Fry, Derek, Karp, Natasha A. +4 more·2017·PLOS Biology

Abstract

Addressing the common problems that researchers encounter when designing and analysing animal experiments will improve the reliability of in vivo research. In this article, the Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) is introduced. The EDA is a web-based tool that guides the in vivo researcher through the experimental design and analysis process, providing automated feedback on the proposed design and generating a graphical summary that aids communication with colleagues, funders, regulatory authorities, and the wider scientific community. It will have an important role in addressing causes of irreproducibility.

Verifying this paper

8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textRead the full text
  3. Reference list24 references found
  4. Reference checkChecking each cited work — 23 of 23
  5. StatisticsNeeds the full text
  6. ClaimsNeeds the full text
  7. Cited sourcesNeeds claims to check
  8. Self-checkNeeds the full text
  9. VerificationFindings verified

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003779

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) is a platform to support researchers in the design of in vivo experiments; it can be used to generate diagrams to represent any type of experimental design.

    “The Experimental Design Assistant (EDA) is a platform to support researchers in the design of in vivo experiments; it can be used to generate diagrams to represent any type of experimental design [19].”

    From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction describes the EDA as a web-based tool that guides researchers in designing animal experiments and produces diagrams of their plans. The section on standard notation describes diagrams for different designs, but our copy does not establish the broader claim that it can represent any type of experimental design. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The EDA can be used to generate a time-stamped PDF, which sets out key elements of the experimental design.

    “The EDA can also be used to generate a time-stamped PDF, which sets out key elements of the experimental design [19].”

    From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction section on improving the reliability of experimental results and analysis (Fig. 1 workflow; page not available in our copy) says users can export a PDF report containing the EDA diagram and information about the experiment’s internal validity. It does not say the PDF is time-stamped. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Percie du Sert, N., Bamsey, I., Bate, S. T., Berdoy, M., Clark, R. A., Cuthill, I., Fry, D., Karp, N. A., Macleod, M., Moon, L., Stanford, S. C., & Lings, B.
Affiliations
  • Certus Technology (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Envigo (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2017-09-28
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
e2003779
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2758193291
Cited by
118
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
25.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/L000970/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
animal experimentation, experimental design, statistical analysis, web application, reproducibility, in vivo research, research reliability, graphical summaries
MeSH terms
Feedback, Research Design, Software, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review