Cited by 12Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Chromatin remodeller Chd7 is developmentally regulated in the neural crest by tissue-specific transcription factors

Open access
Williams, Ruth M., Taylor, Guneş, Ling, Irving T. C., Candido-Ferreira, Ivan, Fountain, Daniel M., Mayes, Sarah, Ateş-Kalkan, Perihan Seda, Haug, Julianna O. +7 more·2024·PLOS Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neurocristopathies such as CHARGE syndrome result from aberrant neural crest development. A large proportion of CHARGE cases are attributed to pathogenic variants in the gene encoding CHD7, chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 7, which remodels chromatin. While the role for CHD7 in neural crest development is well documented, how this factor is specifically up-regulated in neural crest cells is not understood. Here, we use epigenomic profiling of chick and human neural crest to identify a cohort of enhancers regulating Chd7 expression in neural crest cells and other tissues. We functionally validate upstream transcription factor binding at candidate enhancers, revealing novel epistatic relationships between neural crest master regulators and Chd7, showing tissue-specific regulation of a globally acting chromatin remodeller. Furthermore, we find conserved enhancer features in human embryonic epigenomic data and validate the activity of the human equivalent CHD7 enhancers in the chick embryo. Our findings embed Chd7 in the neural crest gene regulatory network and offer potentially clinically relevant elements for interpreting CHARGE syndrome cases without causative allocation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002786

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunction of chromatin remodeling genes can lead to systemic disruptions in developmental programming and plasticity regulation.

    “Dysfunction of these genes can lead to systemic disruptions in developmental programming and plasticity regulation (Ogino and Dou, 2024; Williams et al., 2024).”

    From Biological hierarchy from genotype to phenotype in syndromic and non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder (2026) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 2024

    The Introduction (page unavailable) links CHD7 mutations to CHARGE syndrome, describes abnormalities in multiple organs, and reports that neural crest cells require Chd7 to maintain multipotency. This supports disruption of development and a specific form of cellular plasticity, but not the broader claim of systemic disruption of plasticity regulation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the head and neck. 4th ed. Oxford England; New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. xiv, p. 1283.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R. M., Taylor, G., Ling, I. T. C., Candido-Ferreira, I., Fountain, D. M., Mayes, S., Ateş-Kalkan, P. S., Haug, J. O., Price, A. J., McKinney, S. A., Bozhilovh, Y. K., Tyser, R. C. V., Srinivas, S., Hughes, J. R., & Sauka-Spengler, T.
Affiliations
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Ruth M.
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2024-10-17
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
e3002786
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W4403511184
Cited by
12
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (215615/Z/19?Z)
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research
  • Cancer Research UK (BST00230-H400.01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
CHD7, chromatin remodeling, neural crest development, CHARGE syndrome, enhancers, transcription factor binding, gene regulatory networks, epigenomics, chick embryo, tissue-specific gene regulation, neurocristopathy
MeSH terms
Animals, Chick Embryo, DNA Helicases, DNA-Binding Proteins, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Neural Crest, Organ Specificity, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Gene Regulatory Networks, CHARGE Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review