The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Striking Similarities in the Genomic Distribution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes in Arabidopsis and Rice
Open accessAbstract
In Arabidopsis, tandemly arrayed genes (TAGs) comprise >10% of the genes in the genome. These duplicated genes represent a rich template for genetic innovation, but little is known of the evolutionary forces governing their generation and maintenance. Here we compare the organization and evolution of TAGs between Arabidopsis and rice, two plant genomes that diverged ~150 million years ago. TAGs from the two genomes are similar in a number of respects, including the proportion of genes that are tandemly arrayed, the number of genes within an array, the number of tandem arrays, and the dearth of TAGs relative to single copy genes in centromeric regions. Analysis of recombination rates along rice chromosomes confirms a positive correlation between the occurrence of TAGs and recombination rate, as found in Arabidopsis. TAGs are also biased functionally relative to duplicated, nontandemly arrayed genes. In both genomes, TAGs are enriched for genes that encode membrane proteins and function in "abiotic and biotic stress" but underrepresented for genes involved in transcription and DNA or RNA binding functions. We speculate that these observations reflect an evolutionary trend in which successful tandem duplication involves genes either at the end of biochemical pathways or in flexible steps in a pathway, for which fluctuation in copy number is unlikely to affect downstream genes. Despite differences in the age distribution of tandem arrays, the striking similarities between rice and Arabidopsis indicate similar mechanisms of TAG generation and maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
Cited by
MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity
Wang, Y., Tang, H., DeBarry, J. D., Tan, X., Li, J., Wang, X., Lee, T.-H., Jin, H., Marler, B., Guo, H., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1293 · Cited by 7,093
Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
Evolution of Stress-Regulated Gene Expression in Duplicate Genes of Arabidopsis thaliana
Zou, C., Lehti-Shiu, M. D., Thomashow, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000581 · Cited by 149
Fifteen Million Years of Evolution in the Oryza Genus Shows Extensive Gene Family Expansion
Jacquemin, J., Ammiraju, J. S. S., Haberer, G., Billheimer, D. D., Yu, Y., Liu, L. C., Rivera, L. F., Mayer, K., Chen, M., & Wing, R. A. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/sst149 · Cited by 54
Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution
Kileeg, Z., Haldar, A., Khan, H., Qamar, A., & Mott, G. A. (2023) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.556 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Rizzon, C., Ponger, L., & Gaut, B. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e115
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W1984212742
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Striking Similarities in the Genomic Distribution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes in Arabidopsis and Rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020115
- The paper
- Rizzon, C., Ponger, L., & Gaut, B. S. (2006). Striking Similarities in the Genomic Distribution of Tandemly Arrayed Genes in Arabidopsis and Rice. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.