The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks
Open accessAbstract
Networks are becoming a ubiquitous metaphor for the understanding of complex biological systems, spanning the range between molecular signalling pathways, neural networks in the brain, and interacting species in a food web. In many models, we face an intricate interplay between the topology of the network and the dynamics of the system, which is generally very hard to disentangle. A dynamical feature that has been subject of intense research in various fields are correlations between the noisy activity of nodes in a network. We consider a class of systems, where discrete signals are sent along the links of the network. Such systems are of particular relevance in neuroscience, because they provide models for networks of neurons that use action potentials for communication. We study correlations in dynamic networks with arbitrary topology, assuming linear pulse coupling. With our novel approach, we are able to understand in detail how specific structural motifs affect pairwise correlations. Based on a power series decomposition of the covariance matrix, we describe the conditions under which very indirect interactions will have a pronounced effect on correlations and population dynamics. In random networks, we find that indirect interactions may lead to a broad distribution of activation levels with low average but highly variable correlations. This phenomenon is even more pronounced in networks with distance dependent connectivity. In contrast, networks with highly connected hubs or patchy connections often exhibit strong average correlations. Our results are particularly relevant in view of new experimental techniques that enable the parallel recording of spiking activity from a large number of neurons, an appropriate interpretation of which is hampered by the currently limited understanding of structure-dynamics relations in complex networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes
HAWKES, A. G. (1971) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/58.1.83 · Cited by 2,252
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03870.1998 · Cited by 2,178
Chaos in Neuronal Networks with Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity
van Vreeswijk, C., & Sompolinsky, H. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1724 · Cited by 1,811
Neural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743
Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons
Brunel, N. (2000) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1008925309027 · Cited by 1,726
Softky, W., & Koch, C. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00334.1993 · Cited by 1,689
Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits
Song, S., Sjöström, P. J., Reigl, M., Nelson, S., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068 · Cited by 1,512
Synaptic Modification by Correlated Activity: Hebb's Postulate Revisited
Bi, G.-Q., & Poo, M.-M. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.139 · Cited by 1,489
Cited by
Interoceptive predictions in the brain
Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3950 · Cited by 1,766
Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience
Sporns, O. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3690 · Cited by 759
Deco, G., Ponce-Alvarez, A., Mantini, D., Romani, G. L., Hagmann, P., & Corbetta, M. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1091-13.2013 · Cited by 576
The human connectome: Origins and challenges
Sporns, O. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023 · Cited by 437
Redefining the role of limbic areas in cortical processing
Chanes, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.005 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Pernice, V., Staude, B., Cardanobile, S., & Rotter, S.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-05-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1002059
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2012529953
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002059
- The paper
- Pernice, V., Staude, B., Cardanobile, S., & Rotter, S. (2011). How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.