Cited by 1,689Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random epsps.

Open access
Softky, WR, Koch, C·1993·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

How random is the discharge pattern of cortical neurons? We examined recordings from primary visual cortex (V1; Knierim and Van Essen, 1992) and extrastriate cortex (MT; Newsome et al., 1989a) of awake, behaving macaque monkey and compared them to analytical predictions. For nonbursting cells firing at sustained rates up to 300 Hz, we evaluated two indices of firing variability: the ratio of the variance to the mean for the number of action potentials evoked by a constant stimulus, and the rate-normalized coefficient of variation (Cv) of the interspike interval distribution. Firing in virtually all V1 and MT neurons was nearly consistent with a completely random process (e.g., Cv approximately 1). We tried to model this high variability by small, independent, and random EPSPs converging onto a leaky integrate-and-fire neuron (Knight, 1972). Both this and related models predicted very low firing variability (Cv << 1) for realistic EPSP depolarizations and membrane time constants. We also simulated a biophysically very detailed compartmental model of an anatomically reconstructed and physiologically characterized layer V cat pyramidal cell (Douglas et al., 1991) with passive dendrites and active soma. If independent, excitatory synaptic input fired the model cell at the high rates observed in monkey, the Cv and the variability in the number of spikes were both very low, in agreement with the integrate-and-fire models but in strong disagreement with the majority of our monkey data. The simulated cell only produced highly variable firing when Hodgkin-Huxley-like currents (INa and very strong IDR) were placed on distal dendrites. Now the simulated neuron acted more as a millisecond-resolution detector of dendritic spike coincidences than as a temporal integrator. We argue that neurons that act as temporal integrators over many synaptic inputs must fire very regularly. Only in the presence of either fast and strong dendritic nonlinearities or strong synchronization among individual synaptic events will the degree of predicted variability approach that of real cortical neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00334.1993

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Abeles M (1990) Corticonics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  2. Amitai Y, Friedman A, Connors B, Gutnick M ( 1992) Regenerative electrical activity in apical dendrites of pyramidal cells in neocortex. 1 Neurophysiol, in press.
  3. Bugmann G ( 1990) Irregularity of natural spike trains simulated by an integrate-and-fire neuron. In: Extended abstracts, 3rd International Symposium on Bioelectronic and Molecular Electronic Devices, pp 105-106. Toranomon, Japan: FED.
  4. Bugmann G ( 1991) Neural information carried by one spike. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2d Australian Conference on Neural Networks (ACNN'91) (
  5. Cinlar E ( 1972) Superposition of point processes. In: Stochastic point processes (Lewis PAW, ed), pp 549-606. New York: Wiley.
  6. Strassberg A, DeFelice L (in press) Limitations of the Hodgkin-Huxley formalism. Neural Comput, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Softky, W., & Koch, C.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
334-350
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2172294131
Cited by
1,689
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 69
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
coefficient of variation, interspike intervals, primary visual cortex, leaky integrate-and-fire model, temporal integration, dendritic nonlinearities, synaptic input, macaque
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Dendrites, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Synapses, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review