The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chaste: An Open Source C++ Library for Computational Physiology and Biology
Open accessAbstract
Chaste - Cancer, Heart And Soft Tissue Environment - is an open source C++ library for the computational simulation of mathematical models developed for physiology and biology. Code development has been driven by two initial applications: cardiac electrophysiology and cancer development. A large number of cardiac electrophysiology studies have been enabled and performed, including high-performance computational investigations of defibrillation on realistic human cardiac geometries. New models for the initiation and growth of tumours have been developed. In particular, cell-based simulations have provided novel insight into the role of stem cells in the colorectal crypt. Chaste is constantly evolving and is now being applied to a far wider range of problems. The code provides modules for handling common scientific computing components, such as meshes and solvers for ordinary and partial differential equations (ODEs/PDEs). Re-use of these components avoids the need for researchers to 're-invent the wheel' with each new project, accelerating the rate of progress in new applications. Chaste is developed using industrially-derived techniques, in particular test-driven development, to ensure code quality, re-use and reliability. In this article we provide examples that illustrate the types of problems Chaste can be used to solve, which can be run on a desktop computer. We highlight some scientific studies that have used or are using Chaste, and the insights they have provided. The source code, both for specific releases and the development version, is available to download under an open source Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) licence at http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/chaste, together with details of a mailing list and links to documentation and tutorials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator
Shewchuk, J. R. (1996) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0014497 · Cited by 2,115
Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N -version benchmark
Niederer, S. A., Kerfoot, E., Benson, A. P., Bernabeu, M. O., Bernus, O., Bradley, C., Cherry, E. M., Clayton, R., Fenton, F. H., Garny, A., et al. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0139 · Cited by 275
Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE)
Waltemath, D., Adams, R., Beard, D. A., Bergmann, F. T., Bhalla, U. S., Britten, R., Chelliah, V., Cooling, M. T., Cooper, J., Crampin, E. J., et al. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001122 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Cited by
Linking pattern completion in the hippocampus to predictive coding in visual cortex
Hindy, N. C., Ng, F. Y., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4284 · Cited by 246
Agent-based modelling in synthetic biology
Gorochowski, T. E. (2016) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20160037 · Cited by 86
Recent developments in using mechanistic cardiac modelling for drug safety evaluation
Davies, M. R., Wang, K., Mirams, G. R., Caruso, A., Noble, D., Walz, A., Lavé, T., Schuler, F., Singer, T., & Polonchuk, L. (2016) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.02.003 · Cited by 66
Self-citationGalappaththige, S., Gray, R. A., Costa, C. M., Niederer, S., & Pathmanathan, P. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010541 · Cited by 45
Where next for the reproducibility agenda in computational biology?
Lewis, J., Breeze, C. E., Charlesworth, J., Maclaren, O. J., & Cooper, J. (2016) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0288-x · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirams, G. R., Arthurs, C. J., Bernabeu, M. O., Bordas, R., Cooper, J., Corrias, A., Davit, Y., Dunn, S.-J., Fletcher, A. G., Harvey, D. G., Marsh, M. E., Osborne, J. M., Pathmanathan, P., Pitt-Francis, J., Southern, J., Zemzemi, N., & Gavaghan, D. J.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-03-14
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1002970
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2272546316
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 43.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.