The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction
Open accessAbstract
Finding where transcription factors (TFs) bind to the DNA is of key importance to decipher gene regulation at a transcriptional level. Classically, computational prediction of TF binding sites (TFBSs) is based on basic position weight matrices (PWMs) which quantitatively score binding motifs based on the observed nucleotide patterns in a set of TFBSs for the corresponding TF. Such models make the strong assumption that each nucleotide participates independently in the corresponding DNA-protein interaction and do not account for flexible length motifs. We introduce transcription factor flexible models (TFFMs) to represent TF binding properties. Based on hidden Markov models, TFFMs are flexible, and can model both position interdependence within TFBSs and variable length motifs within a single dedicated framework. The availability of thousands of experimentally validated DNA-TF interaction sequences from ChIP-seq allows for the generation of models that perform as well as PWMs for stereotypical TFs and can improve performance for TFs with flexible binding characteristics. We present a new graphical representation of the motifs that convey properties of position interdependence. TFFMs have been assessed on ChIP-seq data sets coming from the ENCODE project, revealing that they can perform better than both PWMs and the dinucleotide weight matrix extension in discriminating ChIP-seq from background sequences. Under the assumption that ChIP-seq signal values are correlated with the affinity of the TF-DNA binding, we find that TFFM scores correlate with ChIP-seq peak signals. Moreover, using available TF-DNA affinity measurements for the Max TF, we demonstrate that TFFMs constructed from ChIP-seq data correlate with published experimentally measured DNA-binding affinities. Finally, TFFMs allow for the straightforward computation of an integrated TF occupancy score across a sequence. These results demonstrate the capacity of TFFMs to accurately model DNA-protein interactions, while providing a single unified framework suitable for the next generation of TFBS prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Biopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics
Cock, P. J. A., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., Chapman, B. A., Cox, C. J., Dalke, A., Friedberg, I., Hamelryck, T., Kauff, F., Wilczynski, B., et al. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · Cited by 6,080
Luscombe, N. M. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.13.2860 · Cited by 981
Evaluation of methods for modeling transcription factor sequence specificity
DREAM5 Consortium, Weirauch, M. T., Cote, A., Norel, R., Annala, M., Zhao, Y., Riley, T. R., Saez-Rodriguez, J., Cokelaer, T., Vedenko, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2486 · Cited by 381
DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins
Ehret, G. B., Reichenbach, P., Schindler, U., Horvath, C. M., Fritz, S., Nabholz, M., & Bucher, P. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m001748200 · Cited by 369
Cited by
JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Riudavets-Puig, R., Rauluseviciute, I., Berhanu Lemma, R., Turchi, L., Blanc-Mathieu, R., Lucas, J., Boddie, P., Khan, A., Manosalva Pérez, N., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1113 · Cited by 1,935
Self-citationJASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Fornes, O., Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Khan, A., van der Lee, R., Zhang, X., Richmond, P. A., Modi, B. P., Correard, S., Gheorghe, M., Baranašić, D., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1001 · Cited by 1,763
Self-citationMathelier, A., Fornes, O., Arenillas, D. J., Chen, C.-Y., Denay, G., Lee, J., Shi, W., Shyr, C., Tan, G., Worsley-Hunt, R., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1176 · Cited by 937
Self-citationAbsence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome
Slattery, M., Zhou, T., Yang, L., Dantas Machado, A. C., Gordân, R., & Rohs, R. (2014) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.07.002 · Cited by 537
Protein-DNA binding: complexities and multi-protein codes
Siggers, T., & Gordân, R. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1112 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathelier, A., & Wasserman, W. W.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1003214
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2029201460
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003214
- The paper
- Mathelier, A., & Wasserman, W. W. (2013). The Next Generation of Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.