Cited by 18Evolution and Genetic DynamicsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Phenotypic delay in the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance: Mechanistic models and their implications

Open access
Carballo-Pacheco, Martín, Nicholson, Michael D., Lilja, Elin E., Allen, Rosalind J., Waclaw, Bartlomiej·2020·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Phenotypic delay – the time delay between genetic mutation and expression of the corresponding phenotype – is generally neglected in evolutionary models, yet recent work suggests that it may be more common than previously assumed. Here, we use computer simulations and theory to investigate the significance of phenotypic delay for the evolution of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. We consider three mechanisms which could potentially cause phenotypic delay: effective polyploidy, dilution of antibiotic-sensitive molecules and accumulation of resistance-enhancing molecules. We find that the accumulation of resistant molecules is relevant only within a narrow parameter range, but both the dilution of sensitive molecules and effective polyploidy can cause phenotypic delay over a wide range of parameters. We further investigate whether these mechanisms could affect population survival under drug treatment and thereby explain observed discrepancies in mutation rates estimated by Luria-Delbrück fluctuation tests. While the effective polyploidy mechanism does not affect population survival, the dilution of sensitive molecules leads both to decreased probability of survival under drug treatment and underestimation of mutation rates in fluctuation tests. The dilution mechanism also changes the shape of the Luria-Delbrück distribution of mutant numbers, and we show that this modified distribution provides an improved fit to previously published experimental data. Author Summary Understanding precisely how some bacteria survive exposure to antibiotics is a major research focus. Specific mutations in the bacterial genome are known to provide protection. However, it remains unclear how much time passes between a bacterium acquiring the genetic change and being able to tolerate antibiotics - termed the phenotypic delay - and what controls this delay. Here, using computer simulations and mathematical arguments we discuss three biologically plausible mechanisms of phenotypic delay. We investigate how each mechanism would affect the outcome of laboratory experiments often used to study the evolution of antibiotic resistance, and we highlight how the delay might be detected in such experiments. We also show that the existence of the delay could explain an observed discrepancy in the measurement of mutation rates, and demonstrate that one of our models provides a superior fit to experimental data. Our work exposes how molecular details at the intracellular level can have a direct effect on evolution at the population level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007930

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dynamics of mutant cells can be modelled by a simple birth-and-death process.

    “The dynamics of the mutant cells can be modelled by a simple birth-and-death process, as previously suggested [34,41,42,64,65].”

    From Efficient, robust, and versatile fluctuation data analysis using MLE MUtation Rate calculator (mlemur) (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Methods and models section (page unavailable) says the authors model mutated cells with an agent-based simulation in which cells divide. It does not describe that model as a simple birth-and-death process; a birth–death process appears only in the title of a work listed in the References. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 107 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Nowak MA. Evolutionary Dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2006.
  2. [71]Nicholson MD, Antal T. Universal asymptotic clone size distribution for general population growth. Bull Math Biol. 2016; 78: 2243– 2276. 10.1007/s11538-016-0221-x 27766475 PMC5090018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carballo-Pacheco, M., Nicholson, M. D., Lilja, E. E., Allen, R. J., & Waclaw, B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Allen, Rosalind J.
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
e1007930
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W3032723080
Cited by
18
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Royal Society of Edinburgh (Personal Research Fellowship)
  • European Research Council (682237)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (PhD studenship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
bacterial antibiotic resistance, resistance evolution, Luria-Delbrück fluctuation test, mutation rate estimation, mechanistic model
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Polyploidy, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review