Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era

Open access
Prem, Kiesha, Zandvoort, Kevin van, Klepac, Petra, Eggo, Rosalind M., Davies, Nicholas G., Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Cook, Alex R., Jit, Mark·2021·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mathematical models have played a key role in understanding the spread of directly-transmissible infectious diseases such as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as well as the effectiveness of public health responses. As the risk of contracting directly-transmitted infections depends on who interacts with whom, mathematical models often use contact matrices to characterise the spread of infectious pathogens. These contact matrices are usually generated from diary-based contact surveys. However, the majority of places in the world do not have representative empirical contact studies, so synthetic contact matrices have been constructed using more widely available setting-specific survey data on household, school, classroom, and workplace composition combined with empirical data on contact patterns in Europe. In 2017, the largest set of synthetic contact matrices to date were published for 152 geographical locations. In this study, we update these matrices for populations up to age 80 with the most recent data and extend our analysis to 177 geographical locations. Due to the observed geographic differences within countries, we also quantify contact patterns in rural and urban settings where data is available. Further, we compare both the 2017 and 2020 synthetic matrices to out-of-sample empirically-constructed contact matrices, and explore the effects of using both the empirical and synthetic contact matrices when modelling physical distancing interventions for the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that the synthetic contact matrices show qualitative similarities to the contact patterns in the empirically-constructed contact matrices. Models parameterised with the empirical and synthetic matrices generated similar findings with few differences observed in age groups where the empirical matrices have missing or aggregated age groups. This finding means that synthetic contact matrices may be used in modelling outbreaks in settings for which empirical studies have yet to be conducted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. OECD. Teachers by age (indicator). 2020. doi: 10.1787/93af1f9d-en · doi:10.1787/93af1f9d-en
  2. OECD, 2018, Differences in rural and urban schools’; student-teacher ratio and class size, 2015, 10.1787/9789264306707-graph12-en · doi:10.1787/9789264306707-graph12-en
  3. CMMID COVID-19 Working Group, 2021, Analysis data and code for “Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era., Zenodo

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Prem, K., Zandvoort, K. V., Klepac, P., Eggo, R. M., Davies, N. G., Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Cook, A. R., & Jit, M.
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
e1009098
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W3185461295
Cited by
268
References
60
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098
The paper
Prem, K., Zandvoort, K. V., Klepac, P., Eggo, R. M., Davies, N. G., Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Cook, A. R., & Jit, M. (2021). Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.