The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Mathematical models have played a key role in understanding the spread of directly-transmissible infectious diseases such as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), as well as the effectiveness of public health responses. As the risk of contracting directly-transmitted infections depends on who interacts with whom, mathematical models often use contact matrices to characterise the spread of infectious pathogens. These contact matrices are usually generated from diary-based contact surveys. However, the majority of places in the world do not have representative empirical contact studies, so synthetic contact matrices have been constructed using more widely available setting-specific survey data on household, school, classroom, and workplace composition combined with empirical data on contact patterns in Europe. In 2017, the largest set of synthetic contact matrices to date were published for 152 geographical locations. In this study, we update these matrices for populations up to age 80 with the most recent data and extend our analysis to 177 geographical locations. Due to the observed geographic differences within countries, we also quantify contact patterns in rural and urban settings where data is available. Further, we compare both the 2017 and 2020 synthetic matrices to out-of-sample empirically-constructed contact matrices, and explore the effects of using both the empirical and synthetic contact matrices when modelling physical distancing interventions for the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that the synthetic contact matrices show qualitative similarities to the contact patterns in the empirically-constructed contact matrices. Models parameterised with the empirical and synthetic matrices generated similar findings with few differences observed in age groups where the empirical matrices have missing or aggregated age groups. This finding means that synthetic contact matrices may be used in modelling outbreaks in settings for which empirical studies have yet to be conducted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y., Ren, R., Leung, K. S. M., Lau, E. H. Y., Wong, J. Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2001316 · Cited by 16,575
Ror2 signaling regulates Golgi structure and transport through IFT20 for tumor invasiveness
Nishita, M., Park, S.-Y., Nishio, T., Kamizaki, K., Wang, Z., Tamada, K., Takumi, T., Hashimoto, R., Otani, H., Pazour, G. J., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x · Cited by 15,947
Richardson, S., Hirsch, J. S., Narasimhan, M., Crawford, J. M., McGinn, T., Davidson, K. W., and the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium, Barnaby, D. P., Becker, L. B., Chelico, J. D., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6775 · Cited by 9,254
Chan, J. F.-W., Yuan, S., Kok, K.-H., To, K. K.-W., Chu, H., Yang, J., Xing, F., Liu, J., Yip, C. C.-Y., Poon, R. W.-S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9 · Cited by 8,944
Santos, A. G., da Rocha, G. O., & de Andrade, J. B. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 · Cited by 8,495
Wu, J. T., Leung, K., & Leung, G. M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30260-9 · Cited by 4,389
International Labour Organization
(2022) · Permanent Missions to the United Nations · doi:10.18356/9789210018289c229 · Cited by 4,331
Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis
Verity, R., Okell, L. C., Dorigatti, I., Winskill, P., Whittaker, C., Imai, N., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Thompson, H., Walker, P. G. T., Fu, H., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30243-7 · Cited by 3,660
Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases
Mossong, J., Hens, N., Jit, M., Beutels, P., Auranen, K., Mikolajczyk, R., Massari, M., Salmaso, S., Tomba, G. S., Wallinga, J., et al. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074 · Cited by 2,900
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- OECD. Teachers by age (indicator). 2020. doi: 10.1787/93af1f9d-en · doi:10.1787/93af1f9d-en
- OECD, 2018, Differences in rural and urban schools’; student-teacher ratio and class size, 2015, 10.1787/9789264306707-graph12-en · doi:10.1787/9789264306707-graph12-en
- CMMID COVID-19 Working Group, 2021, Analysis data and code for “Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era., Zenodo
Cited by
Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus
Bubar, K. M., Reinholt, K., Kissler, S. M., Lipsitch, M., Cobey, S., Grad, Y. H., & Larremore, D. B. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe6959 · Cited by 775
Age groups that sustain resurging COVID-19 epidemics in the United States
Monod, M., Blenkinsop, A., Xi, X., Hebert, D., Bershan, S., Tietze, S., Baguelin, M., Bradley, V. C., Chen, Y., Coupland, H., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe8372 · Cited by 331
The impact of COVID-19 on TB: a review of the data
McQuaid, C. F., Vassall, A., Cohen, T., Fiekert, K., COVID/TB Modelling Working Group *, & White, R. G. (2021) · The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · doi:10.5588/ijtld.21.0148 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Prem, K., Zandvoort, K. V., Klepac, P., Eggo, R. M., Davies, N. G., Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Cook, A. R., & Jit, M.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2021-07-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1009098
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W3185461295
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098
- The paper
- Prem, K., Zandvoort, K. V., Klepac, P., Eggo, R. M., Davies, N. G., Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, Cook, A. R., & Jit, M. (2021). Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: An update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.