Integrating AlphaFold2 models and clinical data to improve the assessment of Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) and their variants’ pathogenicity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Short Linear Motifs (SLiMs) are protein functionally relevant regions that mediate reversible protein-protein interactions. Variants that disrupt SLiMs can lead to numerous Mendelian diseases. Although various bioinformatic tools have been developed to identify SLiMs, most suffer from low specificity. In our previous work, we demonstrated that integrating sequence variant information with structural analysis can enhance the prediction of true functional SLiMs while simultaneously generating tolerance matrices that indicate whether each of the 19 possible single amino acid substitutions (SASs) is tolerated. However, the scarcity of representative crystallographic structures of SLiM-receptor complexes posed a significant limitation. In this study, we demonstrate that these interactions can be modeled using AlphaFold2 (AF2) to generate high-quality structures that serve as input for our MotSASi method. These AF2-derived structures show robust performance, both in reproducing known structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and in reflecting the deleterious effects of known sequence variants. This updated version of MotSASi expands the repertoire of high-confidence predicted SLiMs and provides a comprehensive catalog of variants located within SLiMs, along with their respective deleteriousness assessments. When compared to AlphaMissense, MotSASi demonstrates superior performance in predicting variant deleteriousness. By contributing to the accurate identification and interpretation of variants, this work aligns with ACMG/AMP standards and aims to improve diagnostic rates in clinical genomics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The high-confidence SLiM candidates and missense substitution matrices provided by MotSASi contribute to the clinical genomics community with tools to refine ACMG guidelines for variant interpretation [45].”
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, it has been documented that AF2 still struggles to accurately predict the conformation of intrinsically disordered protein regions, where, as previously mentioned, several SLiMs occur [44].”
A genomic mutational constraint map using variation in 76,156 human genomes
Chen, S., Francioli, L. C., Goodrich, J. K., Collins, R. L., Kanai, M., Wang, Q., Alföldi, J., Watts, N. A., Vittal, C., Gauthier, L. D., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06045-0 · Cited by 1,727 · see citing works
PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors
Sigrist, C. J. A. (2002) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/3.3.265 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Pejaver, V., Byrne, A. B., Feng, B.-J., Pagel, K. A., Mooney, S. D., Karchin, R., O’Donnell-Luria, A., Harrison, S. M., Tavtigian, S. V., Greenblatt, M. S., et al. (2022) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.013 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation
Lee, C. Y., Hubrich, D., Varga, J. K., Schäfer, C., Welzel, M., Schumbera, E., Djokic, M., Strom, J. M., Schönfeld, J., Geist, J. L., et al. (2024) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-023-00005-6 · Cited by 105 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…also been successfully applied to study domain–motif interactions in the context of neurodevelopmental disorders, although predictive accuracy was shown to decrease when full-length proteins containing the motif were used as input, highlighting the need for tailored fragmentation strategies [27].”
Systematic discovery of protein interaction interfaces using AlphaFold and experimental validation
Lee, C. Y., Hubrich, D., Varga, J. K., Schäfer, C., Welzel, M., Schumbera, E., Đokić, M., Strom, J. M., Schönfeld, J., Geist, J. L., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.07.552219 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Brunello, F. G., Erra, L., Nicola, J., & Martí, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Brunello, Franco Gino
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2025-08-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1012829
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC12338786
- OpenAlex
- W4412932813
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2025-08-11)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- short linear motifs, AlphaFold2, protein-protein interaction, variant pathogenicity prediction, single amino acid substitution, monogenic disorders, clinical genomics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Genetic Variation, Computational Biology, Amino Acid Substitution, Amino Acid Motifs, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review