Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the Mycobacteriophage Metaproteome: Phage Genomics as an Educational Platform

Open access
Hatfull, Graham F, Pedulla, Marisa L, Jacobs-Sera, Deborah, Cichon, Pauline M, Foley, Amy, Ford, Michael E, Gonda, Rebecca M, Houtz, Jennifer M, Hryckowian, Andrew J, Kelchner, Vanessa A, Namburi, Swathi, Pajcini, Kostandin V, Popovich, Mark G, Schleicher, Donald T, Simanek, Brian Z, Smith, Alexis L, Zdanowicz, Gina M, Kumar, Vanaja, Peebles, Craig L, Jacobs, William R, Lawrence, Jeffrey G, Hendrix, Roger W·2006·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Bacteriophages are the most abundant forms of life in the biosphere and carry genomes characterized by high genetic diversity and mosaic architectures. The complete sequences of 30 mycobacteriophage genomes show them collectively to encode 101 tRNAs, three tmRNAs, and 3,357 proteins belonging to 1,536 "phamilies" of related sequences, and a statistical analysis predicts that these represent approximately 50% of the total number of phamilies in the mycobacteriophage population. These phamilies contain 2.19 proteins on average; more than half (774) of them contain just a single protein sequence. Only six phamilies have representatives in more than half of the 30 genomes, and only three-encoding tape-measure proteins, lysins, and minor tail proteins-are present in all 30 phages, although these phamilies are themselves highly modular, such that no single amino acid sequence element is present in all 30 mycobacteriophage genomes. Of the 1,536 phamilies, only 230 (15%) have amino acid sequence similarity to previously reported proteins, reflecting the enormous genetic diversity of the entire phage population. The abundance and diversity of phages, the simplicity of phage isolation, and the relatively small size of phage genomes support bacteriophage isolation and comparative genomic analysis as a highly suitable platform for discovery-based education.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020092

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Hatfull, G. F., Pedulla, M. L., Jacobs-Sera, D., Cichon, P. M., Foley, A., Ford, M. E., Gonda, R. M., Houtz, J. M., Hryckowian, A. J., Kelchner, V. A., Namburi, S., Pajcini, K. V., Popovich, M. G., Schleicher, D. T., Simanek, B. Z., Smith, A. L., Zdanowicz, G. M., Kumar, V., Peebles, C. L., Jacobs, W. R., Lawrence, J. G., & Hendrix, R. W.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2006-06-09
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
e92
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2130661602
Cited by
279
References
1
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Mycobacteriophage Metaproteome: Phage Genomics as an Educational Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020092
The paper
Hatfull, G. F., Pedulla, M. L., Jacobs-Sera, D., Cichon, P. M., Foley, A., Ford, M. E., Gonda, R. M., Houtz, J. M., Hryckowian, A. J., Kelchner, V. A., Namburi, S., Pajcini, K. V., Popovich, M. G., Schleicher, D. T., Simanek, B. Z., Smith, A. L., Zdanowicz, G. M., Kumar, V., Peebles, C. L., . . . Hendrix, R. W. (2006). Exploring the Mycobacteriophage Metaproteome: Phage Genomics as an Educational Platform. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.