The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soft Sweeps III: The Signature of Positive Selection from Recurrent Mutation
Open accessAbstract
Polymorphism data can be used to identify loci at which a beneficial allele has recently gone to fixation, given that an accurate description of the signature of selection is available. In the classical model that is used, a favored allele derives from a single mutational origin. This ignores the fact that beneficial alleles can enter a population recurrently by mutation during the selective phase. In this study, we present a combination of analytical and simulation results to demonstrate the effect of adaptation from recurrent mutation on summary statistics for polymorphism data from a linked neutral locus. We also analyze the power of standard neutrality tests based on the frequency spectrum or on linkage disequilibrium (LD) under this scenario. For recurrent beneficial mutation at biologically realistic rates, we find substantial deviations from the classical pattern of a selective sweep from a single new mutation. Deviations from neutrality in the level of polymorphism and in the frequency spectrum are much less pronounced than in the classical sweep pattern. In contrast, for levels of LD, the signature is even stronger if recurrent beneficial mutation plays a role. We suggest a variant of existing LD tests that increases their power to detect this signature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure
Sabeti, P. C., Reich, D. E., Higgins, J. M., Levine, H. Z. P., Richter, D. J., Schaffner, S. F., Gabriel, S. B., Platko, J. V., Patterson, N. J., McDonald, G. J., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01140 · Cited by 2,106
Gene Losses during Human Origins
Wang, X., Grus, W. E., & Zhang, J. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040052 · Cited by 246
Cited by
The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K., & Coop, G. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055 · Cited by 932
“Although their prevalence is ultimately an empirical question, simple models suggest that, for plausible parameter values, soft sweeps are likely to be widespread [41,49].”
Detecting Natural Selection in Genomic Data
Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526 · Cited by 694
Marsden, C. D., Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D., O’Brien, D. P., Taylor, J. F., Ramirez, O., Vilà, C., Marques-Bonet, T., Schnabel, R. D., Wayne, R. K., & Lohmueller, K. E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1512501113 · Cited by 333
Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites
Karasov, T., Messer, P. W., & Petrov, D. A. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000924 · Cited by 257
Parallel adaptation: one or many waves of advance of an advantageous allele?
Ralph, P., & Coop, G. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.119594 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennings, P. S., & Hermisson, J.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e186
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2064947972
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.