The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recombinational Landscape and Population Genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans
Open accessAbstract
Recombination rate and linkage disequilibrium, the latter a function of population genomic processes, are the critical parameters for mapping by linkage and association, and their patterns in Caenorhabditis elegans are poorly understood. We performed high-density SNP genotyping on a large panel of recombinant inbred advanced intercross lines (RIAILs) of C. elegans to characterize the landscape of recombination and, on a panel of wild strains, to characterize population genomic patterns. We confirmed that C. elegans autosomes exhibit discrete domains of nearly constant recombination rate, and we show, for the first time, that the pattern holds for the X chromosome as well. The terminal domains of each chromosome, spanning about 7% of the genome, exhibit effectively no recombination. The RIAILs exhibit a 5.3-fold expansion of the genetic map. With median marker spacing of 61 kb, they are a powerful resource for mapping quantitative trait loci in C. elegans. Among 125 wild isolates, we identified only 41 distinct haplotypes. The patterns of genotypic similarity suggest that some presumed wild strains are laboratory contaminants. The Hawaiian strain, CB4856, exhibits genetic isolation from the remainder of the global population, whose members exhibit ample evidence of intercrossing and recombining. The population effective recombination rate, estimated from the pattern of linkage disequilibrium, is correlated with the estimated meiotic recombination rate, but its magnitude implies that the effective rate of outcrossing is extremely low, corroborating reports of selection against recombinant genotypes. Despite the low population, effective recombination rate and extensive linkage disequilibrium among chromosomes, which are techniques that account for background levels of genomic similarity, permit association mapping in wild C. elegans strains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrative Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome by the modENCODE Project
Gerstein, M. B., Lu, Z. J., Van Nostrand, E. L., Cheng, C., Arshinoff, B. I., Liu, T., Yip, K. Y., Robilotto, R., Rechtsteiner, A., Ikegami, K., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1196914 · Cited by 955
Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes
Stapley, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Johnston, S. E., Santure, A. W., & Smadja, C. M. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0455 · Cited by 507
The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans
Félix, M.-A., & Braendle, C. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.050 · Cited by 458
Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity
Andersen, E. C., Gerke, J. P., Shapiro, J. A., Crissman, J. R., Ghosh, R., Bloom, J. S., Félix, M.-A., & Kruglyak, L. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1050 · Cited by 403
Self-citationCeNDR, the Caenorhabditis elegans natural diversity resource
Cook, D. E., Zdraljevic, S., Roberts, J. P., & Andersen, E. C. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw893 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Rockman, M. V., & Kruglyak, L.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-03-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1000419
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2038489248
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinational Landscape and Population Genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000419
- The paper
- Rockman, M. V., & Kruglyak, L. (2009). Recombinational Landscape and Population Genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.