The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638
Open accessAbstract
Enterobacter sp. 638 is an endophytic plant growth promoting gamma-proteobacterium that was isolated from the stem of poplar (Populus trichocarpaxdeltoides cv. H11-11), a potentially important biofuel feed stock plant. The Enterobacter sp. 638 genome sequence reveals the presence of a 4,518,712 bp chromosome and a 157,749 bp plasmid (pENT638-1). Genome annotation and comparative genomics allowed the identification of an extended set of genes specific to the plant niche adaptation of this bacterium. This includes genes that code for putative proteins involved in survival in the rhizosphere (to cope with oxidative stress or uptake of nutrients released by plant roots), root adhesion (pili, adhesion, hemagglutinin, cellulose biosynthesis), colonization/establishment inside the plant (chemiotaxis, flagella, cellobiose phosphorylase), plant protection against fungal and bacterial infections (siderophore production and synthesis of the antimicrobial compounds 4-hydroxybenzoate and 2-phenylethanol), and improved poplar growth and development through the production of the phytohormones indole acetic acid, acetoin, and 2,3-butanediol. Metabolite analysis confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR showed that, the production of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol is induced by the presence of sucrose in the growth medium. Interestingly, both the genetic determinants required for sucrose metabolism and the synthesis of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol are clustered on a genomic island. These findings point to a close interaction between Enterobacter sp. 638 and its poplar host, where the availability of sucrose, a major plant sugar, affects the synthesis of plant growth promoting phytohormones by the endophytic bacterium. The availability of the genome sequence, combined with metabolome and transcriptome analysis, will provide a better understanding of the synergistic interactions between poplar and its growth promoting endophyte Enterobacter sp. 638. This information can be further exploited to improve establishment and sustainable production of poplar as an energy feedstock on marginal, non-agricultural soils using endophytic bacteria as growth promoting agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria
Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J. (1998) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532 · Cited by 1,466 · cited 1×
“Once established, they can enhance plant health and/ or growth by producing plant growth regulating compounds such as indole acetic acid (IAA), acetoin (3-hydroxy-2-butanone), 2,3butanediol and cytokinins, or metabolize compounds like phenyl acetic acid (PAA), gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) or the stress ethylene precurso…”
BackgroundMahaffee, W. F., & Kloepper, J. W. (1997) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s002489900050 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Multifaceted Interactions Between Endophytes and Plant: Developments and Prospects
Khare, E., Mishra, J., & Arora, N. K. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732 · Cited by 659
Approaches for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals
Bhargava, A., Carmona, F. F., Bhargava, M., & Srivastava, S. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.002 · Cited by 586
Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation
Lehman, R., Cambardella, C., Stott, D., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D., Buyer, J., Maul, J., Smith, J., Collins, H., Halvorson, J., et al. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7010988 · Cited by 449
Bruto, M., Prigent-Combaret, C., Muller, D., & Moënne-Loccoz, Y. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06261 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Taghavi, S., van der Lelie, D., Hoffman, A., Zhang, Y.-B., Walla, M. D., Vangronsveld, J., Newman, L., & Monchy, S.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-05-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1000943
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W1970329447
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000943
- The paper
- Taghavi, S., van der Lelie, D., Hoffman, A., Zhang, Y.-B., Walla, M. D., Vangronsveld, J., Newman, L., & Monchy, S. (2010). Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacterium Enterobacter sp. 638. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.