The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 55 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates
Open accessAbstract
Comparative genomic analyses of primates offer considerable potential to define and understand the processes that mold, shape, and transform the human genome. However, primate taxonomy is both complex and controversial, with marginal unifying consensus of the evolutionary hierarchy of extant primate species. Here we provide new genomic sequence (~8 Mb) from 186 primates representing 61 (~90%) of the described genera, and we include outgroup species from Dermoptera, Scandentia, and Lagomorpha. The resultant phylogeny is exceptionally robust and illuminates events in primate evolution from ancient to recent, clarifying numerous taxonomic controversies and providing new data on human evolution. Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered. Our resolution of the primate phylogeny provides an essential evolutionary framework with far-reaching applications including: human selection and adaptation, global emergence of zoonotic diseases, mammalian comparative genomics, primate taxonomy, and conservation of endangered species.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study presents a highly resolved molecular phylogeny of living primates based on new genomic sequence from 186 primates representing 61 genera, using 34,927 bp from 54 nuclear genes. It clarifies primate taxonomic relationships, divergence dates, and patterns of genome evolution including rate heterogeneity and insertion/deletion variation.
Key findings
- The phylogeny includes 191 taxa (186 primates representing 61 genera, about 90% of described genera) plus outgroups from Dermoptera, Scandentia, and Lagomorpha; 166 of 189 nodes (88%) have bootstrap values of 90–100% and Bayesian posterior probabilities of 0.9–1.0, with only 3 of 189 nodes collapsed into polytomies in bootstrap analyses.
- Strepsirrhini split from Haplorrhini approximately 87 MYA (node 185); tarsiers are supported as sister to Simiiformes (BS = 85 MP; 98 ML; 0.99 PP) to form Haplorrhini, and Dermoptera is affirmed as the closest mammalian order to Primates, followed by Scandentia.
- Platyrrhini diverged from Catarrhini roughly 43.5 MYA; within Cebidae, Cebus and Saimiri emerged about 20 MYA, followed by a lineage splitting to Callitrichinae and Aotus, with Aotus showing 15 synapomorphic indels, the most observed in Simiiformes, and Callitrichinae branching mirroring decreasing body size.
- Cercopithecoidea shows low divergence, especially Papionini; Cercopithecini divergence is nearly twice that of Papionini (mean branch length = 13.1 vs. 7.43, p<0.005), Homo-Pan genetic distance ranges from 6.92 to 7.90×10−3 substitutions/site, and the global nucleotide substitution rate is 6.163×10−4 substitutions/site/MY.
Methods
- New genomic sequence (~8 Mb) was generated from 186 primates representing 61 genera, with outgroups from Dermoptera, Scandentia, and Lagomorpha; 54 nuclear genes yielded a final 34,927 bp after correction for ambiguous sites from an original 43,493 bp per OTU.
- DNA was extracted from blood, buffy coat, hair, buccal swabs, tissues, or cell cultures, PCR-amplified, Sanger-sequenced, aligned with MAFFT, and edited with GBLOCK; partitions included X, Y, autosome, intron, exon, and UTR segments.
- Phylogenetic reconstruction used maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony in PAUP* and GARLI with bootstrap support (1000 MP, 100 ML), plus Bayesian BEAST analyses with an uncorrelated lognormal relaxed clock and nine fossil calibration points; indels were identified with FASTGAP and analyzed by regression and ANOVA.
Limitations
- The paper states that only 3 of 189 nodes are polytomies in bootstrap analyses (nodes 28, 38, 158), that Lemuriformes node 158 collapses into an unresolved trichotomy, that the origin of primates remains unresolved, and that computational constraints limited BEAST analyses to five different species sets.
- The text notes that approximately half of the 261–377 described primate species and 90% of genera are included, that the Y-chromosome tree is based on 127 males as a subset of 191 total taxa, and that some indels were in regions not amplified across all species.
- Evident from the text: despite overall high resolution, some nodes have low support (e.g., node 158; node 187 posterior probability 0.54), and several taxonomic controversies remain, including within Galago, Cercopithecus, and Asian Colobinae.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we provide strong evidence that strepsirrhines split with suborder Haplorrhini approximately 87 MYA (node 185).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Resolution of Early Primate Divergence
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Separate phylogenetic analyses of these data partitions are generally concordant.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, greater frequency of phylogenetic inconsistencies or unresolved nodes occur in these subset trees (Figures S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13), compared with the entire concatenated data set (Figure 2, Figure S1).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, only 3 of 189 nodes (nodes 28, 38, 158) are polytomies in the bootstrap analyses (Table 1 and Table 3; Figure 2, Figure S1).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The greatest proportion of phylogenetically informative sites occurred in Y-linked genes (56%) compared with regions sequenced from the X-chromosome (40%) and autosomes (42%) (Table 4, Table S4), a finding also observed in carnivores [6], [7].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ongoing speciation, reticulate evolution, ancient relic lineages, unequal rates of evolution, and disparate distributions of insertions/deletions among the reconstructed primate lineages are uncovered.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 60
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Rooted by Lagomorpha, the phylogeny affirms Dermoptera as the closest mammalian order relative to Primates, followed by Scandentia [16], [17].”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Dermoptera is the closest mammalian order to Primates;”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Resolution of Early Primate Divergence
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we provide new genomic sequence (∼8 Mb) from 186 primates representing 61 (∼90%) of the described genera, and we include outgroup species from Dermoptera, Scandentia, and Lagomorpha.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ancient lineage is monophyletic and defined by a long branch and eight shared insertions/deletions (indels) (node 144).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Resolution of Early Primate Divergence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The phylogeny is highly resolved, with bootstrap values of 90–100% and Bayesian posterior probabilities of 0.9–1.0 at 166 of the 189 nodes (88%)(Table 1, Table 2, Table 3).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and today consists of a single relict genus Daubentonia defined by a long branch with high indel frequency (N = 14) (Figure 2, Figure S1, Table S7).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 14Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Cebidae radiation initiated with the emergence of sister taxa Cebus (Cebinae) and Saimiri (Saimirinae) approximately 20 MYA (node 113), in agreement with other molecular studies [27]-[30].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27]-[30]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within Lorisidae, the four extant genera split into the African subfamily Perodicticinae (Arctocebus, Perodictus) and the Asian subfamily Lorisinae (Nycticebus, Loris) and are the most divergent within all of primates.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Next to radiate are the Atelidae (node 126), with the most basal lineage leading to Alouatta (howler monkeys), currently widely distributed from Mexico to northern Argentina, followed by the divergence of Ateles (spider monkeys) from South American lineage comprised of sister genera (node 121) of Lagothrix (woolly monkeys) and Brachyteles (muriquis).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A few indels (Table S5) define alternate evolutionary topologies, such as tarsiers aligned with Strepsirrhini (1 indel, ZFX) or Scandentia (1 indel, DCTN2), compared with those that support an ancestral grouping of Tarsiiformes +Strepsirrhini +Dermoptera +Scandentia (2 indels, PLCB4, POLA1).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Resolution of Early Primate Divergence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our data affirm the ancient split of Strepsirrhini, approximately 68.7 MYA (node 144), into the progenitors of Lemuriformes/Chiromyiformes (origin 58.6 MYA, node 174) and Lorisiformes (origin 40.3 MYA, node 184).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This branching pattern among families agrees with earlier nuclear gene segment findings [20] that differ from studies using mtDNA sequence and Alu insertion variation which were unable to resolve these hierarchical associations [19].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] JE Horvath, 2007, Primate comparative genomics: lemur biology and evolution., Trends in Genetics source
- Not checked yetcites [19] C Roos, 2004, Primate jumping genes elucidate strepsirrhine phylogeny., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lorisiformes evolution includes the radiation of Lorisidae (pottos and lorises, 37 MYA, node 179) and Galagidae (19.9 MYA, node 183) species.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evolution of the four Lemuriformes families began 38.6 MYA (node 173) with the emergence of Lemuridae, followed by Indriidae and a monophyletic lineage that split 32.9 MYA (node 152) to form the sister lineages of Lepilemuridae and Cheirogaleidae.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hierarchical branching order among the remaining Callitrichinae of Leontopithecus, Callimico, Callithrix and Mico mirrors decreasing body size and culminates with the smallest platyrrhine species, Cebuella pygmaea, as most derived.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Asian (tribe Presbytini) and African (tribe Colobini) genera are monophyletic (nodes 53 and 61, respectively), supporting earlier genetic findings [4], [40] over morphology-based taxonomy [2], [45].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] HJ Chatterjee, 2009, Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach., BMC Evolutionary Biology source
- Not checked yetcites [40] N Ting, 2008, Phylogenetic incongruence between nuclear and mitochondrial markers in the Asian colobines and the evolution of the langurs and leaf monkeys., Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution source
- Not checked yetcites [2] CP Groves, 2001, Primate taxonomy.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, the Presbytis lineage, distinguished by 3 indel events (node 56), diverged first within Asian Colobinae, followed by the odd-nosed group (Rhinopithecus, Nasalis, Pygathrix), Trachypithecus and Semnopithecus.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Colobinae radiation started approximately 12 MYA (node 42) with species adapted to an arboreal, leaf-eating existence.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Callitrichinae, Saguinus is the first to diverge with S. fuscicollis currently distributed south of the Amazon River.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aotus species divide into sister lineages, with the “grey-necked” species (A. trivirgatus + A. lemurinus griseimembra) distributed north of the Amazon River, and “red-necked” species A. nancymaae, A. azarae species and associated subspecies located most to the south (nodes 98, 101, 102).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cercopithecidae includes two subfamilies, Colobinae and Cercopithecinae, which diverged 18 MYA (node 62)”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Aotus lineage (node 98) radiated with unusually high numbers of synapomorphic indels (N = 15), the most observed in Simiiformes (Table 2 and Table 3)”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 15Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Subsequently, the genus diversified into northern (S. bicolor, S. midas, S. martinsi, S. geoffroyi, S. oedipus) and south Amazonian species (S. imperator, S. mystax, S. labiatus); a trend generally similar to findings based on mtDNA [33] and single nuclear genes [34].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] SJ Cropp, 1999, Historical biogeography of tamarins, genus Saguinus: The molecular phylogenetic evidence., American Journal of Physical Anthropology source
- Not checked yetcites [34] FC Canavez, 1999, Phylogenetic relationships of the callitrichinae (Platyrrhini, Primates) based on beta(2)-microglobulin DNA sequences., American Journal of Primatology source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Differences in behavior, morphology, karyology, and genetic data between the two island populations [2] support the taxonomic designation as two separate species of Bornean (P. pygmaeus) and Sumatran orangutans (P. abelii), and these designations are upheld by the data presented here.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] CP Groves, 2001, Primate taxonomy.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally arboreal, Miopithecus and Allenopithecus are early offshoots with respect to the two Cercopithecini subclades formed approximately 7 MYA.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cercopithecini (guenons, patas monkey, talapoin, green monkeys) include lineages rooted by divergent monotypic genera followed by more recent speciation, characterized by transition from an arboreal to a terrestrial lifestyle.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Based on 54 gene regions, Homo-Pan genetic distance range from 6.92 to 7.90×10−3 substitutions/site (P. paniscus and P. troglodytes, respectively), which is less than previous estimates based on large scale sequencing of specific regions such as chromosome 7 [50].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] N Elango, 2006, Variable molecular clocks in hominoids., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The branch forming the Homo and Pan lineage apart from Gorilla is relatively short (node 73, 27 steps MP, 0 indels) compared with that of the Pan genus (node 72, 91 steps MP, 2 indels)”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The global rate of nucleotide substitution across the entire primate phylogeny is 6.163×10−4 substitutions/ site/ MY, but exhibits significant heterogeneity across lineages (Figure 3) and among branches (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3; Tables S6, S7, S8).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Cercopithecus lineage (node 34) radiated after Miopithecus and retained an arboreal lifestyle.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, Nomascus species appear more recent than Symphalangus and Hylobates, with node divergence dates estimated at less than 1 MY (Table 3, Table S9, Figure 2).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, the phylogeny affirms Groves [2] proposal that Lophocebus and Theropithecus are distinct clades apart from Papio (nodes 18, 19), although the average nucleotide divergence among these three genera are generally less than between other recognized Papionin genera (Macaca, Mandrillus, Cercocebus) (Figure 2, Figure S1, Table 3, Table S9).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] CP Groves, 2001, Primate taxonomy.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One of the more familiar genera within Cercopithecoidea, Macaca (macaques) diverged 5.1 MYA and today is represented by an African lineage comprised of a single species M. sylvanus, and an Asian lineage consisting of well-defined species groups (fascicularis, sinica, mulatta, nemestrina, Sulawesi) inhabiting India and Asia, SE Asia and Sundaland [49].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] T Ziegler, 2007, Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary history of Southeast Asian macaques forming the M. silenus group., Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The eight species included in this study form three clades that coincide with genus designation (absent is Hoolock; nodes 64–69) that diverged rapidly 8.9 MYA.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genome divergence varies across primate lineages, with the least inter-specific differences observed in Cercopithecidae lineages and the most in Lorisidae”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second, rooted by Allenopithecus, forms a terrestrial clade of Erythrocebus patas and Chlorocebus species, with Cercopithecus l'hoesti separated the other Cercopithecus.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The highly endangered orangutan forms the single genus Pongo in subfamily Ponginae (nodes 75–76), the sister lineage to Homininae.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Hominoidea
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of the fascicularis group, which is split in this study whereby M. arctoides [fascicularis] is more closely aligned with M. thibetana [sinica] rather than M. fascicularis as expected, our data otherwise strongly support these macaque species groups (nodes 6, 11).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the New World, the phylogenetic placement of the unique, nocturnal Aotinae is unambiguously resolved, diverging rapidly after the sister lineage of Cebinae+Saimirinae and prior to the Callitrichinae within the family Cebidae.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Excluding the infraorders Tarsiiformes (25 indels) and Chiromyiformes (14 indels) due to statistically inadequate sampling, the indel frequency per branch varies by a factor of 20 (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3; Tables S7, S8, S9) with the greatest accumulation within Lorisidae (particularly Arctocebus calabarensis) and the least in Cercopithecidae (Figure 3).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, the pattern of divergence of Callitrichinae is correlated with a gradation in species size, supporting “phyletic dwarfism” [32], [35].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] SM Ford, 1992, Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys., American Journal of Physical Anthropology source
- Not checked yetcites [35] SM Ford, 1980, Callitrichids as phyletic dwarfs, and the place of Callitrichidae in Platyrrhini., Primates source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, the distribution of indels is ubiquitous in both coding and noncoding segments (Tables S4, S5, S6), but is markedly disjunct among primate lineages (Figure 3).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately half of the 261–377 species and 90% of the genera are included facilitating resolution of long-standing phylogenetic ambiguities.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Primate taxonomy has undergone considerable revision but current views [1]-[3] concur that 67–69 primate genera originated from a common ancestor during the Cretaceous/Paleocene boundary roughly 80–90 MYA.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1]-[3]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The exact number of primate genera is controversial and species counts range from 261–377 [1]-[3].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1]-[3]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An Eocene expansion formed the major extant lineages of 1) Strepsirrhini, which is composed of Lorisiformes (galagos, pottos, lorises), Chiromyiformes (Malagasy aye-aye) and Lemuriformes (Malagasy lemurs); 2) Tarsiiformes (tarsiers) and 3) Simiiformes composed of Platyrrhini (New World monkeys) and Catarrhini”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1]-[3]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Optimal resolution of this node is observed with exon sequences (Figures S8 and S9), indicating that intron sites may be saturated, while more conserved coding regions remain informative and reflect the ancient rapid radiation of Lemuriformes families.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Strepsirrhini
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inter-specific genetic differences are roughly half those observed among other colobine genera (Figure 2, Figure S1, Table 3, Table S9) and may indicate that recent speciation, taxonomic over-splitting, reticulate evolution, or a combination thereof, (e. g. see [40], [44], [46]) are common within the Asian Colobinae radiation.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] N Ting, 2008, Phylogenetic incongruence between nuclear and mitochondrial markers in the Asian colobines and the evolution of the langurs and leaf monkeys., Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution source
- Not checked yetcites [44] KP Karanth, 2008, Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of langurs and leaf monkeys of South Asia (Primates : Colobinae)., Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution source
- Not checked yetcites [46] KP Karanth, 2008, Primate numts and reticulate evolution of capped and golden leaf monkeys (Primates: Colobinae)., Journal of biosciences source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This phylogenetic depiction of Callitrichinae is concordant with several other morphological and reproductive traits [32], [35] related to dwarfism and perhaps reflects adaptive evolution selected by fluctuating resource availability within the Amazon and Atlantic coast rainforests [36].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] SM Ford, 1992, Systematics and body size: implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys., American Journal of Physical Anthropology source
- Not checked yetcites [35] SM Ford, 1980, Callitrichids as phyletic dwarfs, and the place of Callitrichidae in Platyrrhini., Primates source
- Not checked yetcites [36] M Moynihan, 1976, The New World primates : adaptive radiation and the evolution of social behavior, languages, and intelligence.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The unusual depth of divergence (i.e. sizeable nucleotide substitutions/site; high indel frequency) may exemplify adaptive speciation as Aotus are the only nocturnal Simiiformes [31], and thereby may have reduced competition with diurnal small-bodied platyrrhines inhabiting the same neotropical environments.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > New World Primates (Platyrrhini)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] F Ankel-Simons, 2008, Diurnality, Nocturnality, and the Evolution of Primate Visual Systems., American Journal of Physical Anthropology source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As odd-nosed species are not exclusively arboreal and folivorous, the results indicate either 1) morphological convergence between Presbytis with Trachypithecus and Semnopithecus, 2) adaptation for an expanded diet in the odd-nosed group, or 3) that a folivorous diet is a symplesiomorphic trait within Asian colobines.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reflecting recent speciation in the former and the more ancient origins of the latter (Figure 3, Table 1, Table 3, Tables S7 and S9).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This paraphyly, also reported in earlier genetic studies [39], [47], [48] and counter to initial morphological classifications [2], suggests taxonomic revision of Cercopithecus.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Old World Primates (Cercopithecoidea)
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] J Xing, 2007, A mobile element-based evolutionary history of guenons (tribe Cercopithecini)., BMC Biology source
- Not checked yetcites [47] AJ Tosi, 2004, Sex chromosome phylogenetics indicate a single transition to terrestriality in the guenons (tribe Cercopithecini)., Journal of Human Evolution source
- Not checked yetcites [48] AJ Tosi, 2003, Cercopithecine Y-chromosome data provide a test of competing morphological evolutionary hypotheses., Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, large-scale genome sequence analysis demonstrate that indel formation is an indicator of genome plasticity, positively correlated with adjacent nucleotide substitution rate [56], [57], gene segmental duplication, chromosomal position, hybridization between species and speciation, and is enhanced by molecular mechanisms of recombination among repetitive elements [58]-[60].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Genome Divergence, Rate Heterogeneity, and Indels
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] LC Zhu, 2009, Genomewide Association between Insertions/Deletions and the Nucleotide Diversity in Bacteria., Molecular Biology and Evolution source
- Not checked yetcites [57] DC Tian, 2008, Single-nucleotide mutation rate increases close to insertions/deletions in eukaryotes., Nature
- Not checked yetcites [58]-[60]
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“B) mean = 43.0 MYA, stdev = 4.5 for TMRCA of Simiiformes [79], [80]”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [79], [80]
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The ingroup is monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Resolution of the primate species phylogeny here provides a validated framework essential in the development, interpretation and discovery of the genetic underpinnings of human adaptation and disease.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A negative control (no template) was included in every WGA and was verified by downstream PCR and sequencing.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > DNA Specimens
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only PCR products that produced single bands were sequenced.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Amplification of Gene Segments
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Regions of sequence ambiguity within the alignment were identified by GBLOCK version 0.91b [72], and removed from subsequent phylogenetic analyses.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > DNA Sequence Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [72] G Talavera, 2007, Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments., Systematic Biology source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“consistent with reticulate evolution, recent speciation and possibly augmented by taxonomic over-splitting.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Support for nodes within the phylogeny used bootstrap analysis with identical settings established for each method of phylogenetic reconstruction and values greater than 50% were retained.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Primates
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A) mean = 40.0 MYA, standard deviation (stdev) = 3.0 for time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of galagids and lorisids [78]”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [78] ER Seiffert, 2003, Fossil evidence for an ancient divergence of lorises and galagos., Nature source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The ingroup is monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A parsimonious interpretation of the present data would suggest an Asian origin as the ancient Asian Tarsiiformes and the strepsirrhine Lorisinae are most basal and the closest relatives of primates, Dermoptera and Scandentia, are also exclusive to Asia.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Results/Discussion > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Multiple sequence files for each gene segment amplified were aligned by MAFFT version 6 [69], [70], imported into Se-Al ver 2.0a11 [71] and verified by eye.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > DNA Sequence Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69], [70]
- Not checked yetcites [71] A Rambaut, 2007, Se-Al. Sequence Alignment Editor.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, only indels that correctly conformed to the species associations of the primate phylogeny (Figure 2) were used and identified as a subset of synapomorphic events (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3; Tables S5, S6).”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Statistical Analyses of Insertion/Deletion Events among Primate Lineages
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Infrequently, some indels included in the analysis were positioned in regions that did not amplify across all species. In these cases, indels were identified as synapomorphic for a lineage providing ∼70% of the relevant species were successfully PCR amplified, and that species with missing sequence for the indel did not all occur on the same node within the lineage.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Statistical Analyses of Insertion/Deletion Events among Primate Lineages
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Log files from each run were imported into Tracer ver 1.4.1, and trees sampled from the first 1 million generations were discarded.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mixing of trees was assessed in Tracer by examination of ESS values.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, all indels were identified using FASTGAP on GBLOCKED alignments and verified by eye.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Statistical Analyses of Insertion/Deletion Events among Primate Lineages
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four to seven independent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs for each analysis were run for 20–100 million generations to ensure sampling of estimated sample size (ESS) values.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“A normal prior for the mean root height of 90.0 MYA with stdev = 6.0 was used based on molecular estimates of MRCA of all Primates [14], [82], [85].”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14], [82], [85]
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The ingroup is monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The calibration points selected are based on fossil dates that have undergone extensive review in previous publications and are supported by a consensus of paleoanthropologists.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysis of these parameters in Tracer suggested that the number of MCMC steps was more than adequate, with ESS of all parameters often exceeding 200, and Tracer plots showing strong equilibrium after discarding burn-in.”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“G) mean = 15.5 MYA, stdev = 2.5 for TMRCA of Hominidae [14]”
§ A Molecular Phylogeny of Living Primates > Materials and Methods > Bayesian Analyses of Primate Sequences: Posterior Probability, Node Support, and Divergence Dating
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] A Matsui, 2009, Molecular phylogeny and evolution of prosimians based on complete sequences of mitochondrial DNAs., Gene source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The ingroup is monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.
The paper relies on this without support.
Primate taxonomy is complex and controversial, with marginal unifying consensus on the evolutionary hierarchy of extant primate species.
“However, primate taxonomy is both complex and controversial, with marginal unifying consensus of the evolutionary hierarchy of extant primate species.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The phylogenetic hierarchy of primate species has only modest local (family and genus level) molecular resolution with little consensus on overall primate radiations.
“Markedly absent from these many advances however, is a formal evolutionary context to interpret these findings, as the phylogenetic hierarchy of primate species has only modest local (family and genus level) molecular resolution with little consensus on overall primate radiations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recent application of molecular genetic data to resolve primate systematics has been informative but limited in scope and constrained to specific subsets of taxa.
“Recent application of molecular genetic data to resolve primate systematics has been informative, but limited in scope and constrained to just specific subsets of taxa.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Whole genome sequencing of 12 primate species is now completed or nearly so.
“Although whole genome sequencing of 12 primate species are now completed, or nearly so, broader genome representation of man's closest relatives is necessary to interpret human evolution, adaptation and genome structure to assist in biomedical advances.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ingroup is monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.
“with the ingroup assumed to be monophyletic with respect to the outgroup.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Based on nuclear data, Callithrix separated from its sister clade of Mico and Cebuella 2.5 million years ago (Perelman et al. 2011), and the young age of Callithrix species probably has not yet allowed for the evolution of either distinct coadapted gene complexes or significant differences in allele frequencies between these species.”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Perelman et al. 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For example, C. penicillata diverged from its species C. jacchus less than a million years ago (Perelman et al. 2011), and these two species showed overlapping allele size frequencies and no diagnostic loci between the two species (loci with non-overlapping alleles between the two species) in a panel of 42 nuclear microsatellite loci (Malukiewicz 2013).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Perelman et al. 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“NWM comprise the parvorder Platyrrhini, and estimates based on molecular clocks suggest a divergence of this taxon from Old World primates and hominoids ~43 Mya”
From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Perelman et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Primates as an Order diverged from other mammalian forms approximately 80-90 million years ago (Mya; (Perelman et al., 2011)”
From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Perelman et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
A fourth node is marked as collapsed in bootstrap analyses
MinorThe text names only nodes 28, 38, and 158 as bootstrap polytomies, but Table 2 marks node 81 with Note A for both bootstrap analyses. Note A is defined as a node collapsed into a polytomy by bootstrap analyses.
“only 3 of 189 nodes (nodes 28, 38, 158) are polytomies in the bootstrap analyses”
“| 81 | 1.53 | 0.59 | 2.28 | 6.00 | 1.42 | 13.06 | 11.34 | 21 | 0 | Note A | Note A | 1.00 |”
Node 144 has eight indels in the text but nine in Table 1
MinorThe text assigns eight shared indels to node 144, whereas Table 1 lists nine indels for that node.
“eight shared insertions/deletions (indels) (node 144)”
“| 144 | 68.74 | 58.77 | 76.61 | 9.91 | 5.98 | 14.30 | 188.50 | 591 | 9 | 100 | 100 | 1.00 |”
Y-linked informative-site proportion is overstated
MinorTable 4 gives 1,312 informative Y-linked sites out of 2,630 Y-linked sites, or 49.89%, rather than the stated 56%. Its tabulated value of 55.59% is also inconsistent with those counts.
Reported 56 · recomputed 49.885932
“The greatest proportion of phylogenetically informative sites occurred in Y-linked genes (56%)”
Coding and non-coding lengths do not total the analyzed sequence
MinorThe stated coding and non-coding lengths sum to 31,927 bp, not the reported 34,927 bp analyzed.
Reported 34927 · recomputed 31927
“Roughly equal amounts of coding (14742 bp) and non-coding (17185 bp) genomic regions were sampled”
Citations
Cites
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820 · cited 1×
“7 [73] and the optimal model of nucleotide substitution was selected using the AIC criterion.”
MethodBEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees
Drummond, A. J., & Rambaut, A. (2007) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 · Cited by 13,104
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 1×
“3 [76,77].”
Talavera, G., & Castresana, J. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701472164 · Cited by 5,599 · cited 1×
“91b [72], and removed from subsequent phylogenetic analyses.”
BackgroundMammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference
Schmid, R., Wilson, D. E., & Reeder, D. M. (1993) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1223169 · Cited by 5,384
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program
Katoh, K., & Toh, H. (2008) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbn013 · Cited by 3,629 · cited 1×
“DNA Sequence Analyses Multiple sequence files for each gene segment amplified were aligned by MAFFT version 6 [69,70], imported into Se-Al ver Figure 2.”
MethodZwickl, D. J. (2006) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 3,108
Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-1281 · Cited by 3,008
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Phylogeny of the titi monkeys of theCallicebus molochgroup (Pitheciidae, Primates)
Carneiro, J. C., Júnior, J. D. S. E. S., Sampaio, I., Pissinatti, A., Hrbek, T., Messias, M. R., Röhe, F., Farias, I. P., Boubli, J. P., & Schneider, H. (2016) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22559 · Cited by 15
Molecular Basis for the Evolution of Species-Specific Hemoglobin Capture by Staphylococcus aureus
Choby, J. E., Buechi, H. B., Farrand, A. J., Skaar, E. P., & Barber, M. F. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01524-18 · Cited by 15
“Input phylogenies were based upon supported species relationships (47) as well as maximum likelihood gene phylogenies generated using PhyML with SPR topology search and 1,000 bootstraps for branch support (48).”
MethodJaniak, M. C., Burrell, A. S., Orkin, J. D., & Disotell, T. R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56941-7 · Cited by 15
Hu, Y., Huang, K. Y., Zeng, Q., Feng, Y., Ke, Q., An, Q., Qin, L., Cui, Y., Guo, Y. Q., Zhao, D.-C., et al. (2021) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.295 · Cited by 15
“Among nonhuman primates, the Old World monkeys of the Cercopithecidae family are well-established models to mimic humans in biomedical research such as drug testing.(21,22) Recently, Nakamura et al.”
BackgroundWilliams, S. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21451 · Cited by 15
do Nascimento, F. F., Lazar, A., Seuánez, H. N., & Bonvicino, C. R. (2015) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12448 · Cited by 15
“Interestingly, the monophyletic group comprising Mico, Callithrix and Cebuella diverged at approximately 5.0 Ma (Perelman et al., 2011), at a similar time to the divergence of Cebus from Sapajus.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe IgE gene in primates exhibits extraordinary evolutionary diversity
Wu, P. C., Chen, J.-B., Kawamura, S., Roos, C., Merker, S., Shih, C.-C., Hsu, B., Lim, C., & Chang, T. W. (2011) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-011-0586-9 · Cited by 15
Self-citationMorris, J. S., Cunningham, C. B., & Carrier, D. R. (2019) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.20980 · Cited by 14
“For all phylogenetic- informed analyses, we used a recent species-level Primates supertree (Perelman et al., 2011).”
MethodChallenges Facing the Study of the Evolutionary Origins of Human Right-Handedness and Language
Prieur, J., Lemasson, A., Barbu, S., & Blois‐Heulin, C. (2018) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-018-0038-6 · Cited by 15
“In particular, monkeys and apes are phylogenetically very close to humans (e.g., Perelman et al. 2011; Scally et al. 2012) and have complex social organizations (e.g., Aureli et al. 2008), a variety of parenting mechanisms (e.g., Geary and Flinn 2001), rich gestural communication (e.g., Call and…”
BackgroundScardino, R., Milioto, V., Proskuryakova, A. A., Serdyukova, N. A., Perelman, P. L., & Dumas, F. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11040383 · Cited by 14
Self-citationZMAT2 in Humans and Other Primates: A Highly Conserved and Understudied Gene
Baral, K., & Rotwein, P. S. (2020) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/1176934320941500 · Cited by 14
Computational molecular phylogeny: concepts and applications
Ojha, K. K., Mishra, S., & Singh, V. K. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89775-4.00025-0 · Cited by 14
Positive selection along the evolution of primate mitogenomes
de Menezes, A. N., Viana, M. C., Furtado, C., Schrago, C. G., & Seuánez, H. N. (2013) · Mitochondrion · doi:10.1016/j.mito.2013.06.001 · Cited by 14
“Differences between our mtDNA tree and the nuclear gene tree (Perelman et al., 2011) might have resulted from the different number of taxa included in analyses, changes in mutation rates, or selective forces.”
BackgroundSelf-citationRuiz‐García, M., Escobar-Armel, P., Leguizamón, N., Manzur, P., Pinedo–Castro, M., & Shostell, J. M. (2014) · Primates · doi:10.1007/s10329-014-0418-2 · Cited by 14
Weise, A., Kosyakova, N., Voigt, M., Aust, N., Mrasek, K., Löhmer, S., Рубцов, Н. Б., Karamysheva, T. V., Trifonov, V. A., Hardekopf, D. W., et al. (2015) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000381764 · Cited by 14
“…data did not change the suggestion that all hylobatid-specific rearrangements have a derived state and that these genomic changes have occurred after a common gibbon-ancestor split from the last common hominoid ancestor between 15 and 20 million years ago [Goodman, 1999; Perelman et al., 2011].”
BackgroundResultWard, J. M., Buslov, A. M., & Vallender, E. J. (2014) · PubMed Central · Cited by 14
Determined about sex: Sex-testing in 45 primate species using a 2Y/1X sex-typing assay
Choesmel, V., Bouakaze, C., Croze, M., Schiavinato, S., Tonasso‐Calvière, L., Gérard, P., Fausser, J., Gibert, M., Dugoujon, J., Braga, J., et al. (2014) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.09.010 · Cited by 14
Hibernation Patterns of Dwarf Lemurs in the High Altitude Forest of Eastern Madagascar
Blanco, M. B., & Godfrey, L. R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8175-1_2 · Cited by 14
“4, Groeneveld 2008; Perelman et al. 2011) show that the divergence and diversification of the genus Cheirogaleus is deeply embedded in the phylogeny of lemurs (around 22–25 mya) and there is no evidence of heterothermy in any of the ‘‘older’’ noncheirogaleid lineages.”
BackgroundCosta, D. C., de Assis, G. M. P., Souza-Silva, F. A., de Araújo, F. C. F., de Souza, J. C., Hirano, Z. M. B., Kano, F. S., de Sousa, T. N., de Carvalho, L. H., & de Brito, C. F. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131339 · Cited by 14
“Phylogenetic analysis of the sDARC fragment (aa 1 to 255) showed very good correspondence with highly resolved primate phylogeny [54].”
BackgroundA quick and robust MHC typing method for free-ranging and captive primate species
de Groot, N., Stanbury, K., de Vos‐Rouweler, A. J. M., de Groot, N. G., Poirier, N., Blancho, G., de Luna, C., Doxiadis, G. G. M., & Bontrop, R. E. (2017) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-016-0968-0 · Cited by 14
“An endangered lesser ape species, the silvery gibbon shares a common ancestor with humans ∼18–20 mill years ago (Perelman et al. 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialVariation in the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Gene in Primates
Rotwein, P. S. (2017) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2016-1920 · Cited by 14
“It has been calculated that humans and chimpanzees diverged from a common ancestor ;5 to 8 million years ago (34, 35).”
BackgroundAl-Razi, H., Hasan, S., Ahmed, T., & Muzaffar, S. B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676526.019 · Cited by 15
Monson, T. A., Brasil, M. F., Mahaney, M. C., Schmitt, C. A., Taylor, C. E., & Hlusko, L. J. (2022) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology11081218 · Cited by 14
Signatures of adaptive evolution in platyrrhine primate genomes
Byrne, H., Webster, T. H., Brosnan, S. F., Izar, P., & Lynch, J. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116681119 · Cited by 14
Contextualising primate origins – an ecomorphological framework
Soligo, C., & Smaers, J. B. (2016) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12441 · Cited by 15
Reid, M. J. C., Switzer, W. M., Schillaci, M. A., Ragonnet‐Cronin, M., Joanisse, I., Caminiti, K., Lowenberger, C. A., Galdikas, B. M. F., Sandstrom, P. A., & Brooks, J. (2016) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.036 · Cited by 14
“…to orangutans may have occurred, it seems likely that it occurred well after the separation of Borneo (P. pygmaeus) and Sumatran (P. abelii) orangutans, for which some of the earliest molecular date estimates are between 400 kya (Locke et al., 2011) and 1.31 mya (Perelman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialCezar, A. M., Pessôa, L. M., & Bonvicino, C. R. (2017) · Zoologia (Curitiba) · doi:10.3897/zoologia.34.e14881 · Cited by 13
“Results of the phylogenetic analysis supported the monophyly of Callithrix, as expected, based on previous phylogenies (Tagliaro et al. 1997, Perelman et al. 2011, Garbino 2015).”
Accelerated pseudogenization of trace amine‐associated receptor genes in primates
Eyun, S. (2018) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12543 · Cited by 15
“The current consensus for primate phylogenies with their approximate divergence times (MYA) was obtained from Perelman et al.(47) All species belong to Euarchonta except for the mouse (gray, Mus musculus), which is used as an outgroup.”
MethodResultConserved sequences identify the closest living relatives of primates
Zhang, M., Li, M., Ayoola, A. O., Murphy, R. W., Wu, D., & Shao, Y. (2019) · 动物学研究 · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.057 · Cited by 14
A human-specific VNTR in the TRIB3 promoter causes gene expression variation between individuals
Örd, T., Puurand, T., Örd, D., Annilo, T., Möls, M., Remm, M., & Örd, T. (2020) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008981 · Cited by 16
“The ancestors of hominins and chimpanzees split about 6 million years ago [57], and present-day humans diverged from Neanderthal and Denisovan lineages about 800,000 years ago [36, 58].”
BackgroundGenetic Signatures of Evolution of the Pluripotency Gene Regulating Network across Mammals
Endo, Y., Kamei, K., & Inoue‐Murayama, M. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa169 · Cited by 15
Pichon, F., Shen, Y., Busato, F., Jochems, S. P., Jacquelin, B., Grand, R. L., Deleuze, J., Müller-Trutwin, M. C., & Tost, J. (2021) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2020-0200 · Cited by 16
Recent Advances in Primate Phylogenomics
Pecon‐Slattery, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-022513-114217 · Cited by 15
Self-citationThe Functional Significance of Common Polymorphisms in Zinc Finger Transcription Factors
Lockwood, S. H., Guan, A. S., Yu, A. S., Zhang, C., Zykovich, A., Korf, I. F., Rannala, B. H., & Segal, D. J. (2014) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.012195 · Cited by 13
The Genome of Plasmodium gonderi: Insights into the Evolution of Human Malaria Parasites
Cepeda, A. S., Mello, B., Pacheco, M. A., Luo, Z., Sullivan, S. A., Carlton, J. M., & Escalante, A. A. (2024) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evae027 · Cited by 15
“16(2) https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evae027 Advance Access publication 20 February 2024 origin of primates (Perelman et al. 2011; Ksepka et al. 2015; Álvarez-Carretero et al. 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvolutionary Molecular Cytogenetics of Catarrhine Primates: Past, Present and Future
Stanyon, R., Rocchi, M., Bigoni, F., & Archidiacono, N. (2012) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000339381 · Cited by 13
“…in all studied Old World monkeys; therefore they accumulated during the 14-million-year span from the Hominoidea/Cercopithecoidea split ( 32 MYA) to the Cercopithecinae/Colobinae divergence ( 18 MYA) Catarrhine Chromosome Evolution Cytogenet Genome Res 2012;137:273–284 281 [Perelman et al., 2011].”
BackgroundThe Use (and Misuse) of Phylogenetic Trees in Comparative Behavioral Analyses
Pozzi, L., Bergey, C. M., & Burrell, A. S. (2013) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-013-9701-0 · Cited by 13
“3) (Harris and Disotell 1998; Keller et al. 2010; Olson et al. 2008; Perelman et al. 2011; Pozzi et al., unpublished data; Purvis 1995; Zinner et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHong, Y., Duo, H., Hong, J., Yang, J., Liu, S., Yu, L., & Yi, T. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3011 · Cited by 13
“The phylogenetic relationships of the Rhinopithecus genus have been studied (Karanth, Singh, Collura, & Stewart, 2008; Li et al., 2010; Osterholz, Walter, & Roos, 2008; Perelman et al., 2011; Sterner, Raaum, Zhang, Stewart, & Disotell, 2006); however, debates on the origin of R.”
BackgroundInfluentialSaraf, M. P., Balaram, P., Pifferi, F., Gămănuț, R., Kennedy, H., & Kaas, J. H. (2018) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24419 · Cited by 13
Genetic correlations in the dental dimensions ofSaguinus fuscicollis
Hardin, A. M. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23861 · Cited by 13
The Evolutionary Radiation of Hominids: a Phylogenetic Comparative Study
Rocatti, G., & Pérez, S. I. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51685-w · Cited by 15
Arenson, J. L., Sargis, E. J., Hart, J. A., Hart, T. B., Detwiler, K. M., & Gilbert, C. C. (2020) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24025 · Cited by 14
Ducournau, C., Cantin, P., Alerte, V., Quintard, B., Popelin-Wedlarski, F., Wedlarski, R., Ollivet-Courtois, F., Maltot, J. F.-P., Herkt, C., Fasquelle, F., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.02.003 · Cited by 10
Feeding and Resting Postures of Wild Northern Muriquis ( B rachyteles hypoxanthus)
Iurck, M. F., Nowak, M. G., Costa, L. C. M., Mendes, S. L., Ford, S. M., & Strier, K. B. (2012) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22085 · Cited by 13
“…evidence suggests that Brachyteles and Lagothrix are sister taxa to the exclusion of Ateles [Chatterjee et al., 2009; Meireles et al., 1999; Perelman et al., 2011; but see Collins, 2004], and that many of the suspensoryrelated postcranial osteological features shared by Ateles and…”
BackgroundStem members of Platyrrhini are distinct from catarrhines in at least one derived cranial feature
Fulwood, E., Boyer, D., & Kay, R. F. (2016) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.08.001 · Cited by 13
A Specialist Macaque MHC Class I Molecule with HLA-B*27–like Peptide-Binding Characteristics
de Groot, N. G., Heijmans, C. M. C., de Ru, A. H., Janssen, G. M. C., Drijfhout, J. W., Otting, Ń., Vangenot, C., Doxiadis, G. G. M., Koning, F., van Veelen, P. A., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700502 · Cited by 13
“ral habitat is mainly on the Asian continent, share a common ancestor from ∼25–33 million years ago with humans (1, 2).”
BackgroundCorrection: Evolution and Allometry of Calcaneal Elongation in Living and Extinct Primates
Boyer, D., Seiffert, E. R., Gladman, J. T., & Bloch, J. I. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/77784e61-3a43-4615-85bd-b6b4369568fd · Cited by 13
Human germline mutation and the erratic evolutionary clockPreprint
Moorjani, P., Gao, Z., & Przeworski, M. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/058024 · Cited by 13
Delgado, M. N., Gamarra, B., Nadal, J., Mercadal, O., Vila, O. O., Guàrdia, J., Pérez‐Pérez, A., & Galbany, J. (2015) · Folia Primatologica · doi:10.1159/000371633 · Cited by 12
“Compared with morphological dental characters, however, molecular studies have been more widely used as tools for taxonomic analysis [Chatterjee et al., 2009; Perelman et al., 2011].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSmith, H. F., & von Cramon‐Taubadel, N. (2015) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.016 · Cited by 12
Martins-Júnior, A. M. G., Sampaio, I., Silva, A., Boubli, J. P., Hrbek, T., Farias, I. P., Ruiz‐García, M., & Schneider, H. (2022) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107426 · Cited by 12
Self-citationContest Competition for Mates and the Evolution of Human Males
Puts, D. A., Carrier, D. R., & Rogers, A. R. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197536438.013.26 · Cited by 14
DNA methylation and transcriptome analysis reveal epigenomic differences among three macaque species
Wang, J., Liu, X., Lan, Y., Que, T., Li, J., Yue, B., & Fan, Z. (2023) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13604 · Cited by 15
“which diverged approximately three million years ago, they also ex - hibit significant phenotypic differences (Fan et al., 2014; Perelman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPatterns of MHC-G-Like and MHC-B Diversification in New World Monkeys
Ramos, J. S. L., & Cadavid, L. F. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131343 · Cited by 12
“Diversification of transcriptionally activeMHC-G-like andMHC-B loci in Platyrrhini In order to evaluate the diversity of transcriptionally active MHC class I loci in Platyrrhini, MHC-G-like and-B cDNAs were cloned and sequenced in a single individual from nine species from the families Atelidae (Ateles belzebuth, A. h…”
BackgroundInfluentialEvaluating the triplet hypothesis during rhythmic mastication in primates
Ram, Y., & Ross, C. F. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.165985 · Cited by 12
Patterns and magnitudes of craniofacial covariation in extant cercopithecids
Monson, T. A. (2020) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24398 · Cited by 12
Bowland, L. A., Scott, J. E., Kivell, T. L., Patel, B. A., Tocheri, M. W., & Orr, C. M. (2021) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103048 · Cited by 12
Grigorenko, A. P., Protasova, M., Lisenkova, A. A., Reshetov, D. A., Андреева, Т. В., Garcias, G. D. L., Roth, M. D. G. M., Papassotiropoulos, A., & Rogaev, E. I. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11030400 · Cited by 12
“A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed according to a previous study carried out on primates [24].”
MethodImpact of the Partitioning Scheme on Divergence Times Inferred from Mammalian Genomic Data Sets
Voloch, C. M., & Schrago, C. G. (2012) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.4137/ebo.s9627 · Cited by 12
The evolution of human synteny 4 by mapping sub-chromosomal specific probes in Primates
Dumas, F., & Sineo, L. (2014) · Caryologia · doi:10.1080/0144235x.2014.974357 · Cited by 12
“Primates species classification follows Perelman et al. (2011).”
Lei, R., Frasier, C. L., Hawkins, M. T. R., Engberg, S. E., Bailey, C. A., Johnson, S. E., McLain, A. T., Groves, C. P., Perry, G. H., Nash, S. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esw072 · Cited by 12
Chiatante, G., Capozzi, O., Svartman, M., Perelman, P. L., Centrone, L., Romanenko, S. A., Ishida, T., Valeri, M. P., Parker, M. R., & Stanyon, R. (2016) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-016-0619-0 · Cited by 12
Self-citationArchitectonic characteristics of the visual thalamus and superior colliculus in titi monkeys
Baldwin, M. K. L., & Krubitzer, L. A. (2018) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.24445 · Cited by 12
“Current evidence suggests that they shared a common ancestor with other New World monkeys about 25 million years ago (Perelman et al., 2011; Springer et al., 2012), but their lineage was the first to diverge from the New World line (Figure 1).”
BackgroundImmunoglobulin genes in Primates
Olivieri, D. N., & Gambón-Deza, F. (2018) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2018.07.020 · Cited by 14
Simons, E. A., Frost, S. R., & Singleton, M. (2018) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.001 · Cited by 12
Bernard, H., Matsuda, I., Hanya, G., Phua, M., Oram, F., & Ahmad, A. H. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316466780.014 · Cited by 12
Nonhuman primate alarm calls then and now
Fischer, J. (2020) · Animal Behavior and Cognition · doi:10.26451/abc.07.02.05.2020 · Cited by 12
“The last common ancestor of this species lived around 2.1 million years ago (Perelman et al., 2011; but see Warren et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialBabarinde, I. A., & Saitou, N. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa157 · Cited by 11
Ontogenetic allometry and scaling in catarrhine crania
Simons, E. A., & Frost, S. R. (2020) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.13331 · Cited by 12
“On the other hand, in their investigation of platyrrhine crania, Perez et al. (2011) found that size does not account for a large proportion of cranial shape variation once phylogenetic structure is considered.”
BackgroundMcCarthy, K. R., Timpona, J. L., Jenni, S., Bloyet, L.-M., Brusic, V., Johnson, W. E., Whelan, S. P. J., & Robinson‐McCarthy, L. R. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02772-20 · Cited by 12
Self-citationRespiratory Animal Models in the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)
Curths, C., Knauf, S., & Kaup, F. (2014) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci1010063 · Cited by 12
Prothmann, A., Laube, I., Dietz, J., Roos, C., Mengel, K., Zischler, H., & Herlyn, H. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.008 · Cited by 12
“verud (2002) and Perelman et al. (2011). Numbers (from left to right) specify SPAM1 d dN/dS of terminal (next to species names) and internal branches (next to nodes).”
BackgroundSelf-citationReproductive characteristics of N ew W orld monkeys
Martin, R. D. (2012) · International Zoo Yearbook · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1090.2012.00165.x · Cited by 12
Co-Opted Megasatellite DNA Drives Evolution of Secondary Night Vision in Azara's Owl Monkey
Koga, A., Tanabe, H., Hirai, Y., Imai, H., Imamura, M., Oishi, T., Stanyon, R., & Hirai, H. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx142 · Cited by 12
Discovery of a new repeat family in the Callithrix jacchus genomePreprint
Konkel, M. K., Ullmer, B., Arceneaux, E. L., Sanampudi, S., Brantley, S. A., Hubley, R., Smit, A. F. A., & Batzer, M. A. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.199075.115 · Cited by 12
“In this respect, the lineage leading to the common marmoset had at least 35 million years (Perelman et al. 2011) of platyrrhine-specific evolution (i.”
BackgroundInfluentialStatistical evidence for common ancestry: Application to primates: PRIMATE COMMON ANCESTRY
Baum, D. A., Ané, C., Larget, B., Solís-Lemus, C., Ho, L. S. T., Boone, P., Drummond, C. P., Bontrager, M., Hunter, S. J., & Saucier, W. (2016) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12934 · Cited by 11
Evolutionary analysis of apolipoprotein E by Maximum Likelihood and complex network methods
Benevides, L. D. J., de Carvalho, D. S., Andrade, R. F. S., Bomfim, G. C., & Fernandes, F. M. D. C. (2016) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2015-0164 · Cited by 11
The ultimate database to (re)set the evolutionary history of primate genital bones
Spani, F., Morigi, M. P., Bettuzzi, M., Scalici, M., Gentile, G., & Carosi, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-90787-2 · Cited by 11
Significant effects of host dietary guild and phylogeny in wild lemur gut microbiomes
Donohue, M. E., Rowe, A. K., Kowalewski, E., Hert, Z. L., Karrick, C. E., Randriamanandaza, L. J., Zakamanana, F., Nomenjanahary, E. S., Andriamalala, Y. R., Everson, K. M., et al. (2022) · ISME Communications · doi:10.1038/s43705-022-00115-6 · Cited by 11
Strongyloides in non-human primates: significance for public health control
Nosková, E., Sambucci, K. M., Petrželková, K. J., Červená, B., Modrý, D., & Pafčo, B. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0006 · Cited by 12
“Due to their close phylogenetic relationship [1], pathogens are easily transmitted between humans and other primates, especially great apes [2].”
BackgroundThe evolution of gestation length in eutherian mammals
Danis, T., & Rokas, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2024.1412 · Cited by 9
A cure for AIDS: a matter of timing?
Shytaj, I. L., & Savarino, A. (2013) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/1742-4690-10-145 · Cited by 11
“Our description is focused on the results that have so far been obtained in humans or SIV/SHIV infected macaques, which are, among the allowed animal models, those phylogenetically nearest to humans and most closely recapitulating the pathogenesis of human AIDS [14,15].”
InfluentialFrench, J. A., Frye, B. M., Cavanaugh, J., Ren, D., Mustoe, A. C., Rapaport, L. G., & Mickelberg, J. (2016) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-016-0081-y · Cited by 11
“Recent molecular phylogenies have placed this genus as a sister taxa of Callithrix [74, 75], suggesting that Callimico does not represent an ancestral callitrichine from which twinning species subsequently evolved but rather a derived species that lost the ability to produce twin litters.”
BackgroundHuq, E., Taylor, A. B., Su, Z., & Wall, C. E. (2018) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23405 · Cited by 11
“In the case of the species employed in this study, molecular phylogenetic analysis shows that families to which G. senegalensis (family: Galagidae) and N. coucang (family: Lorisidae) belong diverged approximately 40 million years ago (Perelman et al., 2011).”
BackgroundPositive selection drives the evolution of a primate bitter taste receptor gene
Dong, X., Liang, Q., Li, J., & Feng, P. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7440 · Cited by 11
“The incongruence between gene tree and species tree could be due to incomplete lineage sorting (Knowles, 2009; Pollard et al., 2006).”
BackgroundExamining the molecular basis of coat color in a nocturnal primate family (Lorisidae)
Munds, R. A., Titus, C. L., Moreira, L. A. A., Eggert, L. S., & Blomquist, G. E. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7338 · Cited by 8
“The resulting MT- CYB phylogenetic tree agrees with previous studies that found Lorisidae to be a monophyletic family with Galagidae (Galago) as a close sister taxon (Figure 6) (Munds et al., 2018; Perelman et al., 2011; Pozzi et al., 2014, 2015).”
MethodIdentification of a novel adenovirus in a cotton-top tamarin ( Saguinus oedipus )
Hall, N. H., Archer, L. L., Childress, A. L., & Wellehan, J. F. X. (2012) · Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · doi:10.1177/1040638711435809 · Cited by 11
He, K., Hu, N., Orkin, J. D., Nyein, D. T., Chi, M. A., Xiao, W. J., Fan, P., & Jiang, X. (2013) · Zoological Research · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1141.2012.e05-06e104 · Cited by 11
“The most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Semnopithecus and Trachypithecus was estimated to have existed at about 4.05 Ma (95% CI=2.93-5.36) (Perelman et al, 2011), so we set the prior as lognormal (mean=4.03, SD=0.18).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFunctional evolution of the OAS1 viral sensor: Insights from old world primates
Fish, I. H., & Boissinot, S. (2016) · Infection Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2016.07.005 · Cited by 11
Locomotion and Posture in Ancestral Hominoids Prior to the Split of Hylobatids
Nowak, M. G., & Reichard, U. H. (2016) · Developments in primatology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-5614-2_3 · Cited by 12
A diminutive Pliocene guenon from Kanapoi, West Turkana, Kenya
Plavcan, J. M., Ward, C. V., Kay, R. F., & Manthi, F. K. (2019) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.05.011 · Cited by 11
Resources for functional genomic studies of health and development in nonhuman primates
Jasinska, A. J. (2020) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24051 · Cited by 10
Byrne, H., Costa‐Araújo, R., Farias, I. P., da Silva, M. N. F., Messias, M. R., Hrbek, T., & Boubli, J. P. (2021) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-021-00249-9 · Cited by 11
“We also included a P. donacophilus sampled in Perelman et al. (2011) as an outgroup.”
An investigation of ecological correlates with hand and foot morphology in callitrichid primates
Smith, J. M., & Smith, A. C. (2013) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.22378 · Cited by 12
“Recent analysis of phylogenetic relationships in all primates (Perelman et al. 2011) further confirms the taxonomy described in Cortés-Ortiz (2009): (Saguinus (Leontopithecus (Callimico (Callithrix (Callibella (Cebuella/Mico)))))).”
MethodRapid Evolution of Primate Type 2 Immune Response Factors Linked to Asthma Susceptibility
Barber, M. F., Lee, E. M., Griffin, H., & Elde, N. C. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx120 · Cited by 11
“Unless otherwise noted, primate species phylogenies were used for downstream evolutionary analysis (Perelman et al. 2011).”
An in silico comparison of reduced-representation and sequence-capture protocols for phylogenomicsPreprint
Collins, R. A., & Hrbek, T. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/032565 · Cited by 11
Diogo, R., & Wood, B. A. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118524756.ch8 · Cited by 11
“Recent studies (e.g., Chatterjee et al. 2009; Cooper and Purvis 2009; Perelman et al. 2011) suggest that rates of both morphological and molecular evolution vary among taxa.”
BackgroundContagious yawning and scratching in captive lemurs
Lemes, W. P., & Amici, F. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77805-9 · Cited by 10
“Our findings suggest that behavioral contagion was already present not only in the common ancestor of Catarrhines and Platyrrhines 25 , but also before they evolutionary split from Strepsirrhines 15,67 .”
BackgroundMacrosystematics of eutherian mammals combining HTS data to expand taxon coverage
Feijoo, M., & Parada, A. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.004 · Cited by 10
Arruda, M. D. F., Yamamoto, M. E., Pessoa, D. M. A., & Araújo, A. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811829-0.00001-7 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Perelman, P., Johnson, W. E., Roos, C., Seuánez, H. N., Horvath, J. E., Moreira, M. A. M., Kessing, B., Pontius, J., Roelke, M., Rumpler, Y., Schneider, M. P. C., Silva, A., O'Brien, S. J., & Pecon-Slattery, J.
- Affiliations
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- German Primate Center (DE)
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
- Duke University (US)
- Université de Strasbourg (FR)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-03-17
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1001342
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC3060065
- OpenAlex
- W2144820135
- Semantic Scholar
- fe3c21d27cf4a3bb815467dcde063248e497b923
- Cited by
- 1,414
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 111 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 82
- FWCI
- 74.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (N01-CO-12400)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- National Institutes of Health (n01co12400-79-0-22, N01-CO-12400)
- National Cancer Institute (CO-12400, N01CO12400, N01-CO-012400)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- primate phylogeny, comparative genomics, primate taxonomy, human evolution, primate genomics, Dermoptera, tree shrew, lagomorphs, reticulate evolution, speciation, zoonotic emergence, endangered species conservation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Male, Phylogeny, Primates, Genetic Variation, Genome, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review