Cited by 152Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsDiabetes and associated disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transferability of Type 2 Diabetes Implicated Loci in Multi-Ethnic Cohorts from Southeast Asia

Open access

Abstract

Recent large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple loci which harbor genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), many of which encode proteins not previously suspected to be involved in the pathogenesis of T2D. Most GWAS for T2D have focused on populations of European descent, and GWAS conducted in other populations with different ancestry offer a unique opportunity to study the genetic architecture of T2D. We performed genome-wide association scans for T2D in 3,955 Chinese (2,010 cases, 1,945 controls), 2,034 Malays (794 cases, 1,240 controls), and 2,146 Asian Indians (977 cases, 1,169 controls). In addition to the search for novel variants implicated in T2D, these multi-ethnic cohorts serve to assess the transferability and relevance of the previous findings from European descent populations in the three major ethnic populations of Asia, comprising half of the world's population. Of the SNPs associated with T2D in previous GWAS, only variants at CDKAL1 and HHEX/IDE/KIF11 showed the strongest association with T2D in the meta-analysis including all three ethnic groups. However, consistent direction of effect was observed for many of the other SNPs in our study and in those carried out in European populations. Close examination of the associations at both the CDKAL1 and HHEX/IDE/KIF11 loci provided some evidence of locus and allelic heterogeneity in relation to the associations with T2D. We also detected variation in linkage disequilibrium between populations for most of these loci that have been previously identified. These factors, combined with limited statistical power, may contribute to the failure to detect associations across populations of diverse ethnicity. These findings highlight the value of surveying across diverse racial/ethnic groups towards the fine-mapping efforts for the casual variants and also of the search for variants, which may be population-specific.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001363

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Bivariate plots comparing odds ratios observed in each of the ethnic groups with odd ratios established in populations of European ancestry. (A) Chinese, (B) Malays, (C) Indians, (D) Combined meta-analysis. Each SNP is plotted with a colour that indicates if the SNP was identified through candidate gene studies (black) or linkage studies (red) or candidate-pathway analysis (green) or T2D genome-wide scans (blue).
Figure 1 Bivariate plots comparing odds ratios observed in each of the ethnic groups with odd ratios established in populations of European ancestry. (A) Chinese, (B) Malays, (C) Indians, (D) Combined meta-analysis. Each SNP is plotted with a colour that indicates if the SNP was identified through candidate gene studies (black) or linkage studies (red) or candidate-pathway analysis (green) or T2D genome-wide scans (blue).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Regional association plots of the index SNP in CDKAL1. For each ethnic group, the univariate analysis regional plot, A) Chinese B) Malays C) Indians, is shown together with analysis conditioned on established index SNP rs7754840, D) Chinese E) Malays F) Indians, in populations of Caucasian ancestry. In each panel, the index SNP is represented with a purple diamond and surrounding SNPs coloured based on their r2 with the index SNP. Estimated recombination rates reflect the local LD structure in the 500kb buffer around the index SNP and the proxies are plotted on Hapmap values from the Hapmap JPT+CHB. Data for gene annotations are obtained from the RefSeq track of the UCSC Gene Browser (See LocusZoom http://csg.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/ for more details).
Figure 2 Regional association plots of the index SNP in CDKAL1. For each ethnic group, the univariate analysis regional plot, A) Chinese B) Malays C) Indians, is shown together with analysis conditioned on established index SNP rs7754840, D) Chinese E) Malays F) Indians, in populations of Caucasian ancestry. In each panel, the index SNP is represented with a purple diamond and surrounding SNPs coloured based on their r2 with the index SNP. Estimated recombination rates reflect the local LD structure in the 500kb buffer around the index SNP and the proxies are plotted on Hapmap values from the Hapmap JPT+CHB. Data for gene annotations are obtained from the RefSeq track of the UCSC Gene Browser (See LocusZoom http://csg.sph.umich.edu/locuszoom/ for more details).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Regional association plots of the index SNP in HHEXX/IDE/KIF11. For each ethnic group, the univariate analysis regional plot, A) Chinese B) Malays C) Indians, is shown together with analysis conditioned on the index SNP rs6583826, D) Chinese E) Malays, F) Indians, found in meta-analysis across three ethnic groups and established index SNP rs1111875, G) Chinese H) Malays I) Indians, in populations of European ancestry.
Figure 3 Regional association plots of the index SNP in HHEXX/IDE/KIF11. For each ethnic group, the univariate analysis regional plot, A) Chinese B) Malays C) Indians, is shown together with analysis conditioned on the index SNP rs6583826, D) Chinese E) Malays, F) Indians, found in meta-analysis across three ethnic groups and established index SNP rs1111875, G) Chinese H) Malays I) Indians, in populations of European ancestry.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sim, X., Ong, R. T.-H., Suo, C., Tay, W.-T., Liu, J., Ng, D. P.-K., Boehnke, M., Chia, K.-S., Wong, T.-Y., Seielstad, M., Teo, Y.-Y., & Tai, E.-S.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Singapore National Eye Center (SG)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Teo, Yik-Ying
  • Tai, E-Shyong
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-04-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e1001363
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2025086473
Cited by
152
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (03/1/27/18/216)
  • National University of Singapore
  • National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF-RF-2010-05)
  • Genome Institute of Singapore
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council (09/1/35/19/616, NMRC/STaR/0003/2008, 03/1/27/18/216, 08/1/35/19/550, 0796/2003, STAR/0003/2008)
  • Biomedical Research Council (08/1/35/19/550, 03/1/27/18/216, 0796/2003, 09/1/35/19/616)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R56HG000376, R01HG000376)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, genetic susceptibility loci, multi-ethnic cohort, Chinese, Malay language, Asian Indians, CDKAL1, population-specific variants, allelic heterogeneity, linkage disequilibrium, fine mapping, genetic architecture
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Asia, Southeastern, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, tRNA Methyltransferases, Linkage Disequilibrium, Case-Control Studies, Kinesins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review