The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
Estimating fine-scale recombination maps of Drosophila from population genomic data is a challenging problem, in particular because of the high background recombination rate. In this paper, a new computational method is developed to address this challenge. Through an extensive simulation study, it is demonstrated that the method allows more accurate inference, and exhibits greater robustness to the effects of natural selection and noise, compared to a well-used previous method developed for studying fine-scale recombination rate variation in the human genome. As an application, a genome-wide analysis of genetic variation data is performed for two Drosophila melanogaster populations, one from North America (Raleigh, USA) and the other from Africa (Gikongoro, Rwanda). It is shown that fine-scale recombination rate variation is widespread throughout the D. melanogaster genome, across all chromosomes and in both populations. At the fine-scale, a conservative, systematic search for evidence of recombination hotspots suggests the existence of a handful of putative hotspots each with at least a tenfold increase in intensity over the background rate. A wavelet analysis is carried out to compare the estimated recombination maps in the two populations and to quantify the extent to which recombination rates are conserved. In general, similarity is observed at very broad scales, but substantial differences are seen at fine scales. The average recombination rate of the X chromosome appears to be higher than that of the autosomes in both populations, and this pattern is much more pronounced in the African population than the North American population. The correlation between various genomic features-including recombination rates, diversity, divergence, GC content, gene content, and sequence quality-is examined using the wavelet analysis, and it is shown that the most notable difference between D. melanogaster and humans is in the correlation between recombination and diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis
Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. (1998) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:apgtwa>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 14,890
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series
Grinsted, A., Moore, J. C., & Jevrejeva, S. (2004) · Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics · doi:10.5194/npg-11-561-2004 · Cited by 6,285
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination
GREEN, P. J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · Cited by 5,930
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
WAVELET TRANSFORMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO TURBULENCE
Farge, M. (1992) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.002143 · Cited by 3,062
Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10231 · Cited by 2,590
The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel
Mackay, T. F. C., Richards, S., Stone, E. A., Barbadilla, A., Ayroles, J. F., Zhu, D., Casillas, S., Han, Y., Magwire, M. M., Cridland, J. M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10811 · Cited by 1,656
A Fine-Scale Map of Recombination Rates and Hotspots Across the Human Genome
Myers, S., Bottolo, L., Freeman, C., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117196 · Cited by 1,134
PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice
Baudat, F., Buard, J., Grey, C., Fledel-Alon, A., Ober, C., Przeworski, M., Coop, G., & de Massy, B. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183439 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes
Stapley, J., Feulner, P. G. D., Johnston, S. E., Santure, A. W., & Smadja, C. M. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0455 · Cited by 507
Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes
Schumer, M., Xu, C., Powell, D. L., Durvasula, A., Skov, L., Holland, C., Blazier, J. C., Sankararaman, S., Andolfatto, P., Rosenthal, G. G., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3684 · Cited by 412
Stable recombination hotspots in birds
Singhal, S., Leffler, E. M., Sannareddy, K., Turner, I., Venn, O., Hooper, D. M., Strand, A. I., Li, Q., Raney, B., Balakrishnan, C. N., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad0843 · Cited by 344
Recombination rate variation shapes barriers to introgression across butterfly genomes
Martin, S. H., Davey, J. W., Salazar, C., & Jiggins, C. D. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006288 · Cited by 320
Pool, J. E., Corbett-Detig, R. B., Sugino, R. P., Stevens, K. A., Cardeno, C. M., Crepeau, M. W., Duchen, P., Emerson, J. J., Saelao, P., Begun, D. J., et al. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003080 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, A. H., Jenkins, P. A., & Song, Y. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-12-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1003090
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2005739865
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-Wide Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003090
- The paper
- Chan, A. H., Jenkins, P. A., & Song, Y. S. (2012). Genome-Wide Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.