CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling 3D Facial Shape from DNA

Claes, Peter, Liberton, Denise K., Daniels, Katleen, Rosana, Kerri Matthes, Quillen, Ellen E., Pearson, Laurel N., McEvoy, Brian, Bauchet, Marc, Zaidi, Arslan A., Yao, Wei, Tang, Hua, Barsh, Gregory S., Absher, Devin M., Puts, David A., Rocha, Jorge, Beleza, Sandra, Pereira, Rinaldo W., Baynam, Gareth, Suetens, Paul, Vandermeulen, Dirk, Wagner, Jennifer K., Boster, James S., Shriver, Mark D.·2014·PLoS Genetics
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224PMC PMC3961191
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Claes et al. (2014) limited the age of their participants to between 18 and 40 to minimize age-related variation in facial morphology.

    “Some quantitative approaches do not explicitly represent facial aging: For instance, in their landmark paper on modeling facial appearance from DNA, Claes et al. (2014) limited the age of their participants to the ages between 18 and 40 to “minimize age‐related variation in facial morphology” (p. 10).”

    From Facial aging trajectories: A common shape pattern in male and female faces is disrupted after menopause (2019) · cites this paper as Claes et al. (2014)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. DS Carlson, 2005, Theories of craniofacial growth in the postgenomic era, Seminars in Orthodontics, 11, 172, 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.07.002 · DOI
  2. SE Williams, 2010, Regional shape change in adult facial bone curvature with age, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 437, 10.1002/ajpa.21332 · DOI
  3. AK Coussens, 2005, Linkage disequilibrium analysis identifies an FGFR1 haplotype-tag SNP associated with normal variation in craniofacial shape, Genomics, 85, 563, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.02.002 · DOI
  4. S Boehringer, 2011, Genetic determination of human facial morphology: links between cleft-lips and normal variation, European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 1192, 10.1038/ejhg.2011.110 · DOI
  5. L Paternoster, 2012, Genome-wide association study of three-dimensional facial morphology identifies a variant in PAX3 associated with nasion position, American Journal of Human Genetics, 90, 478, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.12.021 · DOI
  6. P Claes, 2011, Spatially-dense 3D facial asymmetry assessment in both typical and disordered growth, Journal of Anatomy, 219, 444, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01411.x · DOI
  7. P Claes, 2012, Improved facial outcome assessment using a 3D anthropometric mask, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 324, 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.019 · DOI
  8. H Abdi, 2010, Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS Regression), Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2, 97, 10.1002/wics.51 · DOI
  9. JC Long, 1991, The genetic structure of admixed populations, Genetics, 127, 417, 10.1093/genetics/127.2.417 · DOI
  10. CL Pfaff, 2001, Population structure in admixed populations: effect of admixture dynamics on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium, American Journal of Human Genetics, 68, 198, 10.1086/316935 · DOI
  11. PM McKeigue, 2005, Prospects for admixture mapping of complex traits, American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 1, 10.1086/426949 · DOI
  12. CJ Hoggart, 2003, Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations, American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 1492, 10.1086/375613 · DOI · Paper page
  13. CJ Hoggart, 2004, Design and analysis of admixture mapping studies, American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 965, 10.1086/420855 · DOI
  14. CP Klingenberg, 2002, Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry, Evolution, 56, 1909, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00117.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. MA Webster, 2004, Adaptation to natural facial categories, Nature, 428, 557, 10.1038/nature02420 · DOI
  16. YC Klimentidis, 2009, Estimating genetic ancestry proportions from faces, PLoS One, 4, e4460, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004460 · DOI
  17. L Song, 2009, Lrp6-mediated canonical Wnt signaling is required for lip formation and fusion, Development, 136, 3161, 10.1242/dev.037440 · DOI
  18. H Tang, 2005, Estimation of individual admixture: analytical and study design considerations, Genetic Epidemiology, 28, 289, 10.1002/gepi.20064 · DOI
  19. MD Shriver, 2004, The genomic distribution of population substructure in four populations using 8,525 autosomal SNPs, Human Genomics, 1, 274, 10.1186/1479-7364-1-4-274 · DOI
  20. MO Kauer, 2003, A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the “out of Africa” habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 165, 1137, 10.1093/genetics/165.3.1137 · DOI
  21. F Tajima, 1989, Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism, Genetics, 123, 585, 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · DOI
  22. CP Klingenberg, 1998, Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods, Evolution, 52, 1363, 10.2307/2411306 · DOI
  23. P Mitteroecker, 2009, Advances in Geometric Morphometrics, Evolutionary Biology, 36, 235, 10.1007/s11692-009-9055-x · DOI
  24. Kimmerle EH, Jantz R (2005) Secular Trends in Craniofacial Asymmetry Studied by Geometric Morphometry and Generalized Procrustes Methods. In: Slice D, editor. Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. pp 247–263. · DOI
  25. AR Palmer, 1994, Waltzing with Asymmetry Is fluctuating asymmetry a powerful new tool for biologists or just an alluring new dance step??, BioScience, 46, 518

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Claes, P., Liberton, D. K., Daniels, K., Rosana, K. M., Quillen, E. E., Pearson, L. N., McEvoy, B., Bauchet, M., Zaidi, A. A., Yao, W., Tang, H., Barsh, G. S., Absher, D. M., Puts, D. A., Rocha, J., Beleza, S., Pereira, R. W., Baynam, G., Suetens, P., Vandermeulen, D., Wagner, J. K., Boster, J. S., & Shriver, M. D.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2014-03-20
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
e1004224
ISSN
1553-7404
DOI
10.1371/journal.pgen.1004224
PMC
PMC3961191
Cited by
202
References
9
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review