Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism of Suppression of Chromosomal Instability by DNA Polymerase POLQ

Open access
Yousefzadeh, Matthew J., Wyatt, David W., Takata, Kei-ichi, Mu, Yunxiang, Hensley, Sean C., Tomida, Junya, Bylund, Göran O., Doublié, Sylvie, Johansson, Erik, Ramsden, Dale A., McBride, Kevin M., Wood, Richard D.·2014·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Although a defect in the DNA polymerase POLQ leads to ionizing radiation sensitivity in mammalian cells, the relevant enzymatic pathway has not been identified. Here we define the specific mechanism by which POLQ restricts harmful DNA instability. Our experiments show that Polq-null murine cells are selectively hypersensitive to DNA strand breaking agents, and that damage resistance requires the DNA polymerase activity of POLQ. Using a DNA break end joining assay in cells, we monitored repair of DNA ends with long 3' single-stranded overhangs. End joining events retaining much of the overhang were dependent on POLQ, and independent of Ku70. To analyze the repair function in more detail, we examined immunoglobulin class switch joining between DNA segments in antibody genes. POLQ participates in end joining of a DNA break during immunoglobulin class-switching, producing insertions of base pairs at the joins with homology to IgH switch-region sequences. Biochemical experiments with purified human POLQ protein revealed the mechanism generating the insertions during DNA end joining, relying on the unique ability of POLQ to extend DNA from minimally paired primers. DNA breaks at the IgH locus can sometimes join with breaks in Myc, creating a chromosome translocation. We found a marked increase in Myc/IgH translocations in Polq-defective mice, showing that POLQ suppresses genomic instability and genome rearrangements originating at DNA double-strand breaks. This work clearly defines a role and mechanism for mammalian POLQ in an alternative end joining pathway that suppresses the formation of chromosomal translocations. Our findings depart from the prevailing view that alternative end joining processes are generically translocation-prone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004654

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Yousefzadeh, M. J., Wyatt, D. W., Takata, K.-I., Mu, Y., Hensley, S. C., Tomida, J., Bylund, G. O., Doublié, S., Johansson, E., Ramsden, D. A., McBride, K. M., & Wood, R. D.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e1004654
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W1976924852
Cited by
277
References
67
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism of Suppression of Chromosomal Instability by DNA Polymerase POLQ. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004654
The paper
Yousefzadeh, M. J., Wyatt, D. W., Takata, K.-I., Mu, Y., Hensley, S. C., Tomida, J., Bylund, G. O., Doublié, S., Johansson, E., Ramsden, D. A., McBride, K. M., & Wood, R. D. (2014). Mechanism of Suppression of Chromosomal Instability by DNA Polymerase POLQ. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004654

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.