Cited by 44Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

A Hox Transcription Factor Collective Binds a Highly Conserved Distal-less cis-Regulatory Module to Generate Robust Transcriptional Outcomes

Open access
Uhl, Juli D., Zandvakili, Arya, Gebelein, Brian·2016·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) generate precise expression patterns by integrating numerous transcription factors (TFs). Surprisingly, CRMs that control essential gene patterns can differ greatly in conservation, suggesting distinct constraints on TF binding sites. Here, we show that a highly conserved Distal-less regulatory element (DCRE) that controls gene expression in leg precursor cells recruits multiple Hox, Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) complexes to mediate dual outputs: thoracic activation and abdominal repression. Using reporter assays, we found that abdominal repression is particularly robust, as neither individual binding site mutations nor a DNA binding deficient Hth protein abolished cooperative DNA binding and in vivo repression. Moreover, a re-engineered DCRE containing a distinct configuration of Hox, Exd, and Hth sites also mediated abdominal Hox repression. However, the re-engineered DCRE failed to perform additional segment-specific functions such as thoracic activation. These findings are consistent with two emerging concepts in gene regulation: First, the abdominal Hox/Exd/Hth factors utilize protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions to form repression complexes on flexible combinations of sites, consistent with the TF collective model of CRM organization. Second, the conserved DCRE mediates multiple cell-type specific outputs, consistent with recent findings that pleiotropic CRMs are associated with conserved TF binding and added evolutionary constraints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005981

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dissection of an enhancer controlling the specification of Drosophila leg precursor cells showed that it was robust against motif disruption, but relied on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions between a particular set of transcription factors.

    “For example, dissection of an enhancer controlling the specification of Drosophila leg precursor cells showed that it was robust against motif disruption, but relied on DNA–protein and protein–protein interactions between a particular set of TFs [94].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. [1]Davidson EH (2001) Genomic Regulatory Systems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 261 p.
  2. [2]Levine M (2010) Transcriptional enhancers in animal development and evolution. Current biology: CB 20: R754– 763. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.070 20833320 PMC4280268 · DOI
  3. [3]Levine M, Davidson EH (2005) Gene regulatory networks for development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4936– 4942. 15788537 PMC555974
  4. [4]Levine M, Tjian R (2003) Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 424: 147– 151. 12853946
  5. [5]Spitz F, Furlong EE (2012) Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nature reviews Genetics 13: 613– 626. 10.1038/nrg3207 22868264 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Nord AS, Blow MJ, Attanasio C, Akiyama JA, Holt A, et al (2013) Rapid and pervasive changes in genome-wide enhancer usage during mammalian development. Cell 155: 1521– 1531. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.033 24360275 PMC3989111 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]May D, Blow MJ, Kaplan T, McCulley DJ, Jensen BC, et al (2012) Large-scale discovery of enhancers from human heart tissue. Nat Genet 44: 89– 93. PMC3246570 22138689
  8. [9]Visel A, Rubin EM, Pennacchio LA (2009) Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers. Nature 461: 199– 205. 10.1038/nature08451 19741700 PMC2923221 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, et al (2009) Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 9362– 9367. 10.1073/pnas.0903103106 19474294 PMC2687147 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [12]Weirauch MT, Yang A, Albu M, Cote AG, Montenegro-Montero A, et al (2014) Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity. Cell 158: 1431– 1443. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 25215497 PMC4163041 · DOI
  11. [14]Arnosti DN, Kulkarni MM (2005) Transcriptional enhancers: Intelligent enhanceosomes or flexible billboards? Journal of cellular biochemistry 94: 890– 898. 15696541
  12. [15]Panne D (2008) The enhanceosome. Current opinion in structural biology 18: 236– 242. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.12.002 18206362 · DOI
  13. [16]Thanos D, Maniatis T (1995) Virus induction of human IFN beta gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome. Cell 83: 1091– 1100. 8548797
  14. [17]Arnosti DN (2003) Analysis and function of transcriptional regulatory elements: insights from Drosophila. Annual review of entomology 48: 579– 602. 12359740
  15. [18]Ludwig MZ, Bergman C, Patel NH, Kreitman M (2000) Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature 403: 564– 567. 10676967
  16. [19]Ludwig MZ, Kreitman M (1995) Evolutionary dynamics of the enhancer region of even-skipped in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 12: 1002– 1011. 8524036
  17. [20]Ludwig MZ, Palsson A, Alekseeva E, Bergman CM, Nathan J, et al (2005) Functional evolution of a cis-regulatory module. PLoS Biol 3: e93 15757364 PMC1064851
  18. [21]Ludwig MZ, Patel NH, Kreitman M (1998) Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. Development 125: 949– 958. 9449677
  19. [23]Weirauch MT, Hughes TR (2010) Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Genet 26: 66– 74. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.002 20083321 · DOI
  20. [24]Hare EE, Peterson BK, Iyer VN, Meier R, Eisen MB (2008) Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation. PLoS genetics 4: e1000106 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000106 18584029 PMC2430619 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [25]Williams JA, Paddock SW, Vorwerk K, Carroll SB (1994) Organization of wing formation and induction of a wing-patterning gene at the dorsal/ventral compartment boundary. Nature 368: 299– 305. 8127364
  22. [26]Vachon G, Cohen B, Pfeifle C, McGuffin ME, Botas J, et al (1992) Homeotic genes of the Bithorax complex repress limb development in the abdomen of the Drosophila embryo through the target gene Distal-less. Cell 71: 437– 450. 1358457
  23. [27]Gebelein B, Culi J, Ryoo HD, Zhang W, Mann RS (2002) Specificity of Distalless repression and limb primordia development by abdominal Hox proteins. Dev Cell 3: 487– 498. 12408801
  24. [28]Gebelein B, McKay DJ, Mann RS (2004) Direct integration of Hox and segmentation gene inputs during Drosophila development. Nature 431: 653– 659. 15470419
  25. [29]Cadigan KM, Grossniklaus U, Gehring WJ (1994) Functional redundancy: the respective roles of the two sloppy paired genes in Drosophila segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 6324– 6328. 8022780 PMC44194
  26. [30]Rieckhof GE, Casares F, Ryoo HD, Abu-Shaar M, Mann RS (1997) Nuclear translocation of extradenticle requires homothorax, which encodes an extradenticle-related homeodomain protein. Cell 91: 171– 183. 9346235
  27. [31]Peifer M, Wieschaus E (1990) Mutations in the Drosophila gene extradenticle affect the way specific homeo domain proteins regulate segmental identity. Genes Dev 4: 1209– 1223. 1976570
  28. [32]Mann RS, Affolter M (1998) Hox proteins meet more partners. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8: 423– 429. 9729718
  29. [33]Cohen B, Simcox AA, Cohen SM (1993) Allocation of the thoracic imaginal primordia in the Drosophila embryo. Development 117: 597– 608. 8330530
  30. [34]Sambrani N, Hudry B, Maurel-Zaffran C, Zouaz A, Mishra R, et al (2013) Distinct molecular strategies for Hox-mediated limb suppression in Drosophila: from cooperativity to dispensability/antagonism in TALE partnership. PLoS Genet 9: e1003307 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003307 23505377 PMC3591290 · DOI
  31. [35]Bessa J, Gebelein B, Pichaud F, Casares F, Mann RS (2002) Combinatorial control of Drosophila eye development by eyeless, homothorax, and teashirt. Genes Dev 16: 2415– 2427. 12231630 PMC187435
  32. [36]Uv AE, Harrison EJ, Bray SJ (1997) Tissue-specific splicing and functions of the Drosophila transcription factor Grainyhead. Molecular and cellular biology 17: 6727– 6735. 9343437 PMC232527
  33. [37]Goto S, Hayashi S (1999) Proximal to distal cell communication in the Drosophila leg provides a basis for an intercalary mechanism of limb patterning. Development 126: 3407– 3413. 10393119
  34. [38]Cadigan KM, Grossniklaus U, Gehring WJ (1994) Localized expression of sloppy paired protein maintains the polarity of Drosophila parasegments. Genes Dev 8: 899– 913. 7926775
  35. [39]Grossniklaus U, Pearson RK, Gehring WJ (1992) The Drosophila sloppy paired locus encodes two proteins involved in segmentation that show homology to mammalian transcription factors. Genes Dev 6: 1030– 1051. 1317319
  36. [40]Kurant E, Pai CY, Sharf R, Halachmi N, Sun YH, et al (1998) Dorsotonals/homothorax, the Drosophila homologue of meis1, interacts with extradenticle in patterning of the embryonic PNS. Development 125: 1037– 1048. 9463350
  37. [41]Pai CY, Kuo TS, Jaw TJ, Kurant E, Chen CT, et al (1998) The Homothorax homeoprotein activates the nuclear localization of another homeoprotein, extradenticle, and suppresses eye development in Drosophila. Genes & development 12: 435– 446. 9450936 PMC316489
  38. [42]Gebelein B, Mann RS (2007) Compartmental modulation of abdominal Hox expression by engrailed and sloppy-paired patterns the fly ectoderm. Dev Biol. PMC2856935 17573068
  39. [43]Kurant E, Eytan D, Salzberg A (2001) Mutational analysis of the Drosophila homothorax gene. Genetics 157: 689– 698. 11156989 PMC1461517
  40. [44]Noro B, Culi J, McKay DJ, Zhang W, Mann RS (2006) Distinct functions of homeodomain-containing and homeodomain-less isoforms encoded by homothorax. Genes & development 20: 1636– 1650. 16778079 PMC1482483
  41. [45]Li-Kroeger D, Witt LM, Grimes HL, Cook TA, Gebelein B (2008) Hox and senseless antagonism functions as a molecular switch to regulate EGF secretion in the Drosophila PNS. Dev Cell 15: 298– 308. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.001 18694568 PMC2610489 · DOI
  42. [46]Li-Kroeger D, Cook T, Gebelein B (2012) Integration of an abdominal Hox complex with Pax2 yields cell-specific EGF secretion from Drosophila sensory precursor cells. Development In Press. PMC3317967 22438572
  43. [47]Noyes MB, Christensen RG, Wakabayashi A, Stormo GD, Brodsky MH, et al (2008) Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133: 1277– 1289. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.023 18585360 PMC2478728 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [48]Berger MF, Badis G, Gehrke AR, Talukder S, Philippakis AA, et al (2008) Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 133: 1266– 1276. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.024 18585359 PMC2531161 · DOI · Paper page
  45. [49]Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R (2009) Hox specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Curr Top Dev Biol 88: 63– 101. 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88003-4 19651302 PMC2810641 · DOI
  46. [50]Merabet S, Saadaoui M, Sambrani N, Hudry B, Pradel J, et al (2007) A unique Extradenticle recruitment mode in the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 16946– 16951. 17942685 PMC2040397
  47. [51]Slattery M, Riley T, Liu P, Abe N, Gomez-Alcala P, et al (2011) Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell 147: 1270– 1282. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.053 22153072 PMC3319069 · DOI
  48. [52]Joshi R, Passner JM, Rohs R, Jain R, Sosinsky A, et al (2007) Functional specificity of a Hox protein mediated by the recognition of minor groove structure. Cell 131: 530– 543. 17981120 PMC2709780
  49. [53]Joshi R, Sun L, Mann R (2010) Dissecting the functional specificities of two Hox proteins. Genes Dev 24: 1533– 1545. 10.1101/gad.1936910 20634319 PMC2904943 · DOI
  50. [55]Shen WF, Montgomery JC, Rozenfeld S, Moskow JJ, Lawrence HJ, et al (1997) AbdB-like Hox proteins stabilize DNA binding by the Meis1 homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6448– 6458. 9343407 PMC232497
  51. [56]Uhl JD, Cook TA, Gebelein B (2010) Comparing anterior and posterior Hox complex formation reveals guidelines for predicting cis-regulatory elements. Developmental biology 343: 154– 166. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.04.004 20398649 PMC2885469 · DOI
  52. [57]Ferretti E, Cambronero F, Tumpel S, Longobardi E, Wiedemann LM, et al (2005) Hoxb1 enhancer and control of rhombomere 4 expression: complex interplay between PREP1-PBX1-HOXB1 binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 25: 8541– 8552. 16166636 PMC1265741
  53. [58]Ferretti E, Marshall H, Popperl H, Maconochie M, Krumlauf R, et al (2000) Segmental expression of Hoxb2 in r4 requires two separate sites that integrate cooperative interactions between Prep1, Pbx and Hox proteins. Development 127: 155– 166. 10654609
  54. [59]Manzanares M, Bel-Vialar S, Ariza-McNaughton L, Ferretti E, Marshall H, et al (2001) Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain involve auto- and cross-regulatory mechanisms. Development 128: 3595– 3607. 11566863
  55. [60]Popperl H, Bienz M, Studer M, Chan SK, Aparicio S, et al (1995) Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx. Cell 81: 1031– 1042. 7600572
  56. [61]Tumpel S, Cambronero F, Ferretti E, Blasi F, Wiedemann LM, et al (2007) Expression of Hoxa2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by a conserved cross-regulatory mechanism dependent upon Hoxb1. Dev Biol 302: 646– 660. 17113575
  57. [62]Harmston N, Baresic A, Lenhard B (2013) The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368: 20130021 10.1098/rstb.2013.0021 24218634 PMC3826495 · DOI
  58. [63]Woolfe A, Goodson M, Goode DK, Snell P, McEwen GK, et al (2005) Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol 3: e7 15630479 PMC526512
  59. [64]Pennacchio LA, Ahituv N, Moses AM, Prabhakar S, Nobrega MA, et al (2006) In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444: 499– 502. 17086198
  60. [65]McEwen GK, Goode DK, Parker HJ, Woolfe A, Callaway H, et al (2009) Early evolution of conserved regulatory sequences associated with development in vertebrates. PLoS Genet 5: e1000762 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000762 20011110 PMC2781166 · DOI
  61. [66]Cheng Y, Ma Z, Kim BH, Wu W, Cayting P, et al (2014) Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human. Nature 515: 371– 375. 10.1038/nature13985 25409826 PMC4343047 · DOI
  62. [67]Uv AE, Harrison EJ, Bray SJ (1997) Tissue-specific splicing and functions of the Drosophila transcription factor Grainyhead. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6727– 6735. 9343437 PMC232527
  63. [68]Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312– 3317. 17360644 PMC1805588
  64. [69]Abu-Shaar M, Ryoo HD, Mann RS (1999) Control of the nuclear localization of Extradenticle by competing nuclear import and export signals. Genes Dev 13: 935– 945. 10215621 PMC316638
  65. [70]Ryoo HD, Mann RS (1999) The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle. Genes Dev 13: 1704– 1716. 10398683 PMC316852
  66. [71]Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, et al (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12: 996– 1006. 12045153 PMC186604

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhl, J. D., Zandvakili, A., & Gebelein, B.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gebelein, Brian
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2016-04-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e1005981
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2327770660
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM079428, GM079428)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
Hox transcription factors, cis-regulatory modules, Extradenticle, homothorax, transcriptional repression, cooperative DNA binding, protein-protein interaction, Drosophila
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Protein Binding, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Conserved Sequence, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins, Regulatory Elements, Transcriptional, Antennapedia Homeodomain Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review