Comparative whole-genome analyses of articular chondrocytes and skin fibroblasts reveal distinct genome instability landscapes in mesenchymal cell types
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
DNA damage lesions can result in mutations and genome rearrangements that are associated with cellular aging and diseases. The landscape of somatic mutations in individual tissue and cell types are dictated by their unique physiological states, cellular functions, mutagenic exposures, and efficiency of DNA repair. Articular chondrocytes and skin fibroblasts are two cell types of mesodermal origin with distinct exposure to internal and external sources of DNA damage. While somatic genome instability features of skin fibroblasts have been well detailed, knowledge about mechanisms underlying genome changes in chondrocytes is scarce. Here, we took a whole-genome sequencing approach to evaluate the load, sources, and patterns of genome changes in 18 primary human chondrocyte clones from donors with and without osteoarthritis (OA). Findings in chondrocyte clones largely agreed with a recent study of 100 single-cell sequenced chondrocytes. We compared genome changes in chondrocytes with clonally-expanded human skin fibroblasts sequenced in our previous studies. We demonstrated that skin fibroblasts show a higher burden of somatic mutations, with an increased rate of mutation accumulation per cell division. Motif-centered analyses of mutation catalogues identified only endogenous sources of mutations in chondrocytes, as opposed to skin fibroblasts which also showed a heavy burden of UV-induced mutations. Spontaneous deamination of meCpG and mutagenesis by exposure to small epoxides and S N 2 electrophiles showed higher mutagenic activities in chondrocytes compared to skin fibroblasts. Chondrocytes showed ubiquitous prevalence of indels in homonucleotide runs of ≥5 bases, while skin fibroblasts showed high contributions of UV-associated deletions of ≥5 bp not in repeats. Structural variants in rearrangement hotspots colocalized with human common fragile sites in skin fibroblasts, but not in chondrocytes. Together, our study comprehensively recorded genome instability features in chondrocytes and highlighted the unique mutagenesis landscapes of two mesenchymal cell types.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Extracellular Matrix and Dermal Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound
Tracy, L. E., Minasian, R. A., & Caterson, E. J. (2016) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0561 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life
Blokzijl, F., de Ligt, J., Jager, M., Sasselli, V., Roerink, S., Sasaki, N., Huch, M., Boymans, S., Kuijk, E., Prins, P., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19768 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process
Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Mutagenicity and repair of oxidative DNA damage: insights from studies using defined lesions
Wang, D., Kreutzer, D. A., & Essigmann, J. M. (1998) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00066-9 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
You, Y.-H., Lee, D.-H., Yoon, J.-H., Nakajima, S., Yasui, A., & Pfeifer, G. P. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m107696200 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Separate domains of Rev1 mediate two modes of DNA damage bypass in mammalian cells
Jansen, J. G., Tsaalbi-Shtylik, A., Hendriks, G., Gali, H., Hendel, A., Johansson, F., Erixon, K., Livneh, Z., Mullenders, L. H. F., Haracska, L., et al. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00071-09 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
The Impact of Environmental and Endogenous Damage on Somatic Mutation Load in Human Skin Fibroblasts
Saini, N., Roberts, S. A., Klimczak, L. J., Chan, K., Grimm, S. A., Dai, S., Fargo, D. C., Boyer, J. C., Kaufmann, W. K., Taylor, J. A., et al. (2016) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006385 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationRen, P., Zheng, C., Pang, Y., Qiang, Y., Sun, S., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Lee, M., Lu, Z., Zhou, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-025-01011-z · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Sauty, S. M., Shine, J., Bostan, H., Li, J.-L., Mieczkowski, P. A., Loeser, R. F., Diekman, B. O., & Gordenin, D. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Diekman, Brian O.
- Gordenin, Dmitry A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLOS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2026-05-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e1012156
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC12918860
- OpenAlex
- W7161770165
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2026-05-26)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (vor)
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program (Z1AES103266)
- National Institutes of Health (R01AG081734)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (RO1AG044034)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- articular chondrocytes, dermal fibroblasts, somatic mutations, genomic instability, osteoarthritis, DNA damage, UV-induced mutations, 5-methylcytosine, indels, structural variants, common fragile sites, mutational signatures, DNA repair, mesenchymal cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review