Cited by 446Data Quality and ManagementAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data Cleaning: Detecting, Diagnosing, and Editing Data Abnormalities

Open access
Van den Broeck, Jan, Argeseanu Cunningham, Solveig, Eeckels, Roger, Herbst, Kobus·2005·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

Inlier: Data value falling within

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020267

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A Data-Cleaning Framework (Illustration: Giovanni Maki)
Figure 1 A Data-Cleaning Framework (Illustration: Giovanni Maki)CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Areas within the Range of a Continuous Variable Defined by Hard and Soft Cutoffs for Error Screening and Diagnosis, with Recommended Diagnostic Steps for Data Points Falling in Each Area (Illustration: Giovanni Maki)
Figure 2 Areas within the Range of a Continuous Variable Defined by Hard and Soft Cutoffs for Error Screening and Diagnosis, with Recommended Diagnostic Steps for Data Points Falling in Each Area (Illustration: Giovanni Maki)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gonzalez, 1975, J Am Stat Assoc, 70, 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 446

Metadata

Authors
Van den Broeck, J., Argeseanu Cunningham, S., Eeckels, R., & Herbst, K.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2005-09-06
Volume
2
Issue
10
Pages
e267
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W1971935224
Cited by
446
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (063009)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
data cleaning, data quality, data anomalies, outlier detection, data editing, data validation
MeSH terms
Ethics, Professional, Humans, Peer Review, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Epidemiologic Studies, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review