Cited by 876Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsDelphi Technique in Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)

Open access

Abstract

Simon Lewin and colleagues present a methodology for increasing transparency and confidence in qualitative research synthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 876

Metadata

Authors
Lewin, S., Glenton, C., Munthe-Kaas, H., Carlsen, B., Colvin, C. J., Gülmezoglu, M., Noyes, J., Booth, A., Garside, R., & Rashidian, A.
Affiliations
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
  • Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • World Bank (US)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (EG)
Corresponding author
Lewin, Simon
Venue
PLOS Medicine
Published
2015-10-27
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
e1001895
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2107819237
Cited by
866
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 68 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 2
FWCI
63.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA) (University of Bergen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bangor University Research Portal (Bangor University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
qualitative evidence synthesis, GRADE-CERQual, decision-making, transparency, research evidence appraisal
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Public Policy, Research Design, Qualitative Research, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review