Cited by 53Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsArt Therapy and Mental Health

“We need them as much as they need us”: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence for possible mechanisms of effectiveness of animal-assisted intervention (AAI)

Shen, Ruth Z.Z., Xiong, Peng, Chou, Un I., Hall, Brian J.·2018·Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Abstract

Objective Although Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) are effective treatments for a variety of psychological problems, the mechanism of treatment effectiveness remains unclear. Qualitative studies of AAI may reveal possible mechanisms. This review aims to synthesize qualitative research and identify factors that might contribute to the effectiveness of AAI.Methods A literature search of qualitative evidence published before August 8 th, 2018 was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, ERIC, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, and HABRI, with the aim of identifying qualitative research conducted with individuals undergoing AAI. Quality assessment was undertaken by CASP and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using CERQual.Results A total of 1866 articles were reviewed, and seven were included in the final analysis. A total of six themes were identified as factors relating to the effectiveness of AAI: 1. Fostering feelings of normalcy, 2. Improving behavioral activation, 3. Self-esteem enhancement, 4. Physical contact, belonging, and companionship, 5. Calming and comforting, and 6. Distraction. Barriers to AAI effectiveness were also identified.Conclusion The results of these studies suggest that AAI was viewed as a positive and highly accepted intervention across populations and settings. AAI might be a useful intervention among people who suffer from a variety of mental disorders. All themes consistently demonstrated that contact with a live animal is more important than the appearance of the animal. Additional investigations of AAI treatment mechanisms are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical contact has been identified as one of the main mechanisms to achieve relevant benefits from AAT, such as stress reduction or the feeling of being connected and not alone.

    “Furthermore, physical contact has been identified as one of the main mechanisms to achieve relevant benefits from AAT, such as stress reduction or the feeling of being connected and not alone [38].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, R. Z. Z., Xiong, P., Chou, U. I., & Hall, B. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Brian J.
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
41
Pages
203-207
ISSN
0965-2299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895133194
Cited by
53
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidade de Macau
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
animal-assisted interventions, human-animal interaction, mental illness, behavioral activation, self-esteem, physical contact, sense of belonging, sedative effects, distraction
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Humans, Qualitative Research, Animal Assisted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review