The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology—Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the STROBE statement into Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Recommendations for the reporting of nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research were developed following a systematic and consultative process, coordinated by a multidisciplinary group of 21 experts. Consensus on reporting guidelines was reached through a three-round Delphi consultation process with 53 external experts. In total, 24 recommendations for nutritional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist. CONCLUSION: When used appropriately, reporting guidelines for nutritional epidemiology can contribute to improve reporting of observational studies with a focus on diet and health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“STROBE-nut and STROBE-ME reporting guidelines were respected (Gallo et al. 2011; Lachat et al. 2016).”
From Vitamin D status and its determinants in German elite athletes (2025) · cites this paper as Lachat et al. 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vandenbroucke, J. P., von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 · Cited by 8,613 · cited 1×
“The need to ensure clear, transparent, and useful reports in health research led to important reporting initiatives such as the Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [8].”
BackgroundSelf-citationGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · Cited by 1,437 · cited 1×
“The STROBE-nut checklist and recommendations were developed following recommended procedures [11].”
MethodChowdhury, R., Warnakula, S., Kunutsor, S., Crowe, F., Ward, H. A., Johnson, L., Franco, O. H., Butterworth, A. S., Forouhi, N. G., Thompson, S. G., et al. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m13-1788 · Cited by 1,139
Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393 · Cited by 891
Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors
Simera, I., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Hoey, J. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050139 · Cited by 220 · cited 1×
“The final sample of experts that provided input, however, was adequate and still higher than most reporting guidelines that used face-to-face meetings or workshops [31].”
Result
Cited by
Dietary Assessment Toolkits: An Overview
Dao, M. C., Subar, A. F., Warthon-Medina, M., Cade, J. E., Burrows, T., Golley, R. K., Forouhi, N. G., Pearce, M., & Holmes, B. A. (2019) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980018002951 · Cited by 176
Self-citationPestoni, G., Krieger, J.-P., Sych, J. M., Faeh, D., & Rohrmann, S. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11010126 · Cited by 73
Amaral, M. A., Mundstock, E., Scarpatto, C. H., Cañon-Montañez, W., & Mattiello, R. (2022) · Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100078 · Cited by 14
Vitamin D status and its determinants in German elite athletes
Hacker, S., Lenz, C., Reichert, L., Ringseis, R., Zentgraf, K., & Krüger, K. (2025) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-024-05699-6 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachat, C., Hawwash, D., Ocké, M. C., Berg, C., Forsum, E., Hörnell, A., Larsson, C., Sonestedt, E., Wirfält, E., Åkesson, A., Kolsteren, P., Byrnes, G., De Keyzer, W., Van Camp, J., Cade, J. E., Slimani, N., Cevallos, M., Egger, M., & Huybrechts, I.
- Venue
- PLOS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-06-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1002036
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W4293254419
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
