Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance in Plague: An Emerging Public Health Risk

Open access
Welch, Timothy J., Fricke, W. Florian, McDermott, Patrick F., White, David G., Rosso, Marie-Laure, Rasko, David A., Mammel, Mark K., Eppinger, Mark, Rosovitz, M.J., Wagner, David, Rahalison, Lila, LeClerc, J. Eugene, Hinshaw, Jeffrey M., Lindler, Luther E., Cebula, Thomas A., Carniel, Elisabeth, Ravel, Jacques·2007·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance in Yersinia pestis is rare, yet constitutes a significant international public health and biodefense threat. In 1995, the first multidrug resistant (MDR) isolate of Y. pestis (strain IP275) was identified, and was shown to contain a self-transmissible plasmid (pIP1202) that conferred resistance to many of the antimicrobials recommended for plague treatment and prophylaxis. Comparative analysis of the DNA sequence of Y. pestis plasmid pIP1202 revealed a near identical IncA/C plasmid backbone that is shared by MDR plasmids isolated from Salmonella enterica serotype Newport SL254 and the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri YR71. The high degree of sequence identity and gene synteny between the plasmid backbones suggests recent acquisition of these plasmids from a common ancestor. In addition, the Y. pestis pIP1202-like plasmid backbone was detected in numerous MDR enterobacterial pathogens isolated from retail meat samples collected between 2002 and 2005 in the United States. Plasmid-positive strains were isolated from beef, chicken, turkey and pork, and were found in samples from the following states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York and Oregon. Our studies reveal that this common plasmid backbone is broadly disseminated among MDR zoonotic pathogens associated with agriculture. This reservoir of mobile resistance determinants has the potential to disseminate to Y. pestis and other human and zoonotic bacterial pathogens and therefore represents a significant public health concern.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0000309

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Welch, T. J., Fricke, W. F., McDermott, P. F., White, D. G., Rosso, M.-L., Rasko, D. A., Mammel, M. K., Eppinger, M., Rosovitz, M. J., Wagner, D., Rahalison, L., LeClerc, J. E., Hinshaw, J. M., Lindler, L. E., Cebula, T. A., Carniel, E., & Ravel, J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2007-03-21
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
e309
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978346502
Cited by
399
References
0
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance in Plague: An Emerging Public Health Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0000309
The paper
Welch, T. J., Fricke, W. F., McDermott, P. F., White, D. G., Rosso, M.-L., Rasko, D. A., Mammel, M. K., Eppinger, M., Rosovitz, M. J., Wagner, D., Rahalison, L., LeClerc, J. E., Hinshaw, J. M., Lindler, L. E., Cebula, T. A., Carniel, E., & Ravel, J. (2007). Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance in Plague: An Emerging Public Health Risk. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.