Cited by 157Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchMicro and Nano Robotics

Enhanced Caenorhabditis elegans Locomotion in a Structured Microfluidic Environment

Open access
Park, Sungsu, Hwang, Hyejin, Nam, Seong-Won, Martinez, Fernando, Austin, Robert H., Ryu, William S.·2008·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioral studies of Caenorhabditis elegans traditionally are done on the smooth surface of agar plates, but the natural habitat of C. elegans and other nematodes is the soil, a complex and structured environment. In order to investigate how worms move in such environments, we have developed a technique to study C. elegans locomotion in microstructures fabricated from agar. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: When placed in open, liquid-filled, microfluidic chambers containing a square array of posts, we discovered that worms are capable of a novel mode of locomotion, which combines the fast gait of swimming with the more efficient movements of crawling. When the wavelength of the worms matched the periodicity of the post array, the microstructure directed the swimming and increased the speed of C. elegans ten-fold. We found that mutants defective in mechanosensation (mec-4, mec-10) or mutants with abnormal waveforms (unc-29) did not perform this enhanced locomotion and moved much more slowly than wild-type worms in the microstructure. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that the microstructure can be used as a behavioral screen for mechanosensory and uncoordinated mutants. It is likely that worms use mechanosensation in the movement and navigation through heterogeneous environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0002550

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Arrays of microfluidic posts, called artificial dirt, have recently been developed specifically for studying locomotion in complex environments.

    “In particular, arrays of microfluidic posts (“artificial dirt”) have recently been developed specifically for this purpose (Lockery et al., 2008; Park et al., 2008).”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2008

  • The model copes well with artificial dirt environments, producing remarkably realistic locomotion when compared to reported behavior.

    “We find that the model copes well with these environments, producing remarkably realistic locomotion when compared to the reported behavior (Lockery et al., 2008; Park et al., 2008).”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2008

  • The model yields crawling behavior in the hexagonal post configuration and swimming-like motion in the cubic configuration.

    “Specifically, as in the experiments, the model yields crawling behavior in the hexagonal post configuration (Movies S3–S5 in Supplementary Material; Lockery et al., 2008) and swimming like motion in the cubic configuration (Movie S6 in Supplementary Material; Park et al., 2008).”

    From Gait Modulation in C. elegans: An Integrated Neuromechanical Model (2012) · cites this paper as Park et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S., Hwang, H., Nam, S.-W., Martinez, F., Austin, R. H., & Ryu, W. S.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Ryu, William S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2008-06-25
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
e2550
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980172171
Cited by
157
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, locomotion, swimming, crawling, mechanosensing, mec-4, mec-10, soil environment
MeSH terms
Animals, Locomotion, Caenorhabditis elegans, Microfluidics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review