Superposition of Transcriptional Behaviors Determines Gene State
Open accessAbstract
We introduce a novel technique to determine the expression state of a gene from quantitative information measuring its expression. Adopting a productive abstraction from current thinking in molecular biology, we consider two expression states for a gene--Up or Down. We determine this state by using a statistical model that assumes the data behaves as a combination of two biological distributions. Given a cohort of hybridizations, our algorithm predicts, for the single reading, the probability of each gene's being in an Up or a Down state in each hybridization. Using a series of publicly available gene expression data sets, we demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms the prevalent algorithm. We also show that our algorithm can be used in conjunction with expression adjustment techniques to produce a more biologically sound gene-state call. The technique we present here enables a routine update, where the continuously evolving expression level adjustments feed into gene-state calculations. The technique can be applied in almost any multi-sample gene expression experiment, and holds equal promise for protein abundance experiments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of recent papers have used pathway analysis workflow to highlight genes and pathways active in specific model organisms or diseased tissues.
“A number of recent papers have used this pathway analysis workflow to highlight genes and pathways that are active in specific model organisms or diseased tissues, such as breast cancer, using gene and protein expression, copy number variants (CNVs) and SNPs19,44-49.”
From The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing (2010) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Seel, N. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,525 · see citing works
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288 · see citing works
Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data
Irizarry, R. A. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gng015 · Cited by 4,906 · see citing works
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics.
Aa, Hogg, R. V., & Craig, A. T. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291439 · Cited by 2,914 · see citing works
Barker, L. E. (2002) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2002.s659 · Cited by 2,482 · see citing works
Miller, L. D., Smeds, J., George, J., Vega, V. B., Vergara, L. A., Ploner, A., Yudi Pawitan, Y., Hall, P. N., Klaar, S., Liu, E. T., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506230102 · Cited by 1,269 · see citing works
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics.
Doksum, K. A., Hogg, R. W., & Craig, A. T. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283566 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms
Liu, W.-M., Mei, R., Di, X., Ryder, T. B., Hubbell, E. A., Dee, S., Webster, T. A., Harrington, C. A., Ho, M.-H., Baid, J., et al. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1593 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms
Larkin, J. E., Frank, B. C., Gavras, H. P., Sultana, R., & Quackenbush, J. F. (2005) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth757 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Preferred analysis methods for Affymetrix GeneChips revealed by a wholly defined control dataset
Choe, S. E., Boutros, M., Michelson, A. M., Church, G. M., & Halfon, M. S. (2005) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r16 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Cellular abstractions: Cells as computation
Regev, A., & Shapiro, E. Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/419343a · Cited by 307 · see citing works
A Gamma mixture model better accounts for among site rate heterogeneity
Mayrose, I., Friedman, N., & Pupko, T. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1125 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Mixture Modeling for Genome‐Wide Localization of Transcription Factors
Keleş, S. (2006) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00659.x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Regev, A., & Shapiro, E. Y. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36481-1_1 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Normalization for Affymetrix GeneChips
Neuhäuser, M., & Boes, T. (2005) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1633986 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Maternity Length of Stay Modelling by Gamma Mixture Regression with Random Effects
Lee, A. H., Wang, K., Yau, K. K. W., et al. (2007) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.200610371 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing
Demir, E., Cary, M. P., Paley, S., Fukuda, K., Lemer, C., Vastrik, I., Wu, G., D'Eustachio, P., Schaefer, C., Luciano, J., et al. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1666 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Efroni, S., Carmel, L., Schaefer, C. G., & Buetow, K. H.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Buetow, Kenneth H.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-08-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e2901
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2488367
- OpenAlex
- W2123724449
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- gene expression classification, mixture models, two-state model, microarray hybridization, protein abundance
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Breast Neoplasms, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Genes, Humans, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Probability, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review