Cited by 13Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Superposition of Transcriptional Behaviors Determines Gene State

Open access
Efroni, Sol, Carmel, Liran, Schaefer, Carl G., Buetow, Kenneth H.·2008·PLoS ONE

Abstract

We introduce a novel technique to determine the expression state of a gene from quantitative information measuring its expression. Adopting a productive abstraction from current thinking in molecular biology, we consider two expression states for a gene--Up or Down. We determine this state by using a statistical model that assumes the data behaves as a combination of two biological distributions. Given a cohort of hybridizations, our algorithm predicts, for the single reading, the probability of each gene's being in an Up or a Down state in each hybridization. Using a series of publicly available gene expression data sets, we demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms the prevalent algorithm. We also show that our algorithm can be used in conjunction with expression adjustment techniques to produce a more biologically sound gene-state call. The technique we present here enables a routine update, where the continuously evolving expression level adjustments feed into gene-state calculations. The technique can be applied in almost any multi-sample gene expression experiment, and holds equal promise for protein abundance experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0002901

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of recent papers have used pathway analysis workflow to highlight genes and pathways active in specific model organisms or diseased tissues.

    “A number of recent papers have used this pathway analysis workflow to highlight genes and pathways that are active in specific model organisms or diseased tissues, such as breast cancer, using gene and protein expression, copy number variants (CNVs) and SNPs19,44-49.”

    From The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing (2010) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Efroni, S., Carmel, L., Schaefer, C. G., & Buetow, K. H.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Buetow, Kenneth H.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2008-08-06
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
e2901
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123724449
Cited by
13
References
16
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
gene expression classification, mixture models, two-state model, microarray hybridization, protein abundance
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Breast Neoplasms, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Genes, Humans, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Probability, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review