The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies
Open accessAbstract
The dramatic increase in heterogeneous types of biological data--in particular, the abundance of new protein sequences--requires fast and user-friendly methods for organizing this information in a way that enables functional inference. The most widely used strategy to link sequence or structure to function, homology-based function prediction, relies on the fundamental assumption that sequence or structural similarity implies functional similarity. New tools that extend this approach are still urgently needed to associate sequence data with biological information in ways that accommodate the real complexity of the problem, while being accessible to experimental as well as computational biologists. To address this, we have examined the application of sequence similarity networks for visualizing functional trends across protein superfamilies from the context of sequence similarity. Using three large groups of homologous proteins of varying types of structural and functional diversity--GPCRs and kinases from humans, and the crotonase superfamily of enzymes--we show that overlaying networks with orthogonal information is a powerful approach for observing functional themes and revealing outliers. In comparison to other primary methods, networks provide both a good representation of group-wise sequence similarity relationships and a strong visual and quantitative correlation with phylogenetic trees, while enabling analysis and visualization of much larger sets of sequences than trees or multiple sequence alignments can easily accommodate. We also define important limitations and caveats in the application of these networks. As a broadly accessible and effective tool for the exploration of protein superfamilies, sequence similarity networks show great potential for generating testable hypotheses about protein structure-function relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor
Palczewski, K., Kumasaka, T., Hori, T., Behnke, C. A., Motoshima, H., Fox, B. A., Trong, I. L., Teller, D. C., Okada, T., Stenkamp, R. E., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.739 · Cited by 5,637
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
structureViz: linking cytoscape and UCSF Chimera
Morris, J. H., Huang, C. C., Babbitt, P. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm329 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Cited by
Panoramic view of a superfamily of phosphatases through substrate profiling
Huang, H., Pandya, C., Liu, C., Al-Obaidi, N. F., Wang, M., Zheng, L., Toews Keating, S., Aono, M., Love, J. D., Evans, B., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1423570112 · Cited by 168
Comparative and Functional Algal Genomics
Blaby-Haas, C. E., & Merchant, S. S. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095841 · Cited by 131
Mayfield, J. A., Hammer, N. D., Kurker, R. C., Chen, T. K., Ojha, S., Skaar, E. P., & DuBois, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.442335 · Cited by 63
“The resulting 5923 sequences were used to generate sequence similarity networks using previously published methods (31) and visualized using the Cytoscape program.”
MethodLiu, D., Wei, Y., Liu, X., Zhou, Y., Jiang, L., Yin, J., Wang, F., Hu, Y., Nanjaraj Urs, A. N., Liu, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06627-x · Cited by 63
Himmel, N. J., Moi, D., & Benton, R. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.008 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, H. J., Morris, J. H., Ferrin, T. E., & Babbitt, P. C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-02-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e4345
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113561798
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0004345
- The paper
- Atkinson, H. J., Morris, J. H., Ferrin, T. E., & Babbitt, P. C. (2009). Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.