The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Golden Gate Shuffling: A One-Pot DNA Shuffling Method Based on Type IIs Restriction Enzymes
Open accessAbstract
We have developed a protocol to assemble in one step and one tube at least nine separate DNA fragments together into an acceptor vector, with 90% of recombinant clones obtained containing the desired construct. This protocol is based on the use of type IIs restriction enzymes and is performed by simply subjecting a mix of 10 undigested input plasmids (nine insert plasmids and the acceptor vector) to a restriction-ligation and transforming the resulting mix in competent cells. The efficiency of this protocol allows generating libraries of recombinant genes by combining in one reaction several fragment sets prepared from different parental templates. As an example, we have applied this strategy for shuffling of trypsinogen from three parental templates (bovine cationic trypsinogen, bovine anionic trypsinogen and human cationic trypsinogen) each divided in 9 separate modules. We show that one round of shuffling using the 27 trypsinogen entry plasmids can easily produce the 19,683 different possible combinations in one single restriction-ligation and that expression screening of a subset of the library allows identification of variants that can lead to higher expression levels of trypsin activity. This protocol, that we call 'Golden Gate shuffling', is robust, simple and efficient, can be performed with templates that have no homology, and can be combined with other shuffling protocols in order to introduce any variation in any part of a given gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA
Nishimasu, H., Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Konermann, S., Shehata, S. I., Dohmae, N., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., & Nureki, O. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.001 · Cited by 2,306
A Modular Cloning System for Standardized Assembly of Multigene Constructs
Weber, E., Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Werner, S., & Marillonnet, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016765 · Cited by 1,377
Self-citationTAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting
Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204094 · Cited by 984
A Highly Characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multipart Assembly
Lee, M. E., DeLoache, W. C., Cervantes, B., & Dueber, J. E. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb500366v · Cited by 916
High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells
Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., Cai, C., Yuan, P., Li, C., Huang, Y., & Wei, W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13166 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Kandzia, R., & Marillonnet, S.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-05-14
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e5553
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160253662
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Golden Gate Shuffling: A One-Pot DNA Shuffling Method Based on Type IIs Restriction Enzymes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0005553
- The paper
- Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Kandzia, R., & Marillonnet, S. (2009). Golden Gate Shuffling: A One-Pot DNA Shuffling Method Based on Type IIs Restriction Enzymes. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.