Cited by 58Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

Chemical Analysis and Risk Assessment of Diethyl Phthalate in Alcoholic Beverages with Special Regard to Unrecorded Alcohol

Open access
Leitz, Jenny, Kuballa, Thomas, Rehm, Jürgen, Lachenmeier, Dirk W.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phthalates are synthetic compounds with a widespread field of applications. For example, they are used as plasticizers in PVC plastics and food packaging, or are added to personal care products. Diethyl phthalate (DEP) may be used to denature alcohol, e.g., for cosmetic purposes. Public health concerns of phthalates include carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic and endocrine effects. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a method for determining phthalates in alcohol samples and to provide a risk assessment for consumers of such products. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A liquid-liquid extraction procedure was optimized by varying the following parameters: type of extraction solvent (cyclohexane, n-hexane, 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane), the ratio extraction solvent/sample volume (1 ratio 1 to 50 ratio 1) and the number of extraction repetitions (1-10). The best extraction yield (99.9%) was achieved with the solvent 1,1,2-trichlorotrifluoroethane, an extraction solvent volume/sample volume ratio of 10 ratio 1 and a double extraction. For quantification, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with deuterated internal standards was used. The investigated samples were alcoholic beverages and unrecorded alcohol products from different countries (n = 257). Two unrecorded alcohol samples from Lithuania contained diethyl phthalate in concentrations of 608 mg/L and 210 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The consumption of the phthalate-positive unrecorded alcohols would exceed tolerable daily intakes as derived from animal experiments. Both positive samples were labelled as cosmetic alcohol, but had clearly been offered for human consumption. DEP seems to be unsuitable as a denaturing agent as it has no effect on the organoleptic properties of ethanol. In light of our results that DEP might be consumed by humans in unrecorded alcohols, the prohibition of its use as a denaturing agent should be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0008127

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While there have been some instances where ingredients of unrecorded alcohol have been found which could cause liver problems over and above the impact of ethanol, these instances are limited.

    “While there have been some instances where ingredients of unrecorded alcohol have been found which could cause liver problems over and above the impact of ethanol 288, 289 these instances are limited, and the overall conclusion of relevant reviews has been that there is not sufficient evidence to link a sizable portion of liver cirrhosis mortality to unrecorded alcohol (290, 291; see also 292).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]Schwetlick K 2001 Organikum. 21st Ed. Chapter D 2.6.3, p. 241. Wiley-VCH Verlag Weinheim, Germany
  2. [37]Andersen FA 2005 Annual Review of Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Assessments-2002/2003: Dibutyl Phthalate, Diethyl Phthalate and Dimethyl Phthalate. Int J Toxicol 24 43 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leitz, J., Kuballa, T., Rehm, J., & Lachenmeier, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Karlsruhe (DE)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Lachenmeier, Dirk W.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-12-02
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
e8127
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085197293
Cited by
58
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Commission (223059)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
diethyl phthalate, phthalates, alcoholic beverages, unrecorded alcohol, denatured alcohol, liquid-liquid extraction, extraction method validation, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, risk assessment, tolerable daily intake, endocrine disruptors, plasticizers, consumer exposure
MeSH terms
Alcoholic Beverages, Chemistry Techniques, Analytical, Humans, Lithuania, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Phthalic Acids, Reference Standards, Solvents, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review