Cited by 68Paleopathology and ancient diseasesForensic and Genetic ResearchForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Molecular Exploration of the First-Century Tomb of the Shroud in Akeldama, Jerusalem

Open access
Matheson, Carney D., Vernon, Kim K., Lahti, Arlene, Fratpietro, Renee, Spigelman, Mark, Gibson, Shimon, Greenblatt, Charles L., Donoghue, Helen D.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The Tomb of the Shroud is a first-century C.E. tomb discovered in Akeldama, Jerusalem, Israel that had been illegally entered and looted. The investigation of this tomb by an interdisciplinary team of researchers began in 2000. More than twenty stone ossuaries for collecting human bones were found, along with textiles from a burial shroud, hair and skeletal remains. The research presented here focuses on genetic analysis of the bioarchaeological remains from the tomb using mitochondrial DNA to examine familial relationships of the individuals within the tomb and molecular screening for the presence of disease. There are three mitochondrial haplotypes shared between a number of the remains analyzed suggesting a possible family tomb. There were two pathogens genetically detected within the collection of osteological samples, these were Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae. The Tomb of the Shroud is one of very few examples of a preserved shrouded human burial and the only example of a plaster sealed loculus with remains genetically confirmed to have belonged to a shrouded male individual that suffered from tuberculosis and leprosy dating to the first-century C.E. This is the earliest case of leprosy with a confirmed date in which M. leprae DNA was detected.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Ancient DNA analysis of the first-century C.E. Tomb of the Shroud in Akeldama, Jerusalem tested 23 bioarchaeological samples plus 3 environmental controls for mitochondrial DNA relatedness and mycobacterial disease. The study identified shared mtDNA haplotypes suggesting a family tomb and detected *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* and *Mycobacterium leprae*, including the earliest confirmed-date case of *M. leprae* DNA.

Key findings

  • Of 23 samples tested for genetic relatedness or disease, mtDNA analysis found two mtDNA profiles shared between two individuals and one mtDNA profile shared between three individuals, suggesting maternal relationships within the tomb.
  • *M. tuberculosis* DNA was detected in the SC1 shroud loculus individual and in two infants from SC2; *M. leprae* DNA was detected exclusively in the SC1 shroud loculus individual, indicating co-infection in that adult male.
  • The shroud textile radiocarbon date was 2025 ± 28 years BP, with calibrated ranges of 50 BCE–16 CE at one sigma and 95 BCE–53 CE at two sigma; the paper states this is the earliest case of leprosy with a confirmed date in which *M. leprae* DNA was detected.
  • Sex identification found SC1 as adult male, SC2 as adult female plus two infants of indeterminate sex, SC4 as two male samples likely from the same individual, SC7 as one male and one female with different mtDNA types, SC9 as adult male, and SC17 as one adult female and one sex-indeterminate individual.

Methods

  • The study used standard ancient DNA protocols at the Hebrew University Kuvin Centre, with replication at the Paleo-DNA Laboratory, Lakehead University, and the Department of Infection, University College London.
  • Samples included teeth, bone, textile, and hair from the tomb, plus sediment controls; PCR and sequencing targeted mtDNA hypervariable regions 1 and 2, amelogenin and X/Y alphoid repeats for sex, *M. tuberculosis* IS6110 and S12, and *M. leprae* RLEP and 18 kDa antigen.
  • Morphological analysis was limited by disturbed remains and recovery of less than 5% of each skeleton; one phalanx had secondary osseous remodeling lesions not pathognomonic for any disease, so all samples were screened for *M. tuberculosis* and *M. leprae*.

Limitations

  • The paper states the tomb had been illegally entered and looted, remains were extremely disturbed and damaged, less than 5% of each skeleton was recovered, and traditional morphological analysis did not yield information on MNI, height, age, sex, ancestry, or pathology.
  • The paper notes the mtDNA target region is small and errors could be introduced in identifying relationships among a random sample population; one SC7 sample did not produce a reliable mtDNA sequence and its provenance could not be resolved.
  • Evident from the text: relatedness inferences rely on maternal mtDNA only, paternal relationships were not tested, and the authors state future Y chromosome analyses are needed; the small number of individuals and degraded ancient DNA also constrain interpretation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0008319

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    The identification of M. tuberculosis from an individual approximately 2,000 years ago is consistent with our current understanding of Mycobacterium infection and transmission between humans and in humans and domesticated animals.

    “The identification of M. tuberculosis from an individual approximately 2,000 years ago is consistent with our current understanding of Mycobacterium infection and transmission between humans and in humans and domesticated animals [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Hershkovitz I Donoghue HD Minnikin DE Besra GS Lee OY 2008 Detection and molecular characterization of 9,000-year-old Mycobacterium tuberculosis from a Neolithic settlement in the Eastern Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 3 e3426 18923677 PMC2565837 source

      The Introduction reports M. tuberculosis in human remains, and the Discussion links its transmission to denser human populations. But the studied remains date to 9,250–8,160 years ago, not approximately 2,000 years ago. The paper also says domesticated animals were not the source of infection in this population; it does not establish transmission between humans and domesticated animals. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Degraded shroud textile with a simple weave and a clump of human hair were discovered in one loculus together with skeletal remains of a primary burial of an adult.

    “What marked this tomb as unique from the other tombs in the Akeldama cemetery was the discovery of degraded shroud textile, with a simple weave and a clump of human hair, in one of the loculi together with the skeletal remains of a primary burial of an adult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Morphological analysis identified one osteological element, a phalanx from the hand, with secondary osseous remodeling lesions.

    “The morphological analysis did identify one osteological element, a phalanx (from the hand), that presented with secondary osseous remodeling lesions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There are three mitochondrial haplotypes shared between a number of the remains analyzed.

    “There are three mitochondrial haplotypes shared between a number of the remains analyzed suggesting a possible family tomb.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The phalanx lesions were not pathognomonic for any disease.

    “however these features were not pathognomonic for any disease”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 38
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Textiles from a burial shroud, hair and skeletal remains were found in the tomb.

    “More than twenty stone ossuaries for collecting human bones were found, along with textiles from a burial shroud, hair and skeletal remains.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    More than twenty stone ossuaries for collecting human bones were found in the tomb.

    “More than twenty stone ossuaries for the collection of human bone were found”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The tomb had been illegally entered and looted before archaeologists reached the site.

    “The tomb had been entered and looted before archaeologists reached the site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Sealing a loculus with white plaster is quite rare in the first-century tombs studied around Jerusalem.

    “a practice which is quite rare in the first century tombs studied around Jerusalem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The calibrated calendar date range of the shroud textile is 50 BCE-16 CE at one sigma and 95 BCE-53 CE at two sigma.

    “with calibrated calendar date ranges of one sigma: 50 BCE -16 CE and two sigma: 95 BCE -53 CE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The male individual suffered from tuberculosis and leprosy.

    “that suffered from tuberculosis and leprosy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither contamination nor the archaeologist's DNA was found in any of the results.

    “however neither contamination nor the archaeologist's DNA was found in any of the results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mtDNA analysis identified two mtDNA profiles shared between two individuals and one mtDNA profile shared between three individuals.

    “This mtDNA analysis has identified two mtDNA profiles that are shared between two individuals and one mtDNA profile that is shared between three individuals”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The female and one infant sample from SC2 had mtDNA type 2, and the second infant had mtDNA type 3.

    “The female and one of the infant samples had mtDNA type 2, and the second infant had mtDNA type 3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The fourth sample tested from SC7 did not produce a reliable mtDNA sequence but produced an IS6110 sequence and was not included in the study thereafter.

    “The fourth sample tested from SC7 did not produce a reliable mtDNA sequence but produced an IS6110 sequence and was not included in the study thereafter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four samples tested from SC7 were identified as one male and one female with different mtDNA types (type 5 and type 4 respectively).

    “There were four samples tested from the SC7 location (Figure 1). These were identified as one male and one female with different mtDNA types (mtDNA type 5 and type 4 respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The single sample tested from SC9 was identified as a male with mtDNA type 6, which did not match any other member of the tomb that was tested.

    “There was only one sample tested from the SC9 location (Figure 1). This sample was identified as a male with mtDNA type 6, which did not match any other member of the tomb that was tested.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The skeletal remains from within the plaster-sealed parts of the tomb (SC1 and SC2) are positive for M. tuberculosis and one of them for both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae.

    “It is interesting to note that the skeletal remains from within the plaster-sealed parts of the tomb (SC1 and SC2) are positive for M. tuberculosis and one of them for both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two SC17 samples had different mtDNA types, the female mtDNA type 5 and the other mtDNA type 7.

    “These samples both had different mtDNA types, the female mtDNA type 5 and the other mtDNA type 7.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two samples analyzed from SC4 produced the same mtDNA type 4 and were both male.

    “There were two samples analyzed from the Tomb of the Shroud SC4 location (Figure 1). Both these samples produced the same mtDNA type 4 and were both found to be male.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were two maternally related pairs of individuals: adult female SC2 and infant SC2, and adult female SC17 and adult male SC7.

    “From this analysis there have been identified two maternally unrelated male individuals (both adults from SC1 and SC9), two maternally unrelated sex indeterminate individuals (one adult SC17 and one infant SC2) and two maternally related pairs of individuals (adult female SC2 and infant SC2 and adult female SC17 and adult male SC7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four samples were tested from SC2; they were identified as a female and two infants for which sex was not identified.

    “There were four samples tested from the Tomb of the Shroud SC2 location (i.e. the ossilegium niche in the north wall of the lower chamber) (Figure 1). These were identified as a female and two infants for which their sex was not identified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All amplifications obtained from archaeological samples were identical to the NCBI Genbank sequence for IS6110 (X17348, bases 788-863) and the S12 protein (X70995).

    “All amplifications obtained from archaeological samples were identical to the NCBI Genbank sequence for IS6110 (sequence X17348, bases 788–863) and the S12 protein (sequence X70995 in the NCBI database) (Table 6 and 7).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Researchers adhered to standard ancient DNA and forensic protocols including laboratory coats, sleeves, double gloving, face mask, and frequent glove changes.

    “The researchers adhered to all standard ancient DNA and forensic protocols including the use of laboratory coats, sleeves, double gloving and face mask with frequent changes of gloves.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Tomb of the Shroud is one of very few examples of a preserved shrouded human burial.

    “The Tomb of the Shroud is one of very few examples of a preserved shrouded human burial”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mitochondria are maternally inherited organelles suitable for characterization of maternal relationships.

    “Mitochondria are maternally inherited organelles, suitable for characterization of maternal relationships [11], [12]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Bini C Pappalardo G 2005 mtDNA HVI length heteroplasmic profile in different tissues of maternally related members. Forensic Science International 152 35 38 15939174 source
    • cites [12] Schultes T Hummel S Herrmann B 2000 Ancient DNA-typing approaches for the determination of kinship in a disturbed collective burial site. Anthropol Anz 58 37 44 10816784 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The first report of M. leprae DNA in human remains was from the seventh century C.E.

    “This was quickly followed by the first report of M. leprae DNA in human remains from the seventh century C.E. [17], [18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Rafi A Spigelman M Stanford J Lemma E Donoghue H 1994 Mycobacterium leprae DNA from ancient bone detected by PCR. Lancet 343 1360 1361 7910345 source
    • cites [18] Rafi A Spigelman M Stanford J Lemma E Donoghue H 1994 DNA of Mycobacterium leprae Detected by PCR in Ancient Bone. International journal of Osteoarchaeology 4 287 290

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A separate room with a different set of pipettes was used for handling PCR product.

    “A separate room with a different set of pipettes was used for handling PCR product.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Bone samples were UV irradiated at 254 nm for 24-48 hours to crosslink surface contaminating DNA from soil bacteria or handling.

    “These were first placed under UV irradiation with 254 nm wavelength for 24–48 hours, depending on the size of the sample, to crosslink any surface contaminating DNA from soil bacteria or handling.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The Tomb of the Shroud is the only example of a plaster sealed loculus with remains genetically confirmed to have belonged to a shrouded male individual.

    “the only example of a plaster sealed loculus with remains genetically confirmed to have belonged to a shrouded male individual that suffered from tuberculosis and leprosy dating to the first-century C.E.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The target mtDNA region is small and thus errors could be introduced in the identification of relationship amongst a random sample population.

    “However the target region is small and thus errors could be introduced in the identification of relationship amongst a random sample population.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Paleo-DNA Laboratory follows strict standard operating procedures (SOPs).

    “The Paleo-DNA Laboratory also carries out forensic case work and follows strict standard operating procedures (SOPs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Identification of the causative agent for the lesion is hindered by the disturbed nature of the skeletal remains and limited preservation of skeletal elements.

    “The identification of the causative agent for the lesion is hindered by the disturbed nature of the skeletal remains (caused by the illegal looters of the tomb), and limited preservation of skeletal elements, especially those in association with the affected region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Positive control DNA was diluted to simulate ancient DNA concentrations and added in a separate room from PCR preparation.

    “The positive control DNA was diluted to simulate ancient DNA concentrations and was added to the positive control reaction tubes in a separate room from where the PCR reactions were prepared, before being loaded onto the thermal cycler.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Extraction negatives were used to ensure no contamination entered the samples.

    “The whole procedure was performed with extraction negatives to ensure that no contamination had entered the samples during this process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Extraction negative control tubes were always processed in parallel with tubes containing samples.

    “Extraction negative control tubes were always processed in parallel with tubes containing samples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The discovery of preserved shroud textile in this tomb is rare because high humidity in the Jerusalem area does not usually allow preservation of organic material.

    “This discovery is rare because high levels of humidity in the Jerusalem area does not usually allow for the preservation of organic material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: High levels of humidity in the Jerusalem area do not usually allow for the preservation of organic material.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The first pathogenic DNA recovered from archaeological remains was M. tuberculosis.

    “The first pathogenic DNA recovered from archaeological remains was M. tuberculosis [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Spigelman M Lemma E 1993 The use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in ancient skeletons. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 3 137 143

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Laboratory controls are taken every month, with surfaces swabbed and analyzed for contamination.

    “Laboratory controls are taken every month, where all the surfaces are swabbed and analyzed for contamination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The working area and equipment were bleached, washed, sterilized, and UV-irradiated before and after each sample preparation.

    “The working area was bleached and washed with 3.0% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite solution followed by 70% ethanol before and after each sample preparation and all equipment was sterilized before use. The equipment and the work area were UV-irradiated prior to each preparation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Stringent precautions were taken to avoid contamination in London, including sterile reagents, tubes, plugged tips, clean protective clothing, and frequent glove changes.

    “Stringent precautions were taken to avoid contamination. Sterile reagents, tubes and plugged tips were used and clean protective clothing worn, with frequent glove changes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Co-infection of two mycobacterial diseases is not uncommon and has been previously identified.

    “however, the co-infection of two mycobacterial diseases is not uncommon and has been previously identified [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Donoghue HD Marcsik A Matheson C Vernon K Nuorala E 2005 Co-infection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae in human archaeological samples: a possible explanation for the historical decline of leprosy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 272 389 394 15734693 PMC1634979 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Paleo-DNA Laboratory has separated pre-PCR, post-PCR and PCR areas all with separate air handling systems.

    “The facility has separated pre-PCR, post-PCR and PCR areas all with separate air handling systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The preservation and persistence of ancient bacterial DNA in the archaeological record is controversial.

    “The preservation and persistence of ancient bacterial DNA in the archaeological record is controversial [25]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Willerslev E Hansen AJ Ronn R Brand TB Barnes I 2004 Long-term persistence of bacterial DNA. Curr Biol 14 R9 10 14711425 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Standard molecular archaeology protocols were applied for analysis of the Tomb of the Shroud samples at the Hebrew University and replicated at Lakehead University and University College London.

    “Standard molecular archaeology protocols were applied for analysis of the Tomb of the Shroud samples at the ancient DNA laboratory in the Kuvin Centre for Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Hebrew University (Israel) and replicated at the Paleo-DNA Laboratory, Lakehead University (Canada) and at the Department of Infection, University College London (UK).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Both negative and positive controls were always included in PCR.

    “The DNA extract (10.0 µl) was added to each tube and both negative and positive controls were always included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Bone material from inside the bone was removed by a dental pick while the surface was left intact to ensure no contamination.

    “To ensure there was no contamination, bone material from inside the bone was removed by a dental pick while the surface of the bone was left intact.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The archaeologist's DNA was characterised for reference to eliminate possible contamination.

    “The archaeologist's DNA was characterised for reference to eliminate possible contamination”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Permission for this research was provided by the Israeli Antiquities Authority and the archaeologists who excavated the material.

    “Permission for this research was provided by the Israeli Antiquities Authority and the archaeologists who excavated the material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Multiple primer sets were included to address fragmentation.

    “These multiple primer sets were included to address fragmentation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    PCR reagent preparations were physically separated from sample preparation and PCR in separate rooms with separate air supply.

    “Standard precautions to minimize contamination were employed, sterile tubes and plugged tips under UV hoods where PCR reagent preparations were physically separated, from both sample preparation and PCR, in separate rooms with separate air supply.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Paleo-DNA Laboratory is a dedicated ancient DNA facility with stringent precautions and protocols for degraded DNA.

    “The Paleo-DNA Laboratory is a dedicated ancient DNA facility with stringent precautions and protocols employed for the analysis of degraded DNA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The recovery of ancient or degraded DNA is challenging and hindered by chemical modifications and fragmentation.

    “The recovery of ancient or degraded DNA is challenging and hindered by forms of damage, including chemical modifications and fragmentation of the DNA [3], [4], [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] O'Rourke DH Hayes MG Carlyle SW 2000 Ancient DNA Studies in Physical Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 29 217 242

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4] Willerslev E Cooper A 2005 Ancient DNA. Proc Biol Sci 272 3 16 15875564 PMC1634942 source
    • cites [5] Hofreiter M Serre D Poinar HN Kuch M Pääbo S 2001 Ancient DNA. Nature Reviews Genetics 2 353 359 11331901 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sediment samples from around the tomb and scrapings from the rock walls and loculus roof were analyzed for pathogenic mycobacterial DNA or environmental DNA causing non-specific results.

    “Sediment samples from around the tomb and scrapings from the rock walls and loculus roof were analyzed for the presence of any pathogenic mycobacterial DNA or environmental DNA causing non-specific results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The M. tuberculosis and M. leprae procedure was replicated in London on samples of the SC1 and SC2 individuals.

    “The amplification of the M. tuberculosis and M. leprae procedure was replicated in London on samples of the SC1 and SC2 individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Amplification of mitochondrial DNA from these same samples and both positive and negative results for pathogenic DNA from these tombs, in addition to logical and expected results for the haplogroups identified, supports authentic results.

    “Amplification of the mitochondrial DNA from these same samples and both positive and negative results for pathogenic DNA from these tombs in addition to logical and expected results for the haplogroups identified supports authentic results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    A co-infection of tuberculosis and leprosy was an unexpected discovery in the remains of the shrouded individual and presents a significant and unique anthropological example of contagious disease in the past.

    “A co-infection of tuberculosis and leprosy was an unexpected discovery in the remains of the shrouded individual and present a significant and unique anthropological example of contagious disease in the past.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The skeletal remains in the wall niche were those of the two infants with tuberculosis and a maternally related adult female, possibly the mother.

    “The skeletal remains in the wall niche were those of the two infants with tuberculosis and a maternally related adult female, possibly the mother.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Identification of M. tuberculosis from the tooth pulp of these individuals suggests that this pathogen was in the bloodstream and therefore throughout the body as miliary tuberculosis.

    “Identification of M. tuberculosis from the tooth pulp of these individuals suggests that this pathogen was in the bloodstream and therefore throughout the body as miliary tuberculosis and all three individuals would have almost certainly have died from a disseminated bacterial infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The co-infection of leprosy with tuberculosis is often the cause of death as M. leprae infection generates a compromised immune system, vulnerable to a subsequent M. tuberculosis infection that is still fatal in some parts of the world today.

    “The co-infection of leprosy with tuberculosis is often the cause of death as M. leprae infection generates a compromised immune system, vulnerable to a subsequent M. tuberculosis infection that is still fatal in some parts of the world today.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The presence of both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae DNA is associated with immuno-suppressed individuals, which is a feature of the multi-bacillary or lepromatous form of leprosy.
    • Rests on an assumption: On infection the individual becomes immuno-compromised and the chance of co-infection by M. tuberculosis and other pathogens occurs.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The molecular identification of tuberculosis in the Jerusalem tomb is a significant contribution to the archaeological interpretation of this site and suggests a reason for the plaster sealing of the loculus containing the shrouded man and for the additional individuals sealed in the wall niche.

    “The molecular identification of tuberculosis in the Jerusalem tomb is a significant contribution to the archaeological interpretation of this site and suggests a reason for the plaster sealing of the loculus containing the shrouded man and for the additional individuals sealed in the wall niche.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A secondary co-infection of tuberculosis in Hansen's patients is found in 25% of modern cases.

    “A secondary co-infection of tuberculosis, in Hansen's patients is found in 25% of modern cases [50], and up to one-third of the world's population is currently infected with tuberculosis (WHO 2007: World Health Organisation: http://www.who.int/tb).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] Jayalakshmi P Looi LM Lim KJ Rajogopalan K 1987 Autopsy findings in 35 cases of leprosy in Malaysia. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 55 510 514 3655465
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Up to one-third of the world's population is currently infected with tuberculosis.

    “A secondary co-infection of tuberculosis, in Hansen's patients is found in 25% of modern cases [50], and up to one-third of the world's population is currently infected with tuberculosis (WHO 2007: World Health Organisation: http://www.who.int/tb).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites WHO 2007: World Health Organisation: http://www.who.int/tb

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Molecular pathology adds a new dimension to the archaeological exploration of disease in ancient times, especially in regard to the remains of infants where there is an absence of bone pathologies.

    “Molecular pathology adds a new dimension to the archaeological exploration of disease in ancient times, especially in regard to the remains of infants where there is an absence of bone pathologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The maternal relatedness of these individuals supports inferences that this Akeldama site was a family tomb which was in use in the first-century C.E.

    “The maternal relatedness of these individuals supports inferences that this Akeldama site was a family tomb which was in use in the first-century C.E.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The presence of the lesion supports the genetic identification of M. tuberculosis bacilli in all the skeletal elements analyzed and the severe nature of the infection.

    “The presence of this lesion supports the genetic identification of M. tuberculosis bacilli in all the skeletal elements analyzed and the severe nature of the infection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The mtDNA analysis confirmed the textile was associated with the hair found in loculus SC1 and that the textile was draped or shrouded over the hair and head region.

    “The mtDNA analysis also confirmed the textile was associated with the hair found in loculus SC1 and that the textile was draped or shrouded over the hair and head region.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The fourth sample from SC2 had the same mtDNA type and morphological size as one of the three individuals and was concluded to be a replicate sample.

    “The fourth sample was found to have the same mtDNA type and morphological size as one of the three individuals concluded to be a replicate sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Co-infection presents a plausible explanation for the unusual and extreme lengths people went to in order to contain what was recognized as a seriously debilitating affliction.

    “Co-infection present a plausible explanation for the unusual and extreme lengths people went to in order to contain what was recognized as a seriously debilitating affliction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Genetic analysis confirmed the archaeologist's interpretation of this tomb as a family tomb containing a number of generations and provided important information on the bioarchaeology not available through skeletal analysis.

    “Genetic analysis confirmed the archaeologist's interpretation of this tomb as a family tomb containing a number of generations and provided important information on the bioarchaeology not available through skeletal analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    It confirms the presence of tuberculosis using molecular methods and is the oldest molecular confirmation of both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae in Jerusalem.

    “It confirms the presence of tuberculosis using molecular methods and is the oldest molecular confirmation of both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae in Jerusalem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The individuals from the wall niche undoubtedly underwent secondary burial, meaning that their bones were extracted from a loculus and placed into the niche.

    “However, as previously mentioned, the individuals from the wall niche undoubtedly underwent secondary burial, meaning that their bones were extracted from a loculus and placed into the niche.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The prevalence of such a highly contagious disease, particularly for immuno-compromised individuals with leprosy, is not unexpected with inadequate sanitation and demonstrates the significant impact social diseases such as tuberculosis had on society from the low socioeconomic groups up to the more affluent families, such as Tomb the Shroud in first-century Jerusalem.

    “The prevalence of such a highly contagious disease, particularly for immuno-compromised individuals with leprosy is not unexpected with inadequate sanitation and demonstrates the significant impact social diseases such as tuberculosis had on society from the low socioeconomic groups up to the more affluent families, such as Tomb the Shroud in first-century Jerusalem.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
68 of 68
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    High levels of humidity in the Jerusalem area do not usually allow for the preservation of organic material.

    “This discovery is rare because high levels of humidity in the Jerusalem area does not usually allow for the preservation of organic material.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No other first-century tomb from Jerusalem has ever been examined by molecular methods.

    “The genetic analysis was performed because no other first century tomb from Jerusalem has ever been examined by molecular methods and this particular tomb has remains that are unique within this region - specifically the discovery of textiles that form part of a burial shroud from the first century.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Polymorphisms in the analyzed mtDNA region are identical in most maternally related individuals, enabling maternal relatedness to be inferred.

    “Polymorphisms in this region will be identical in most maternally related individuals enabling the individuation and maternal relatedness of remains to be interpreted from a familial sample population (Table 4).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the first century C.E., the general Jewish practice was for a primary burial to be placed in a loculus until decomposition, then bones transferred to a repository or ossuary.

    “The general Jewish practice in the first century C.E. was for a primary burial to be placed within a loculus until the decomposition of organic remains had taken place, at which point - approximately a year later - the bones were then taken out of the loculus and transferred into a repository (a pit or wall niche) or into a stone ossuary.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Infants rarely survive to an age where M. tuberculosis lesions are evident in the skeletal material.

    “although infants rarely survive to an age where M. tuberculosis lesions are evident in the skeletal material”
    “although infants rarely survive long enough for tuberculosis bone lesions to form”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tuberculosis is an opportunistic pathogenic disease common and generally fatal in antiquity throughout Europe and the Middle East.

    “Tuberculosis is an opportunistic pathogenic disease common and generally fatal in antiquity throughout Europe and the Middle East.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sealing parts of the tomb with white plaster is generally rare in first-century C.E. tombs in Jerusalem.

    “Sealing parts of the tomb with white plaster is generally rare in first-century C.E. tombs in Jerusalem.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence of both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae DNA is associated with immuno-suppressed individuals, which is a feature of the multi-bacillary or lepromatous form of leprosy.

    “The presence of both M. tuberculosis and M. leprae DNA is associated with immuno-suppressed individuals, which is a feature of the multi-bacillary or lepromatous form of leprosy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The differential preservation of mitochondrial and pathogenic DNA, with amplification intensity of pathogenic DNA far greater than mitochondrial DNA, suggests a higher concentration of pathogenic DNA template.

    “The differential preservation of mitochondrial and pathogenic DNA has been noted in many cases as the amplification intensity of pathogenic DNA, is far greater than the amplification intensity of mitochondrial DNA suggesting a higher concentration of pathogenic DNA template.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The health of expelled lepromatous individuals is probably compromised, without assistance for food procurement or an income.

    “The health of expelled lepromatous individuals is probably compromised, without assistance for food procurement or an income.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    On infection the individual becomes immuno-compromised and the chance of co-infection by M. tuberculosis and other pathogens occurs.

    “On infection the individual becomes immuno-compromised and the chance of co-infection by M. tuberculosis and other pathogens occurs.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Not all ten SC1 samples yielded an mtDNA profile

    Major

    The discussion says all ten SC1 samples produced the same mtDNA profile, but Table 5 records no positive mtDNA amplification for several of them, including SC1 F1.

  • Not all analyzed SC1 skeletal elements tested positive for tuberculosis

    Minor

    The claim that tuberculosis DNA was identified in all analyzed skeletal elements conflicts with Table 5: the SC1 B1 bone fragment was negative for both tuberculosis targets.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Cann RL 1994 mtDNA and Native americans: a sourthern perspective. American Journal of Human Genetics 55 7 11 7517627 PMC1918228
  2. [15]Schultes T Hummel S Herrmann B 1999 Ancient DNA-typing approaches for determination of kinship in a disturbed collective burial site. Anthropo Anz in press 10816784
  3. [54]Finken M Kirschner P Meier A Wrede A Bottger EC 1993 Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol Microbiol 9 1239 1246 7934937

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Matheson, C. D., Vernon, K. K., Lahti, A., Fratpietro, R., Spigelman, M., Gibson, S., Greenblatt, C. L., & Donoghue, H. D.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Matheson, Carney D.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-12-16
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
e8319
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052689921
Cited by
68
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
54.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lakehead University
  • University College London
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
1st century AD, ossuaries, mitochondrial DNA, family relationships, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, leprosy, tuberculosis, ancient pathogens, bioarchaeology, ancient DNA
MeSH terms
Archaeology, Base Sequence, Bone and Bones, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Fossils, Humans, Israel, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Mummies, Mycobacterium leprae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Paleopathology, Polymorphism, Genetic, Sex Characteristics, Sequence Alignment, Forensic Anthropology, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review