The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case
Abstract
In this paper, we provide quantitative evidence showing that languages spoken by many second language speakers tend to have relatively small nominal case systems or no nominal case at all. In our sample, all languages with more than 50% second language speakers had no nominal case. The negative association between the number of second language speakers and nominal case complexity generalizes to different language areas and families. As there are many studies attesting to the difficulty of acquiring morphological case in second language acquisition, this result supports the idea that languages adapt to the cognitive constraints of their speakers, as well as to the sociolinguistic niches of their speaking communities. We discuss our results with respect to sociolinguistic typology and the Linguistic Niche Hypothesis, as well as with respect to qualitative data from historical linguistics. All in all, multiple lines of evidence converge on the idea that morphosyntactic complexity is reduced by a high degree of language contact involving adult learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
Dryer, M. S., Haspelmath, M., & Forkel, R. (2022) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7135714 · Cited by 2,542
Ethnologue. Languages of the World
(2014) · African Studies Companion Online · doi:10.1163/_afco_asc_441 · Cited by 2,162
Language Contact: An Introduction
Thomason, S. G. (2001) · Cited by 1,750
Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time
Nichols, J. (1992) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 · Cited by 1,654
The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations
Dryer, M. S. (1992) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0028 · Cited by 1,323
Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity
TRUDGILL, P. W. (2011) · Cited by 1,041
Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models
Schielzeth, H., & Forstmeier, W. (2009) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arn145 · Cited by 952
Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages
Clyne, M. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606526 · Cited by 842
Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008559 · Cited by 786
Cited by
Cognitive and linguistic biases in morphology learning
Finley, S. (2018) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1467 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentz, C., & Winter, B.
- Venue
- Language Dynamics and Change
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 2210-5824 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5832
- OpenAlex
- W1514057855
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 49.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/22105832-13030105
- The paper
- Bentz, C., & Winter, B. (2013). Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case. Language Dynamics and Change. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-13030105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.