Cited by 437Language and cultural evolutionPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLinguistics and language evolution

On the antiquity of language: the reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences

Open access
Dediu, Dan, Levinson, Stephen C.·2013·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

It is usually assumed that modern language is a recent phenomenon, coinciding with the emergence of modern humans themselves. Many assume as well that this is the result of a single, sudden mutation giving rise to the full "modern package." However, we argue here that recognizably modern language is likely an ancient feature of our genus pre-dating at least the common ancestor of modern humans and Neandertals about half a million years ago. To this end, we adduce a broad range of evidence from linguistics, genetics, paleontology, and archaeology clearly suggesting that Neandertals shared with us something like modern speech and language. This reassessment of the antiquity of modern language, from the usually quoted 50,000-100,000 years to half a million years, has profound consequences for our understanding of our own evolution in general and especially for the sciences of speech and language. As such, it argues against a saltationist scenario for the evolution of language, and toward a gradual process of culture-gene co-evolution extending to the present day. Another consequence is that the present-day linguistic diversity might better reflect the properties of the design space for language and not just the vagaries of history, and could also contain traces of the languages spoken by other human forms such as the Neandertals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Conard N. J. Niven L. (2001). The Paleolithic Finds from Bollschweil and the Question of Neandertal Mammoth Hunting in the Black Forest in the world of elephants, in Proceedings of the First International Congress, eds Cavaretta G. Giola P. Mussi M. Palumbo M. R. (Roma: Universista La Sapienza), 194– 200
  2. Gil D. (2011). Obligatory vs. optional tense-aspect-mood marking: areal patterns and historical developments” in International conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHLXX) (Osaka).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Dediu, Dan
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
4
Pages
397-397
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115969311
Cited by
437
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 5
FWCI
430.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
Keywords
Neanderthals, origin of language, language evolution, modern human evolution, language and speech, saltationism, linguistic diversity, hominin cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review