The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential DNA Methylation Correlates with Differential Expression of Angiogenic Factors in Human Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Epigenetic mechanisms such as microRNA and histone modification are crucially responsible for dysregulated gene expression in heart failure. In contrast, the role of DNA methylation, another well-characterized epigenetic mark, is unknown. In order to examine whether human cardiomyopathy of different etiologies are connected by a unifying pattern of DNA methylation pattern, we undertook profiling with ischaemic and idiopathic end-stage cardiomyopathic left ventricular (LV) explants from patients who had undergone cardiac transplantation compared to normal control. We performed a preliminary analysis using methylated-DNA immunoprecipitation-chip (MeDIP-chip), validated differential methylation loci by bisulfite-(BS) PCR and high throughput sequencing, and identified 3 angiogenesis-related genetic loci that were differentially methylated. Using quantitative RT-PCR, we found that the expression of these genes differed significantly between CM hearts and normal control (p<0.01). Moreover, for each individual LV tissue, differential methylation showed a predicted correlation to differential expression of the corresponding gene. Thus, differential DNA methylation exists in human cardiomyopathy. In this series of heterogeneous cardiomyopathic LV explants, differential DNA methylation was found in at least 3 angiogenesis-related genes. While in other systems, changes in DNA methylation at specific genomic loci usually precede changes in the expression of corresponding genes, our current findings in cardiomyopathy merit further investigation to determine whether DNA methylation changes play a causative role in the progression of heart failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins
Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien, F., Ballestar, M. L., Heine-Suñer, D., Cigudosa, J. C., Urioste, M., Benitez, J., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0500398102 · Cited by 3,602
Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators.
Klose, R. J., & Bird, A. P. (2006) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008 · Cited by 2,501
Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility
Jirtle, R. L., & Skinner, M. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2045 · Cited by 2,492
Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms
Cedar, H., & Bergman, Y. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2540 · Cited by 2,267 · cited 2×
“Although in this study, we have examined the effect of DNA methylation on local proximal gene expression, instead of a linear series of genes and promoters, the 3-D model of transcriptional regulatory networks [32] suggests that altered DNA methylation may influence the expression of genes in sites that are distal or…”
BackgroundEpigenomic Profiling Reveals DNA-Methylation Changes Associated with Major Psychosis
Mill, J., Tang, T., Kaminsky, Z., Khare, T., Yazdanpanah, S., Bouchard, L., Jia, P., Assadzadeh, A., Flanagan, J., Schumacher, A., et al. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.008 · Cited by 773
Non-CpG methylation of the PGC-1α promoter through DNMT3B controls mitochondrial density.
Barrès, R., Osler, M. E., Yan, J., Rune, A., Fritz, T., Caidahl, K., Krook, A., & Zierath, J. R. (2009) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2009.07.011 · Cited by 602
Cited by
Non-coding RNAs as regulators of gene expression and epigenetics
Kaikkonen, M. U., Lam, M. T. Y., & Glass, C. K. (2011) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvr097 · Cited by 764
The signature of maternal rearing in the methylome in rhesus macaque prefrontal cortex and T cells
Provençal, N., Suderman, M. J., Guillemin, C., Massart, R., Ruggiero, A., Wang, D., Bennett, A. J., Pierre, P. J., Friedman, D. P., Côté, S. M., et al. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1470-12.2012 · Cited by 312
Making sense of the ageing methylome
Seale, K., Horvath, S., Teschendorff, A., Eynon, N., & Voisin, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00477-6 · Cited by 274
Vukojevic, V., Kolassa, I.-T., Fastenrath, M., Gschwind, L., Spalek, K., Milnik, A., Heck, A., Vogler, C., Wilker, S., Demougin, P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1526-14.2014 · Cited by 168
Platelet mitochondrial DNA methylation: a potential new marker of cardiovascular disease
Baccarelli, A. A., & Byun, H.-M. (2015) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-015-0078-0 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Movassagh, M., Choy, M.-K., Goddard, M., Bennett, M. R., Down, T. A., & Foo, R. S.-Y.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-01-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e8564
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998554580
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential DNA Methylation Correlates with Differential Expression of Angiogenic Factors in Human Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0008564
- The paper
- Movassagh, M., Choy, M.-K., Goddard, M., Bennett, M. R., Down, T. A., & Foo, R. S.-Y. (2010). Differential DNA Methylation Correlates with Differential Expression of Angiogenic Factors in Human Heart Failure. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.