The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Resolving threats to widely distributed marine megafauna requires definition of the geographic distributions of both the threats as well as the population unit(s) of interest. In turn, because individual threats can operate on varying spatial scales, their impacts can affect different segments of a population of the same species. Therefore, integration of multiple tools and techniques--including site-based monitoring, genetic analyses, mark-recapture studies and telemetry--can facilitate robust definitions of population segments at multiple biological and spatial scales to address different management and research challenges. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To address these issues for marine turtles, we collated all available studies on marine turtle biogeography, including nesting sites, population abundances and trends, population genetics, and satellite telemetry. We georeferenced this information to generate separate layers for nesting sites, genetic stocks, and core distributions of population segments of all marine turtle species. We then spatially integrated this information from fine- to coarse-spatial scales to develop nested envelope models, or Regional Management Units (RMUs), for marine turtles globally. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The RMU framework is a solution to the challenge of how to organize marine turtles into units of protection above the level of nesting populations, but below the level of species, within regional entities that might be on independent evolutionary trajectories. Among many potential applications, RMUs provide a framework for identifying data gaps, assessing high diversity areas for multiple species and genetic stocks, and evaluating conservation status of marine turtles. Furthermore, RMUs allow for identification of geographic barriers to gene flow, and can provide valuable guidance to marine spatial planning initiatives that integrate spatial distributions of protected species and human activities. In addition, the RMU framework--including maps and supporting metadata--will be an iterative, user-driven tool made publicly available in an online application for comments, improvements, download and analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6872 · Cited by 12,728
Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation
Moritz, C. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4 · Cited by 3,348
Electronic tagging and population structure of Atlantic bluefin tuna
Block, B. A., Teo, S. L. H., Walli, A., Boustany, A., Stokesbury, M. J. W., Farwell, C. J., Weng, K. C., Dewar, H., & Williams, T. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03463 · Cited by 781 · cited 1×
“RMUs provide explicit, ecologically based spatial and demographic information about geographic distributions of marine turtle populations that could be integrated with other georeferenced layers, including human activities subject to management (e.g. fisheries operations, hydrocarbon extraction, coastal development, s…”
BackgroundThe Biology of Sea Turtles, Volume I
(2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203737088 · Cited by 728
Hamann, M., Godfrey, M., Seminoff, J., Arthur, K., Barata, P., Bjorndal, K., Bolten, A., Broderick, A., Campbell, L., Carreras, C., et al. (2010) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr00279 · Cited by 641
Self-citationGuiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning
Foley, M. M., Halpern, B. S., Micheli, F., Armsby, M. H., Caldwell, M. R., Crain, C. M., Prahler, E., Rohr, N., Sivas, D., Beck, M. W., et al. (2010) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.001 · Cited by 571
Essential ecological insights for marine ecosystem-based management and marine spatial planning
Crowder, L., & Norse, E. (2008) · Marine Policy · doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.012 · Cited by 539
Population genetics and phylogeography of sea turtles
BOWEN, B. W., & KARL, S. A. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03542.x · Cited by 505
Self-citationIntegrating genetic data into management of marine resources: how can we do it better?
Waples, R. S., Punt, A. E., & Cope, J. M. (2008) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00303.x · Cited by 373
Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks
Jorgensen, S. J., Reeb, C. A., Chapple, T. K., Anderson, S., Perle, C., Van Sommeran, S. R., Fritz-Cope, C., Brown, A. C., Klimley, A. P., & Block, B. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1155 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays
Dulvy, N. K., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A., Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Harrison, L. R., Carlson, J. K., Davidson, L. N., Fordham, S. V., Francis, M. P., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00590 · Cited by 2,047
Self-citationTransfection types, methods and strategies: a technical review
Chong, Z. X., Yeap, S. K., & Ho, W. Y. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11165 · Cited by 303
The evolution of phenylpropanoid metabolism in the green lineage
Tohge, T., Watanabe, M., Hoefgen, R., & Fernie, A. R. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.3109/10409238.2012.758083 · Cited by 296
Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet
Bowen, B. W., Gaither, M. R., DiBattista, J. D., Iacchei, M., Andrews, K. R., Grant, W. S., Toonen, R. J., & Briggs, J. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602404113 · Cited by 285
Self-citationMigratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs
Lascelles, B., Notarbartolo Di Sciara, G., Agardy, T., Cuttelod, A., Eckert, S., Glowka, L., Hoyt, E., Llewellyn, F., Louzao, M., Ridoux, V., et al. (2014) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2512 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, B. P., DiMatteo, A. D., Hurley, B. J., Finkbeiner, E. M., Bolten, A. B., Chaloupka, M. Y., Hutchinson, B. J., Abreu-Grobois, F. A., Amorocho, D., Bjorndal, K. A., Bourjea, J., Bowen, B. W., Dueñas, R. B., Casale, P., Choudhury, B. C., Costa, A., Dutton, P. H., Fallabrino, A., Girard, A., Girondot, M., Godfrey, M. H., Hamann, M., López-Mendilaharsu, M., Marcovaldi, M. A., Mortimer, J. A., Musick, J. A., Nel, R., Pilcher, N. J., Seminoff, J. A., Troëng, S., Witherington, B., & Mast, R. B.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-12-17
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e15465
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159170056
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 27.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0015465
- The paper
- Wallace, B. P., DiMatteo, A. D., Hurley, B. J., Finkbeiner, E. M., Bolten, A. B., Chaloupka, M. Y., Hutchinson, B. J., Abreu-Grobois, F. A., Amorocho, D., Bjorndal, K. A., Bourjea, J., Bowen, B. W., Dueñas, R. B., Casale, P., Choudhury, B. C., Costa, A., Dutton, P. H., Fallabrino, A., Girard, A., . . . Mast, R. B. (2010). Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015465
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.