Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 641

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century

Open access
Hamann, M, Godfrey, MH, Seminoff, JA, Arthur, K, Barata, PCR, Bjorndal, KA, Bolten, AB, Broderick, AC, Campbell, LM, Carreras, C, Casale, P, Chaloupka, M, Chan, SKF, Coyne, MS, Crowder, LB, Diez, CE, Dutton, PH, Epperly, SP, FitzSimmons, NN, Formia, A, Girondot, M, Hays, GC, Cheng, IS, Kaska, Y, Lewison, R, Mortimer, JA, Nichols, WJ, Reina, RD, Shanker, K, Spotila, JR, Tomás, J, Wallace, BP, Work, TM, Zbinden, J, Godley, BJ·2010·Endangered Species Research

Abstract

Over the past 3 decades, the status of sea turtles and the need for their protection to aid population recovery have increasingly captured the interest of government agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the general public worldwide. This interest has been matched by increased research attention, focusing on a wide variety of topics relating to sea turtle biology and ecology, together with the interrelations of sea turtles with the physical and natural environments. Although sea turtles have been better studied than most other marine fauna, management actions and their evaluation are often hindered by the lack of data on turtle biology, human-turtle interactions, turtle population status and threats. In an effort to inform effective sea turtle conservation a list of priority research questions was assembled based on the opinions of 35 sea turtle researchers from 13 nations working in fields related to turtle biology and/or conservation. The combined experience of the contributing researchers spanned the globe as well as many relevant disciplines involved in conservation research. An initial list of more than 200 questions gathered from respondents was condensed into 20 metaquestions and classified under 5 categories: reproductive biology, biogeography, population ecology, threats and conservation strategies. © Inter-Research 2010.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/esr00279

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 641

Metadata

Authors
Hamann, M., Godfrey, M., Seminoff, J., Arthur, K., Barata, P., Bjorndal, K., Bolten, A., Broderick, A., Campbell, L., Carreras, C., Casale, P., Chaloupka, M., Chan, S., Coyne, M., Crowder, L., Diez, C., Dutton, P., Epperly, S., FitzSimmons, N., Formia, A., Girondot, M., Hays, G., Cheng, I., Kaska, Y., Lewison, R., Mortimer, J., Nichols, W., Reina, R., Shanker, K., Spotila, Jr., Tomás, J., Wallace, B., Work, T., Zbinden, J., & Godley, B.
Venue
Endangered Species Research
Published
2010-05-26
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
245-269
ISSN
  • 1613-4796 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-5407
OpenAlex
W2137223485
Cited by
641
References
4
FWCI
28.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/esr00279
The paper
Hamann, M., Godfrey, M., Seminoff, J., Arthur, K., Barata, P., Bjorndal, K., Bolten, A., Broderick, A., Campbell, L., Carreras, C., Casale, P., Chaloupka, M., Chan, S., Coyne, M., Crowder, L., Diez, C., Dutton, P., Epperly, S., FitzSimmons, N., . . . Godley, B. (2010). Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century. Endangered Species Research. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00279

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.