The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TCM Database@Taiwan: The World's Largest Traditional Chinese Medicine Database for Drug Screening In Silico
Open accessAbstract
Rapid advancing computational technologies have greatly speeded up the development of computer-aided drug design (CADD). Recently, pharmaceutical companies have increasingly shifted their attentions toward traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for novel lead compounds. Despite the growing number of studies on TCM, there is no free 3D small molecular structure database of TCM available for virtual screening or molecular simulation. To address this shortcoming, we have constructed TCM Database@Taiwan (http://tcm.cmu.edu.tw/) based on information collected from Chinese medical texts and scientific publications. TCM Database@Taiwan is currently the world's largest non-commercial TCM database. This web-based database contains more than 20,000 pure compounds isolated from 453 TCM ingredients. Both cdx (2D) and Tripos mol2 (3D) formats of each pure compound in the database are available for download and virtual screening. The TCM database includes both simple and advanced web-based query options that can specify search clauses, such as molecular properties, substructures, TCM ingredients, and TCM classification, based on intended drug actions. The TCM database can be easily accessed by all researchers conducting CADD. Over the last eight years, numerous volunteers have devoted their time to analyze TCM ingredients from Chinese medical texts as well as to construct structure files for each isolated compound. We believe that TCM Database@Taiwan will be a milestone on the path towards modernizing traditional Chinese medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening
Irwin, J. J., & Shoichet, B. K. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci049714+ · Cited by 4,058
Cited by
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Network Pharmacology Databases for Traditional Chinese Medicine: Review and Assessment
Zhang, R., Zhu, X., Bai, H., & Ning, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00123 · Cited by 1,257
Chen, Y.-C. (2015) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.12.001 · Cited by 611
A Systematic Cheminformatics Analysis of Functional Groups Occurring in Natural Products
Ertl, P., & Schuhmann, T. (2019) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b01022 · Cited by 358
Network Pharmacology: A Rosetta Stone for Traditional Chinese Medicine
Hao, D. C., & Xiao, P. G. (2014) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.21214 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C. Y.-C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-01-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e15939
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111581388
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TCM Database@Taiwan: The World's Largest Traditional Chinese Medicine Database for Drug Screening In Silico. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0015939
- The paper
- Chen, C. Y.-C. (2011). TCM Database@Taiwan: The World's Largest Traditional Chinese Medicine Database for Drug Screening In Silico. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.