Cited by 100Probiotics and Fermented FoodsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Complete Sequencing and Pan-Genomic Analysis of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Reveal Its Genetic Basis for Industrial Yogurt Production

Open access
Hao, Pei, Zheng, Huajun, Yu, Yao, Ding, Guohui, Gu, Wenyi, Chen, Shuting, Yu, Zhonghao, Ren, Shuangxi +6 more·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Lb. bulgaricus) is an important species of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) used for cheese and yogurt fermentation. The genome of Lb. bulgaricus 2038, an industrial strain mainly used for yogurt production, was completely sequenced and compared against the other two ATCC collection strains of the same subspecies. Specific physiological properties of strain 2038, such as lysine biosynthesis, formate production, aspartate-related carbon-skeleton intermediate metabolism, unique EPS synthesis and efficient DNA restriction/modification systems, are all different from those of the collection strains that might benefit the industrial production of yogurt. Other common features shared by Lb. bulgaricus strains, such as efficient protocooperation with Streptococcus thermophilus and lactate production as well as well-equipped stress tolerance mechanisms may account for it being selected originally for yogurt fermentation industry. Multiple lines of evidence suggested that Lb. bulgaricus 2038 was genetically closer to the common ancestor of the subspecies than the other two sequenced collection strains, probably due to a strict industrial maintenance process for strain 2038 that might have halted its genome decay and sustained a gene network suitable for large scale yogurt production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0015964

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole-genome analysis of EPS clusters has been reported for S. thermophilus, Lpb. plantarum and Lact. lactis; comparative genomic analyses for EPS biosynthesis have been performed for Lb. bulgaricus 2038.

    “Whole-genome analysis of EPS clusters have been already reported for some species, such as S. thermophilus [91], Lpb. plantarum [92] and Lact. lactis; additionally, comparative genomic analyses for EPS biosynthesis have been performed for Lb. bulgaricus 2038 [93].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hao, P., Zheng, H., Yu, Y., Ding, G., Gu, W., Chen, S., Yu, Z., Ren, S., Oda, M., Konno, T., Wang, S., Li, X., Ji, Z.-S., & Zhao, G.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (CN)
  • Shanghai Center For Bioinformation Technology (CN)
  • Meiji (Japan) (JP)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Xuan
  • Ji, Zai-Si
  • Zhao, Guoping
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-01-17
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e15964
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087428022
Cited by
100
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (30830002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Lactobacillus bulgaricus, yogurt fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, pan-genome, genome sequencing, industrial strain, lysine biosynthesis, formate production, extracellular polymeric substances, stress tolerance
MeSH terms
Fermentation, Phylogeny, Yogurt, Genome, Bacterial, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Food Industry, Lactobacillus delbrueckii

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review