The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Achieving national reductions in greenhouse gas emissions will require public support for climate and energy policies and changes in population behaviors. Audience segmentation--a process of identifying coherent groups within a population--can be used to improve the effectiveness of public engagement campaigns. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In Fall 2008, we conducted a nationally representative survey of American adults (n = 2,164) to identify audience segments for global warming public engagement campaigns. By subjecting multiple measures of global warming beliefs, behaviors, policy preferences, and issue engagement to latent class analysis, we identified six distinct segments ranging in size from 7 to 33% of the population. These six segments formed a continuum, from a segment of people who were highly worried, involved and supportive of policy responses (18%), to a segment of people who were completely unconcerned and strongly opposed to policy responses (7%). Three of the segments (totaling 70%) were to varying degrees concerned about global warming and supportive of policy responses, two (totaling 18%) were unsupportive, and one was largely disengaged (12%), having paid little attention to the issue. Certain behaviors and policy preferences varied greatly across these audiences, while others did not. Using discriminant analysis, we subsequently developed 36-item and 15-item instruments that can be used to categorize respondents with 91% and 84% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In late 2008, Americans supported a broad range of policies and personal actions to reduce global warming, although there was wide variation among the six identified audiences. To enhance the impact of campaigns, government agencies, non-profit organizations, and businesses seeking to engage the public can selectively target one or more of these audiences rather than address an undifferentiated general population. Our screening instruments are available to assist in that process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“’’ [1] Wicked problems have no easy solutions in that they are beyond the capacity of any one organization to solve, and there is disagreement among organizations about both the causes and the best means by which to solve the problem [2].”
BackgroundThe SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences
Kaplan, D. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412986311 · Cited by 1,454
Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions
Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-299 · Cited by 454
Self-citationThe Role of Causality in Information Acceptance in Narratives: An Example From Science Communication
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210362683 · Cited by 135
Cited by
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · Cited by 965
A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A Letter
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6 · Cited by 632
Self-citationThe role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12140 · Cited by 580
Self-citationReframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions
Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-299 · Cited by 454
Self-citationMetag, J., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515592558 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-03-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e17571
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038359502
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 60.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
- The paper
- Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.