Cited by 78Marine Sponges and Natural ProductsCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology

Crustose Coralline Algae and a Cnidarian Neuropeptide Trigger Larval Settlement in Two Coral Reef Sponges

Open access
Whalan, Steve, Webster, Nicole S., Negri, Andrew P.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

In sessile marine invertebrates, larval settlement is fundamental to population maintenance and persistence. Cues contributing to the settlement choices and metamorphosis of larvae have important implications for the success of individuals and populations, but cues mediating larval settlement for many marine invertebrates are largely unknown. This study assessed larval settlement in two common Great Barrier Reef sponges, Coscinoderma matthewsi and Rhopaloeides odorabile, to cues that enhance settlement and metamorphosis in various species of scleractinian coral larvae. Methanol extracts of the crustose coralline algae (CCA), Porolithon onkodes, corresponding to a range of concentrations, were used to determine the settlement responses of sponge larvae. Cnidarian neuropeptides (GLW-amide neuropeptides) were also tested as a settlement cue. Settlement in both sponge species was approximately two-fold higher in response to live chips of CCA and optimum concentrations of CCA extract compared to 0.2 µm filtered sea water controls. Metamorphosis also increased when larvae were exposed to GLW-amide neuropeptides; R. odorabile mean metamorphosis reached 42.0±5.8% compared to 16.0±2.4% in seawater controls and in C. matthewsi mean metamorphosis reached 68.3±5.4% compared to 36.7±3.3% in seawater controls. These results demonstrate the contributing role chemosensory communication plays in the ability of sponge larvae to identify suitable habitat for successful recruitment. It also raises the possibility that larvae from distinct phyla may share signal transduction pathways involved in metamorphosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0030386

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This environmental-cue-triggered metamorphosis pattern is seen across corals, annelids, molluscs, ascidians and others.

    “This pattern is seen across corals, annelids, molluscs, ascidians and others [73-77].”

    From An option space for early neural evolution (2015) · cites this paper as [77]

  • Neuroendocrine signalling during larval settlement and metamorphosis employs the same or homologous molecules, including nitric oxide and Wamide neuropeptides, suggesting deep evolutionary conservation.

    “The neuroendocrine signalling during larval settlement and metamorphosis employs the same or homologous signalling molecules, including nitric oxide (NO) and Wamide neuropeptides [77,79,80], suggesting deep evolutionary conservation [81].”

    From An option space for early neural evolution (2015) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whalan, S., Webster, N. S., & Negri, A. P.
Affiliations
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU)
Corresponding author
Whalan, Steve
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-25
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e30386
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102921687
Cited by
78
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Keywords
larval settlement, coral reef sponges, crustose coralline algae, metamorphosis, chemosensory cues, settlement cues, sponge larvae, signaling pathways, Great Barrier Reef
MeSH terms
Rhodophyta, Amides, Animals, Cnidaria, Larva, Metamorphosis, Biological, Neuropeptides, Plant Extracts, Porifera, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Coral Reefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review