Cited by 245Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Medication Adherence in Type 2 Diabetes: The ENTRED Study 2007, a French Population-Based Study

Open access
Tiv, Michel, Viel, Jean-François, Mauny, Frédéric, Eschwège, Eveline, Weill, Alain, Fournier, Cécile, Fagot-Campagna, Anne, Penfornis, Alfred·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to prescribed medications is a key dimension of healthcare quality. The aim of this large population-based study was to evaluate self-reported medication adherence and to identify factors linked with poor adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in France. METHODOLOGY: The ENTRED study 2007, a French national survey of people treated for diabetes, was based on a representative sample of patients who claimed reimbursement for oral hypoglycaemic agents and/or insulin at least three times between August 2006 and July 2007, and who were randomly selected from the database of the two main National Health Insurance Systems. Medication adherence was determined using a six-item self-administered questionnaire. A multinomial polychotomous logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with medication adherence in the 3,637 persons with type 2 diabetes. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty nine percent of patients reported good medication adherence, 49% medium adherence and 12% poor adherence. The factors significantly associated with poor adherence in multivariate analysis were socio-demographic factors: age <45 years, non-European geographical origin, financial difficulties and being professionally active; disease and therapy-related factors: HbA(1c)>8% and existing diabetes complications; and health care-related factors: difficulties for taking medication alone, decision making by the patient only, poor acceptability of medical recommendations, lack of family or social support, need for information on treatment, reporting no confidence in the future, need for medical support and follow-up by a specialist physician. CONCLUSIONS: In a country with a high level of access to healthcare, our study demonstrated a substantial low level of medication adherence in type 2 diabetic patients. Better identification of those with poor adherence and individualised suitable recommendations remain essential for better healthcare management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0032412

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor adherence to insulin administration is common in patients with diabetes, with up to half reporting poor adherence and one-third reporting insulin omission.

    “Among factors that could explain the low rate of optimal response to insulin therapy, poor adherence to insulin administration has been reported in up to half of patients with diabetes,7-9 with one-third of patients reporting an average of 3 episodes of insulin omission within the previous month.8,10”

    From Efficacy of a Smart Insulin Pen Cap for the Management of Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results (Medication adherence; page unavailable) report that 39% of patients had good medication adherence, supporting the general point that suboptimal adherence is common. The paper does not give an insulin-administration-specific estimate of up to half. The insulin-omission figure is attached to other citations in the citing sentence, not to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Girerd X Hanon O Anagnostopoulos K Ciupek C Mourad JJ 2001 Evaluation de l'observance du traitement anti-hypertenseur par un questionnaire: mise au point et utilisation dans un service spécialisé. Presse Med 30 1044 1048 11471275

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiv, M., Viel, J.-F., Mauny, F., Eschwège, E., Weill, A., Fournier, C., Fagot-Campagna, A., & Penfornis, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • l'Assurance Maladie (FR)
  • Institut National de Prévention et d’Education pour la Santé (FR)
Corresponding author
Penfornis, Alfred
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-03-05
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e32412
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072979222
Cited by
245
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institut de Veille Sanitaire
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
medication adherence, type 2 diabetes, self-reported adherence, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin, HbA1c, diabetes complications, sociodemographic factors, financial hardship, family and social support, patient decision-making, health care access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Drug Monitoring, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review