Cited by 53Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorCultural Differences and ValuesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Mate Value and Self-Esteem: Evidence from Eight Cultural Groups

Open access
Goodwin, Robin, Marshall, Tara, Fülöp, Marta, Adonu, Joseph, Spiewak, Slawomir, Neto, Felix, Hernandez Plaza, Sonia·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

This paper explores self-perceived mate value (SPMV), and its association with self-esteem, in eight cultures. 1066 participants, from 8 cultural groups in 7 countries, rated themselves on 24 SPMVs and completed a measure of self-esteem. Consistent with evolutionary theory, women were more likely to emphasise their caring and passionate romantic nature. In line with previous cross-cultural research, characteristics indicating passion and romance and social attractiveness were stressed more by respondents from individualistic cultures, and those higher on self-expression (rather than survival) values; characteristics indicative of maturity and confidence were more likely to be mentioned by those from Traditional, rather than Secular, cultures. Contrary to gender role theory, societal equality had only limited interactions with sex and SPMV, with honesty of greater significance for male self-esteem in societies with unequal gender roles. These results point to the importance of cultural and environmental factors in influencing self-perceived mate qualities, and are discussed in relation to broader debates about the impact of gender role equality on sex differences in personality and mating strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0036106

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]Goodwin R 1999 Personal relationships across cultures London Routledge 239
  2. [8]Buss DM 1988 The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. J Pers Soc Psychol 54 616 28 3367282
  3. [11]Wilson M Daly M Pound N 2009 Sex differences and intrasexual variation in competitive confrontation and risk taking: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Pfaff DW Arnold AP Etgen AM Fahrbach SE Rubin RT Hormones, Brain and Behavior, 2nd Edition, vol. 5 San Diego Academic Press 2825 2852
  4. [12]Belsky J Steinberg L Draper P 1991 Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Develop 62 647 670 1935336
  5. [16]Leary MR Baumeister RF 2000 The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Zanna MP Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32) San Diego, CA Academic Press 1 62
  6. [22]Hamida SB Mineka S Bailey JM 1998 Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: An evolutionary perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 75 953 966 9825529
  7. [24]Sedikides C Gaertner L Toguchi Y 2003 Pancultural self-enhancement. J Pers Soc Psychol 84 60 79 12518971
  8. [26]Schwartz SH 2006, November Value dimensions of culture and national difference. Society and workplace diversity workshop, University of Bergen, Norway
  9. [29]Lee AJ Zietsch BP 2011 Experimental evidence that women's mate preferences are directly influenced by cues of pathogen prevalence and resource scarcity. Biol Lett 7 892 895 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0454 21697166 PMC3210674 · DOI
  10. [32]Inglehart R Welzel C 2005 Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence New York Cambridge University Press 344
  11. [35]Costa PT Terracciano A McCrae RR 2001 Gender Differences in Personality Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. J Pers Soc Psychol 81 322 31 11519935
  12. [36]Kling KC Hyde JS Showers CJ Buswell BN 1999 Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 125 470 500 10414226
  13. [41]Schmitt DP 2005 Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav Brain Sci 28 247 311 16201459
  14. [44]Kirkpatrick LA Waugh CE Valencia A Webster GD 2002 The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol 82 756 67 12003475
  15. [45]Karney BR McNulty JK Bradbury TN 2001 Cognition and the development of close relationships. Fletcher GJO Clark MS Interpersonal processes Oxford Blackwell 32 59

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodwin, R., Marshall, T., Fülöp, M., Adonu, J., Spiewak, S., Neto, F., & Hernandez Plaza, S.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodwin, Robin
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-04-25
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e36106
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056631401
Cited by
53
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
self-perceived mate value, self-esteem, mate value, cross-cultural comparison, individualism-collectivism, sex differences in personality, mating strategies, evolutionary psychology, honesty, social attractiveness, romantic passion, self-expression values
MeSH terms
Culture, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Sexual Partners, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review