Cited by 49Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and SynchronizationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Walking but Not Barking Improves Verb Recovery: Implications for Action Observation Treatment in Aphasia Rehabilitation

Open access
Marangolo, Paola, Cipollari, Susanna, Fiori, Valentina, Razzano, Carmela, Caltagirone, Carlo·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that action observation treatment without concomitant verbal cue has a positive impact on the recovery of verb retrieval deficits in aphasic patients. In agreement with an embodied cognition viewpoint, a hypothesis has been advanced that gestures and language form a single communication system and words whose retrieval is facilitated by gestures are semantically represented through sensory-motor features. However, it is still an open question as to what extent this treatment approach works. Results from the recovery of motor deficits have suggested that action observation promotes motor recovery only for actions that are part of the motor repertoire of the observer. The aim of the present experiment was to further investigate the role of action observation treatment in verb recovery. In particular, we contrasted the effects induced by observing human actions (e.g. dancing, kicking, pointing, eating) versus non human actions (e.g. barking, printing). Seven chronic aphasic patients with a selective deficit in verb retrieval underwent an intensive rehabilitation training that included five daily sessions over two consecutive weeks. Each subject was asked to carefully observe 115 video-clips of actions, one at a time and, after observing them, they had to produce the corresponding verb. Two groups of actions were randomly presented: humans versus nonhuman actions. In all patients, significant improvement in verb retrieval was found only by observing video-clips of human actions. Moreover, follow-up testing revealed long-term verb recovery that was still present two months after the two treatments had ended. In support of the multimodal concept representation's proposal, we suggest that just the observation of actions pertaining to the human motor repertoire is an effective rehabilitation approach for verb recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0038610

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Richards K Singletary F Koehler S Crosson B Rothi LJG 2002 Treatment of nonfluent aphasia through the pairing of a non-symbolic movement sequence and naming. J Rehabil Res Dev 39 7 16 17638142
  2. [14]Martin A Wiggs CL Ungerleider LG Haxby JV 2000 Category specificity and the brain: the sensory/motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed), The new cognitive neurosciences, second Edition (1023–1036). Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marangolo, P., Cipollari, S., Fiori, V., Razzano, C., & Caltagirone, C.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Corresponding author
Marangolo, Paola
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-06-13
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e38610
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099835622
Cited by
49
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
aphasia rehabilitation, verb retrieval, action observation, embodied cognition, gesture and language, chronic aphasia, motor repertoire, long-term recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review