The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gegenees: Fragmented Alignment of Multiple Genomes for Determining Phylogenomic Distances and Genetic Signatures Unique for Specified Target Groups
Open accessAbstract
The rapid development of Next Generation Sequencing technologies leads to the accumulation of huge amounts of sequencing data. The scientific community faces an enormous challenge in how to deal with this explosion. Here we present a software tool, 'Gegenees', that uses a fragmented alignment approach to facilitate the comparative analysis of hundreds of microbial genomes. The genomes are fragmented and compared, all against all, by a multithreaded BLAST control engine. Ready-made alignments can be complemented with new genomes without recalculating the existing data points. Gegenees gives a phylogenomic overview of the genomes and the alignment can then be mined for genomic regions with conservation patterns matching a defined target group and absent from a background group. The genomic regions are given biomarker scores forming a uniqueness signature that can be viewed and explored, graphically and in tabular form. A primer/probe alignment tool is also included for specificity verification of currently used or new primers. We exemplify the use of Gegenees on the Bacillus cereus group, on Foot and Mouth Disease Viruses, and on strains from the 2011 Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak. Gegenees contributes towards an increased capacity of fast and efficient data mining as more and more genomes become sequenced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement
Darling, A. E., Mau, B., & Perna, N. T. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 · Cited by 3,848
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Phylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence?
JEFFROY, O., BRINKMANN, H., DELSUC, F., & PHILIPPE, H. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.003 · Cited by 698
Cited by
VIRIDIC—A Novel Tool to Calculate the Intergenomic Similarities of Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses
Moraru, C., Varsani, A., & Kropinski, A. M. (2020) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v12111268 · Cited by 872
How to Name and Classify Your Phage: An Informal Guide
Adriaenssens, E., & Brister, J. R. (2017) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v9040070 · Cited by 477
vConTACT: an iVirus tool to classify double-stranded DNA viruses that infect Archaea and Bacteria
Bolduc, B., Jang, H. B., Doulcier, G., You, Z.-Q., Roux, S., & Sullivan, M. B. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3243 · Cited by 287
New Insights into the Diversity of the Genus Faecalibacterium
Benevides, L., Burman, S., Martin, R., Robert, V., Thomas, M., Miquel, S., Chain, F., Sokol, H., Bermudez-Humaran, L. G., Morrison, M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01790 · Cited by 86
“The phylogenomic analysis was performed using Gegenees software (Agren et al., 2012), which calculated the percentage of similarity among the genomes of all strains.”
MethodInfluentialKaden, R., Ågren, J., Båverud, V., Hallgren, G., Ferrari, S., Börjesson, J., Lindberg, M., Bäckman, S., & Wahab, T. (2014) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.10.015 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ågren, J., Sundström, A., Håfström, T., & Segerman, B.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-06-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e39107
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981292743
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gegenees: Fragmented Alignment of Multiple Genomes for Determining Phylogenomic Distances and Genetic Signatures Unique for Specified Target Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0039107
- The paper
- Ågren, J., Sundström, A., Håfström, T., & Segerman, B. (2012). Gegenees: Fragmented Alignment of Multiple Genomes for Determining Phylogenomic Distances and Genetic Signatures Unique for Specified Target Groups. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.