Cited by 268Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microglial Activation Correlates with Disease Progression and Upper Motor Neuron Clinical Symptoms in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated clinicopathological correlates of upper motor neuron (UMN) damage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and analyzed if the presence of the C9ORF72 repeat expansion was associated with alterations in microglial inflammatory activity. METHODS: Microglial pathology was assessed by IHC with 2 different antibodies (CD68, Iba1), myelin loss by Kluver-Barrera staining and myelin basic protein (MBP) IHC, and axonal loss by neurofilament protein (TA51) IHC, performed on 59 autopsy cases of ALS including 9 cases with C9ORF72 repeat expansion. RESULTS: Microglial pathology as depicted by CD68 and Iba1 was significantly more extensive in the corticospinal tract (CST) of ALS cases with a rapid progression of disease. Cases with C9ORF72 repeat expansion showed more extensive microglial pathology in the medulla and motor cortex which persisted after adjusting for disease duration in a logistic regression model. Higher scores on the clinical UMN scale correlated with increasing microglial pathology in the cervical CST. TDP-43 pathology was more extensive in the motor cortex of cases with rapid progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that microglial pathology in the CST of ALS correlates with disease progression and is linked to severity of UMN deficits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0039216

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Staging of CST degeneration in ALS. The figure illustrates the IHC staging used to grade the extent of microglial activation (CD68, Iba1) and axonal loss (MBP, KB, NF) in the CST of ALS patients. Images are taken from the lateral portion of the cervical CST. KB = Kluver-Barrera, MBP = myelin basic protein, NF = neurofilaments (TA51). Large images were taken with 4× objective, Scale bar is 1.0 mm. Small insert images were taken with 60× objective. Small insert image for CD68 stage “0” shows prominent neuronal nuclei, but no activated microglia.
Figure 1 Staging of CST degeneration in ALS. The figure illustrates the IHC staging used to grade the extent of microglial activation (CD68, Iba1) and axonal loss (MBP, KB, NF) in the CST of ALS patients. Images are taken from the lateral portion of the cervical CST. KB = Kluver-Barrera, MBP = myelin basic protein, NF = neurofilaments (TA51). Large images were taken with 4× objective, Scale bar is 1.0 mm. Small insert images were taken with 60× objective. Small insert image for CD68 stage “0” shows prominent neuronal nuclei, but no activated microglia.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Microglial pathology, TDP-43, and neuro-axonal loss in the neuraxis of ALS. Bar plots show extent of microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (a) and Iba1 (b) as well as TDP-43 pathology (c) and myelin loss as an indirect measure of axonal loss (d) in different regions of the neuraxis of ALS. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, grey = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Med = medulla oblongata, motor = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), white = white matter.
Figure 2 Microglial pathology, TDP-43, and neuro-axonal loss in the neuraxis of ALS. Bar plots show extent of microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (a) and Iba1 (b) as well as TDP-43 pathology (c) and myelin loss as an indirect measure of axonal loss (d) in different regions of the neuraxis of ALS. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, grey = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Med = medulla oblongata, motor = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), white = white matter.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Microglial pathology and progression of disease. Bar plot shows microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (a) and Iba1 (b) in ALS patients with a fast and a slow progression of disease. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, grey = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Mot = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), Med = medulla oblongata, wh = white matter.
Figure 3 Microglial pathology and progression of disease. Bar plot shows microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (a) and Iba1 (b) in ALS patients with a fast and a slow progression of disease. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, grey = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Mot = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), Med = medulla oblongata, wh = white matter.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Microglial pathology in ALS with/without C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Bar plot shows microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (above) and Iba1 (below) in ALS patients with and without presence of a C9ORF72 repeat expansion. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, gr = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Mot = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), Med = medulla oblongata, wh = white.
Figure 4 Microglial pathology in ALS with/without C9ORF72 repeat expansion. Bar plot shows microglial pathology as detected by staining for CD68 (above) and Iba1 (below) in ALS patients with and without presence of a C9ORF72 repeat expansion. For the spinal cord sections, the grey matter examined was the anterior horn and the white matter examined was the anterior and lateral portion of the CST. Whiskers in bar plot indicate 95% confidence interval of mean. CSC = cervical spinal cord, gr = grey matter, LSC = lumbar spinal cord, Mot = motor cortex (gyrus praecentralis), Med = medulla oblongata, wh = white.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Brettschneider, J., Toledo, J. B., Van Deerlin, V. M., Elman, L., McCluskey, L., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Trojanowski, J. Q.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Brettschneider, Johannes
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-06-14
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
e39216
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974485241
Cited by
268
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (AG10124)
  • National Institutes of Health (AG 10 124, AG 17586)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG033101, AG-32953, P30AG010124, P01AG017586, AG17586, AG-10124, K08AG033101, P01AG032953)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, microglial activation, upper motor neuron lesion, corticospinal tract, C9orf72 repeat expansion, disease progression, TDP-43 pathology, demyelination, axonal loss, neuroinflammation, motor cortex, medulla
MeSH terms
Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Axons, Base Sequence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Neurons, Cohort Studies, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Open Reading Frames, Microglia, DNA Primers, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review