The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of MCC and CEN Error Measures in Multi-Class Prediction
Open accessAbstract
We show that the Confusion Entropy, a measure of performance in multiclass problems has a strong (monotone) relation with the multiclass generalization of a classical metric, the Matthews Correlation Coefficient. Analytical results are provided for the limit cases of general no-information (n-face dice rolling) of the binary classification. Computational evidence supports the claim in the general case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures




Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MCC is the only binary classification rate that generates a high score only if the binary predictor was able to correctly predict the majority of positive data instances and the majority of negative data instances [80, 97].”
From The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation (2020) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 50,387
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Richards, J. W. (1915) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.42.1074.161 · Cited by 13,941
Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets
Demšar, J. (2006) · doi:10.5555/1248547.1248548 · Cited by 12,051
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Sørlie, T., Tibshirani, R. J., Parker, J. S., Hastie, T. J., Marron, J. S., Nobel, A. B., Deng, S., Johnsen, H., Pesich, R., Geisler, S. B., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0932692100 · Cited by 5,508
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“This latter function was introduced in (Matthews, 1975) and it is also known as the φ -coe ffi cient, corresponding for a 2 × 2 contingency table to the square root of the average χ 2 statistic χ 2 / n . p MCC has recently attracted the attention of the machine learning community (Baldi et al., 2000)…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]Landgrebe T, Duin R (2005) On Neyman-Pearson optimisation for multiclass classifiers. In: Proceedings 16th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa. PRASA, pp. 165–170.
- [12]Landgrebe T, Duin R (2006) A simplified extension of the Area under the ROC to the multiclass domain. In: Proceedings 17th Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa. PRASA, pp. 241–245.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–404 of 404
FLAM: Evaluating Model Performance with Aggregatable Measures in Federated Learning
Stricker, F., Peregrina, J. A., Bermbach, D., & Zirpins, C. (2026) · International Conference on Federated Learning and Intelligent Computing Systems (FLICS) · doi:10.1109/flics70075.2026.11621886
Simões, J., & Correia, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7266101
Chemometrics in qualitative analysis: identification, discrimination, and authentication
Rodionova, O. Y., & Pomerantsev, A. L. (2026) · Russian Chemical Reviews · doi:10.59761/rcr5242
Probabilistic optimization of ML for heart disease prediction
Khan, A., Shah, S. N., Khan, M. E. A. R., Siddiqui, Y., Asaf, B. B., Nafis, M. T., Hussain, A., Raza, A., & Badar, M. S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44915-4.00007-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurman, G., Riccadonna, S., & Furlanello, C.
- Affiliations
- Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Jurman, Giuseppe
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-08-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e41882
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3414515
- OpenAlex
- W1988301066
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- Matthews correlation coefficient, multi-class classification, generalization, binary classification, monotonicity
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computers, Genotype, Probability, ROC Curve, Software, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Entropy, Computational Biology, Area Under Curve, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review